Argumentative Trends in Opinion Columns in Two High Circulation Colombian Newspapers

Taking into account the importance of the media for society and the role of the academy in the training of reflexive and critical subjects, this article of reflection, derived from a doctoral tesis that is still under construction in the teaching of understanding of texts of argumentative typology,...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2020
Institución:
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/10977
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/linguistica_hispanica/article/view/9742
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/10977
Palabra clave:
argumentation; opinion columns; reading comprehension; high education in Colombia; rhetoric
argumentación; columnas de opinión; comprensión lectora; educación superior en Colombia; retórica
argumentation
articles d›opinion
compréhension de lecture
enseignement supérieur en Colombie
argumentação
colunas de opinião
compreensão de leitura
ensino superior na Colômbia
retórica
Rights
openAccess
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Cuadernos de Lingüística Hispánica
Description
Summary:Taking into account the importance of the media for society and the role of the academy in the training of reflexive and critical subjects, this article of reflection, derived from a doctoral tesis that is still under construction in the teaching of understanding of texts of argumentative typology, intends to identify, from a historical-hermeneutic análisis and in a corpus of more than  543 opinion columns, whose theme revolves around  higher education in Colombia during the post-conflict period (2016-2018), the main argumentative tendencies that stand out there and those used by several of the authors of the two must important newspapers of mass circulation in Colombia (El Tiempo and El Espectador). The results of the investigation show the predominance of certain types of reasonings (pragmatic, cause-effect, authority, example and probable) that are analyzed considering ancient and neo-rhetoric; thanks to them, the authors seek to gain the adhesión of the members of the discursive communities to which they are directed.