The textual architecture of the carnival of Daniel Ospina
This reflection paper, derived from a thesis on the teaching of the understanding of ironic argumentative texts, addresses, in the light of socio discursive interactionism, the possible carnavalized textual architecture that comes from a corpus of 117 opi...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2018
- Institución:
- Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/10954
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/linguistica_hispanica/article/view/8117
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/10954
- Palabra clave:
- verbal irony
textual architecture
carnivalization
opinion columns
ironía verbal
arquitectura textual
carnavalización
columnas de opinión.
ironie verbale
architecture textuelle
carnavalisation
colonne d’opinion
ironia verbal
arquitetura textual
carnavalização
colunas de opinião
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Copyright (c) 2018 Cuadernos de Lingüística Hispánica
Summary: | This reflection paper, derived from a thesis on the teaching of the understanding of ironic argumentative texts, addresses, in the light of socio discursive interactionism, the possible carnavalized textual architecture that comes from a corpus of 117 opinion columns by Daniel Samper Ospina published between 2014 and 2016 in Semana Magazine (Colombia). From a hermeneutic interest and supported by pragmalinguistic perspectives of the study of verbal irony, traits of the “bajtianian carnival” are identified in the three levels of textual infrastructure (thanks to the traditional argumentative dispositio and the variety of genres), textualization (through investments in Levinson's neogritian principles, according to the Grupo de la Ironía, Alicante, Lengua Española, Griale ) and the enunciative responsibility (as a result of the insertion of absurd enunciators that mask the speaker ́s function ). This reinforces the conception of irony as a carnivalizing textual device of the action of saying, its modes, its voices and its structures |
---|