Agronomic response of cocoa mucilago (Theobroma cacao L.) in maize culture (Zea mays L.)

The production of drained mucilage of beans of Theobroma cacao, T. grandiflorumand T. bicolorin wooden box was compared and then its possible use as biofertilizer was evaluated. T. cacaoshowed the highest production of drained mucilage (4.5 ml mucilage kg-1grain h-1) with contents of 11.18 mg P L.-1...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2019
Institución:
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/15247
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_en_desarrollo/article/view/7958
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/15247
Palabra clave:
mucilago drenado
análisis de crecimiento
granos de cacao
abono
drained mucilage, growth analysis, cocoa beans, fertilizer.
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
id REPOUPTC2_a1cbee25ffcbdedcc2a0b6caa94a6b78
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/15247
network_acronym_str REPOUPTC2
network_name_str RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository_id_str
spelling 2019-07-232024-07-08T14:23:55Z2024-07-08T14:23:55Zhttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_en_desarrollo/article/view/795810.19053/01217488.v10.n2.2019.7958https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/15247The production of drained mucilage of beans of Theobroma cacao, T. grandiflorumand T. bicolorin wooden box was compared and then its possible use as biofertilizer was evaluated. T. cacaoshowed the highest production of drained mucilage (4.5 ml mucilage kg-1grain h-1) with contents of 11.18 mg P L.-1, 0.2% K and 0.08% N. Subsequently the growth of two varieties of Zea mays(ICA V-305 and Calilla) using drained mucilage of T. cacaowas characterized. The field experiment had five treatments (fertisun, control (without fertilizer), 5% mucilage, 10% mucilage and 15% mucilage) under a completely random design in divided plots. The agronomic response variables evaluated were: Absolute Growth Rate (AGR) and Relative Growth Rate (RGR). In the evaluation of AGR in the two varieties of Z. maysstudied, it was observed that the Calilla variety showed greater growth in less time when applied 5% mucilage with respect to the variety ICA V-305, for which it was considered the best treatment to use as biofertilizer. Considering the existence of weeds in the study site, which were only removed in the samplings at 13 and 21 days after seedling not clear tendency was observed in the RGR values for the two varieties of Z. maysevaluated.Se comparó la producción de mucilago drenado de granos de Theobroma cacao, T. grandiflorum y T. bicolor en caja de madera y luego se evaluó su posible uso como biofertilizante. T. cacao presentó la mayor producción de mucilago drenado (4.5 ml mucilago kg-1 grano h-1) con contenidos de 11.18 mg P L.-1, 0.2 % K y 0.08 % N. Posteriormente se determinó el crecimiento de dos variedades de Zea mays (ICA V-305 y Calilla) usando mucilago drenado de T. cacao. El experimento en campo tuvo cinco tratamientos (fertisun, control (sin abonado), 5 % mucilago, 10 % mucilago y 15 % mucilago) bajo un diseño completamente al azar en arreglo de parcelas divididas. Las variables de respuesta agronómica evaluadas fueron: TAC y TRC. En la evaluación de TAC en las dos variedades de Zea mays estudiadas se observó que la variedad calilla presentó mayor crecimiento en menor tiempo cuando se aplicó mucilago drenado al 5 % respecto de la variedad ICA V-305, por lo cual se consideró el mejor tratamiento para usar como abono líquido. Considerando la existencia de malezas en el sitio de estudio, las cuales fueron retiradas solo en los dos primeros muestreos (13 y 21 dds) no se observó una tendencia clara en los valores TRC para las dos variedades de Z. mays evaluadas.application/pdfspaspaUniversidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombiahttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_en_desarrollo/article/view/7958/8650Ciencia En Desarrollo; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2019): Vol 10, Núm. 2 (2019): Julio - Diciembre; 43-58Ciencia en Desarrollo; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2019): Vol 10, Núm. 2 (2019): Julio - Diciembre; 43-582462-76580121-7488mucilago drenadoanálisis de crecimientogranos de cacaoabonodrained mucilage, growth analysis, cocoa beans, fertilizer.Agronomic response of cocoa mucilago (Theobroma cacao L.) in maize culture (Zea mays L.)Respuesta agronómica de mucilago de cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) en cultivo de maíz (Zea mays L.)info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Sánchez-Olaya, Diana MariaRodriguez Perez, WilsonCastro Rojas, Diego FranciscoTrujillo Trujillo, Edwin001/15247oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/152472025-07-18 10:56:33.122metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.uptc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UPTCrepositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv Agronomic response of cocoa mucilago (Theobroma cacao L.) in maize culture (Zea mays L.)
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv Respuesta agronómica de mucilago de cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) en cultivo de maíz (Zea mays L.)
title Agronomic response of cocoa mucilago (Theobroma cacao L.) in maize culture (Zea mays L.)
spellingShingle Agronomic response of cocoa mucilago (Theobroma cacao L.) in maize culture (Zea mays L.)
mucilago drenado
análisis de crecimiento
granos de cacao
abono
drained mucilage, growth analysis, cocoa beans, fertilizer.
title_short Agronomic response of cocoa mucilago (Theobroma cacao L.) in maize culture (Zea mays L.)
title_full Agronomic response of cocoa mucilago (Theobroma cacao L.) in maize culture (Zea mays L.)
title_fullStr Agronomic response of cocoa mucilago (Theobroma cacao L.) in maize culture (Zea mays L.)
title_full_unstemmed Agronomic response of cocoa mucilago (Theobroma cacao L.) in maize culture (Zea mays L.)
title_sort Agronomic response of cocoa mucilago (Theobroma cacao L.) in maize culture (Zea mays L.)
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv mucilago drenado
análisis de crecimiento
granos de cacao
abono
topic mucilago drenado
análisis de crecimiento
granos de cacao
abono
drained mucilage, growth analysis, cocoa beans, fertilizer.
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv drained mucilage, growth analysis, cocoa beans, fertilizer.
description The production of drained mucilage of beans of Theobroma cacao, T. grandiflorumand T. bicolorin wooden box was compared and then its possible use as biofertilizer was evaluated. T. cacaoshowed the highest production of drained mucilage (4.5 ml mucilage kg-1grain h-1) with contents of 11.18 mg P L.-1, 0.2% K and 0.08% N. Subsequently the growth of two varieties of Zea mays(ICA V-305 and Calilla) using drained mucilage of T. cacaowas characterized. The field experiment had five treatments (fertisun, control (without fertilizer), 5% mucilage, 10% mucilage and 15% mucilage) under a completely random design in divided plots. The agronomic response variables evaluated were: Absolute Growth Rate (AGR) and Relative Growth Rate (RGR). In the evaluation of AGR in the two varieties of Z. maysstudied, it was observed that the Calilla variety showed greater growth in less time when applied 5% mucilage with respect to the variety ICA V-305, for which it was considered the best treatment to use as biofertilizer. Considering the existence of weeds in the study site, which were only removed in the samplings at 13 and 21 days after seedling not clear tendency was observed in the RGR values for the two varieties of Z. maysevaluated.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-08T14:23:55Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-08T14:23:55Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-07-23
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_en_desarrollo/article/view/7958
10.19053/01217488.v10.n2.2019.7958
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/15247
url https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_en_desarrollo/article/view/7958
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/15247
identifier_str_mv 10.19053/01217488.v10.n2.2019.7958
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_en_desarrollo/article/view/7958/8650
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv Ciencia En Desarrollo; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2019): Vol 10, Núm. 2 (2019): Julio - Diciembre; 43-58
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Ciencia en Desarrollo; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2019): Vol 10, Núm. 2 (2019): Julio - Diciembre; 43-58
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 2462-7658
0121-7488
institution Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co
_version_ 1839633841235427328