Behavioral Economics: An Analysis from Interdisciplinarity and Complexity
The article analyzes several assumptions of behavioral economics, to contribute to its application and theoretical understanding. The research is pure basic, documentary and exploratory. The main theoretical references of behavioral economics are analyzed through the hypothetical-deductive method....
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6799
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2022
- Institución:
- Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/12072
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/cenes/article/view/13983
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/12072
- Palabra clave:
- economía
racionalidad
creencias
toma de decisiones
experimentación
comportamiento económico
economics
rationality
beliefs
decision making
experimentation
economic behavior
- Rights
- License
- Copyright (c) 2022 Armenio Pérez Martínez
Summary: | The article analyzes several assumptions of behavioral economics, to contribute to its application and theoretical understanding. The research is pure basic, documentary and exploratory. The main theoretical references of behavioral economics are analyzed through the hypothetical-deductive method. A logical-epistemic-prospective study of the knowledge built in behavioral economics and possible further advances is carried out. The research points out the need to complement the limited rationality perspective, analyzes the dual system of reasoning (SDR) and focuses on experimentation as a way to generate new knowledge. The conclusions promote the understanding of rationality from an interdisciplinary and complex vision, with components such as cognitive potential, optimization of results, sufficient information, and control. The SDR is considered to be complex, where reflexive and self-control elements make the response speed slower. These considerations generate new opportunities for analysis and reflection on the psychosocial determinants of the behavior of economic agents. |
---|