The new economic history, the theory of regulation and social historical analysis: notes for a debate
The primary purpose of this essay is to demonstrate whether the new economic history (NEH) is a variant of social history, or if it has an origin in the economy as such. The article demonstrates the latter, which leads it to consider the specific paradigm of its genesis, its strengths and weaknesses...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7018
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2012
- Institución:
- Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/11632
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/cenes/article/view/20
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/11632
- Palabra clave:
- History
economics
social
institutions
crisis
paradigms
Historia
economía
social
instituciones
crisis
paradigmas
- Rights
- License
- Copyright (c) 2012 Danilo Torres Reina
| Summary: | The primary purpose of this essay is to demonstrate whether the new economic history (NEH) is a variant of social history, or if it has an origin in the economy as such. The article demonstrates the latter, which leads it to consider the specific paradigm of its genesis, its strengths and weaknesses and the importance to economic historian and social analysis. Stated above, we outline an alternative perspective that make possible to overcome some of the shortcomings of this paradigm, which has become a dominant methodology for economic history. This renewed look at historical economic phenomena, recovers the social essence that characterized the economic history in its origins |
|---|