Design and validation of a model for evaluating the quality of agricultural technical assistance in Colombia

Technical assistance programs for agriculture in Colombia are regulated by laws, agreements, and policies that define the importance of evaluating and monitoring this service. National, regional and municipal entities are responsible for developing performance evaluations; however, several weaknesse...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6901
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Institución:
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/16759
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/6324
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/16759
Palabra clave:
Participative management
agricultural law
quality service
self-assessment
continuous improvement
qualitative content analysis.
SB317.5-319.864
SB320-353.5
S544-545.53
Gestión participativa
legislación agropecuaria
calidad del servicio
autoevaluación
mejoramiento continuo
método de análisis de contenido.
SB317.5-319.864
SB320-353.5
S544-545.53
Rights
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Description
Summary:Technical assistance programs for agriculture in Colombia are regulated by laws, agreements, and policies that define the importance of evaluating and monitoring this service. National, regional and municipal entities are responsible for developing performance evaluations; however, several weaknesses are evident. This paper proposes the Quality Assessment Model of Agricultural Advisory Services (known in Spanish as MECATA), an evaluation tool based on the adaptation of an EFQM model (European Foundation for Quality Management). The MECATA model was developed from the selection of 39 variables related to service quality; this model considered the adjustment of three assessment tools and a validation process of two entities in Boyacá. The results showed a positive service assessment given by users and technical assistants, but lower qualifications were considered in variables such as process innovation, integral service, continued education, participation in other activities and market inclusion. MECATA proposes a quality assessment that integrates several perspectives of technical assistance services based on local community requirements; these results can be used as the basis for proposals for improvement.