Validation and authentication of education and pedagogical research

This research paper develops ideas about the meaning and processes of validation and authentication of scientific research in education and pedagogy. It presents criteria and reflections that contribute to the examination of conceptions and common research practices in the academic, disciplinary and...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6871
Fecha de publicación:
2011
Institución:
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Repositorio:
RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/13308
Acceso en línea:
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/praxis_saber/article/view/1129
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/13308
Palabra clave:
education sciences
research in education
pedagogical research
authentication of the research
validation of the research.
Ciencias de la Educación
Investigación en educación
Investigación pedagógica
Legitimación de la investigación
Validación de la investigación
Sciences de l’Education
Recherche en éducation
Recherche pédagogique
Légitimation de la recherche
Validation de la recherche.
Ciências da Educação
Investigação em educação
Investigação pedagógica
Legitimação da investigação
Validação da investigação.
Rights
License
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf372
Description
Summary:This research paper develops ideas about the meaning and processes of validation and authentication of scientific research in education and pedagogy. It presents criteria and reflections that contribute to the examination of conceptions and common research practices in the academic, disciplinary and professional fields. Core concepts such as science, scientific research, community of competent practitioners, validation and authentication are developed in an explanatory and argued manner. The presentation of the concepts emphasizes the social, public and argumentative nature of science, as a system, and scientific research, as a process. Based on the articulation of these concepts, it is argued, and concluded, that the community of competent peers is the most suitable, by nature, to validate an investigation, and that legitimacy is a gradual process, carried out by society based on limited and historically contingent interests and values. In the light of these approaches, we introduce and challenge some conceptions and existing practices in our academic environments.