Agronomic management of cape gooseberry in Loja, Ecuador: effects of soil-based fertilization, pruning, and training systems

Autores:: Córdova-Zambrano, Juliana Lilibeth
Erazo-Hurtado, Santiago
Granja, Fernando

Tipo de recurso:: Article of journal

Fecha de publicación:: 2026

Institución:: Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia

Repositorio:: RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC

Idioma:: eng

id	REPOUPTC2_52e44c949ed4e83b763df4c93842a6b9
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/23005
network_acronym_str	REPOUPTC2
network_name_str	RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv	Agronomic management of cape gooseberry in Loja, Ecuador: effects of soil-based fertilization, pruning, and training systems
title	Agronomic management of cape gooseberry in Loja, Ecuador: effects of soil-based fertilization, pruning, and training systems
spellingShingle	Agronomic management of cape gooseberry in Loja, Ecuador: effects of soil-based fertilization, pruning, and training systems Canopy architecture Agronomic management Phenology Yield Production Andean fruits Arquitectura del dosel Manejo agronómico Fenología Rendimiento Producción Frutas andinas
title_short	Agronomic management of cape gooseberry in Loja, Ecuador: effects of soil-based fertilization, pruning, and training systems
title_full	Agronomic management of cape gooseberry in Loja, Ecuador: effects of soil-based fertilization, pruning, and training systems
title_fullStr	Agronomic management of cape gooseberry in Loja, Ecuador: effects of soil-based fertilization, pruning, and training systems
title_full_unstemmed	Agronomic management of cape gooseberry in Loja, Ecuador: effects of soil-based fertilization, pruning, and training systems
title_sort	Agronomic management of cape gooseberry in Loja, Ecuador: effects of soil-based fertilization, pruning, and training systems
dc.creator.fl_str_mv	Córdova-Zambrano, Juliana Lilibeth Erazo-Hurtado, Santiago Granja, Fernando
dc.contributor.author.eng.fl_str_mv	Córdova-Zambrano, Juliana Lilibeth Erazo-Hurtado, Santiago Granja, Fernando
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv	Canopy architecture Agronomic management Phenology Yield Production Andean fruits Arquitectura del dosel Manejo agronómico Fenología Rendimiento Producción Frutas andinas
topic	Canopy architecture Agronomic management Phenology Yield Production Andean fruits Arquitectura del dosel Manejo agronómico Fenología Rendimiento Producción Frutas andinas
publishDate	2026
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv	2026-08-29 21:18:22
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv	2026-08-29 21:18:22
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv	2026-08-29
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.local.eng.fl_str_mv	Journal article
dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv	Text
dc.type.coarversion.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
format	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv	2011-2173
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv	10.19053/uptc.24223719.21019
dc.identifier.eissn.none.fl_str_mv	2422-3719
dc.identifier.url.none.fl_str_mv	https://doi.org/10.19053/uptc.24223719.21019
identifier_str_mv	2011-2173 10.19053/uptc.24223719.21019 2422-3719
url	https://doi.org/10.19053/uptc.24223719.21019
dc.language.iso.eng.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.references.eng.fl_str_mv	Andrade-Gordillo, M.N., J.S. Erazo-Hurtado, F.E. Tinoco-Tinoco, and J.F. Granja-Travez. 2026. Fertilization of Physalis peruviana and its influence on beer quality with two yeast strains. Rev. Fac. Nac. Agron. Medellín 79(1), e119732. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v79.119732 Angulo, R. 2005. Crecimiento, desarrollo y producción de la uchuva en condiciones de invernadero y campo abierto. pp. 111-129. In: Fischer, G., D. Miranda, W. Piedrahíta, and J. Romero (eds.). Avances en cultivo, poscosecha y exportación de la uchuva. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota. Caproni, C.M., D. Souza, and R.A. Moreira. 2024. Production and quality of Physalis peruviana fruit applying different doses of simple superphosphate in the southern region of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Colloquium Agrariae 20(1), e244774. Criollo, H., T.C. Lagos, G. Fischer, L. Mora, and L. Zamudio. 2014. Comportamiento de tres genotipos de uchuva (Physalis peruviana L.) bajo diferentes sistemas de poda. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic. 8(1), 34-43. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2014v8i1.2798 D’angelo, J.W.O., M.C. Bastos, and F.L. Cuquel. 2017. Maintenance pruning in physalis commercial production. Bragantia 76(2), 214-219. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.128 Fischer, G., H.E. Balaguera-López, and L.M. Melgarejo. 2024. Crop physiology of Physalis peruviana. pp. 101-120. In: M.F. Ramadan (ed.). Handbook of goldenberry (Physalis peruviana): Cultivation, processing and functionality. Elsevier, London. Fischer, G. and L. Melgarejo. 2020. The ecophysiology of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) - an Andean fruit crop. A review. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic. 14(1), 76-89. Fischer, G., D. Miranda, H.E. Balaguera-López, and S. Gómez-Caro. 2021. La uchuva (Physalis peruviana L.), manejo integrado del cultivo y poscosecha. pp. 381-404. Cultivo, poscosecha, procesado y comercio de berries. Biblioteca Horticultura, Valencia, Spain. Guajardo-Paz, I., V. Robledo-Torres, R. Mendoza-Villarreal, A. Hernández-Pérez, M. Sandoval-Villa, and M. Cabrera-De la Fuente. 2023. Evaluación de la aplicación de rizobacterias y fertilización química en la producción y calidad del fruto de Physalis peruviana. Investig. Cienc. 31(90), 1-14. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33064/iycuaa2023904281 Herrera-Ramírez, C.D., J.R. Hidrobo-Luna, and E.R. Basantes Morales. 2016. Assessment of the effect of crop live coverage association on golden berry crop (Physalis peruviana L.) in Huaca, Carchi province, Ecuador. Siembra 3(1), 91-100. Doi: https://doi.org/10.29166/siembra.v3i1.266 Kumar, R. and V. Tripathi. 2025. Influence on yield and quality attributes of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) with the application of nitrogen, zinc and boron. Indian J. Hortic. 82(4), 440-447. Doi: https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2025.82.4.9 Lamont, B.B., M.R. Williams, and T. He. 2023. Relative growth rate (RGR) and other confounded variables: mathematical problems and biological solutions. Ann. Bot. 131(4), 555-568. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcad031 Lima, J.E., M.C.M. Cruz, D.A. Alves, N.C. Santos, and A.G. Guimarães. 2021. Pruning, training system, and climate conditions for the perennial cultivation of physalis. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 56, e01850. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-3921.pab2021.v56.01850 Martínez, F.E., J. Sarmiento, G. Fischer, and F. Jiménez. 2008. Efecto de la deficiencia de N, P, K, Ca, Mg y B en componentes de producción y calidad de la uchuva (Physalis peruviana L.). Agron. Colomb. 26(3), 389-298. Moreno-Miranda, C., A. Pilamala, R. Moreno-Miranda, J.I. Molina, L. Cerda-Mejía, and D. Rama. 2020. Análisis de las dimensiones sociales, productivas y de gobernanza de la cadena de Physalis peruviana: un estudio de caso de la zona interandina en Ecuador. Cienc. Tecnol. Agropecu. 21(2), 1-19. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol21_num2_art:1304 Paré, M.C., M.P. Fournier, J. Lafond, and A. Deslauriers. 2022. How management practices influence vegetative and reproductive plant traits of wild lowbush blueberry species. Can. J. Plant Sci. 102(5), 1007-1015. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2021-0242 Pedó, T., I.R. Carvalho, V.J. Szareski, C. Troyjack, J.R. Pimentel, R.A.V. Escalera, F.L. Silva, M. Peter, T.Z. Aumonde, L.C. Oliveira, F.A. Villela, L. Nora, and C.R. Mauch. 2019. Physiological growth attributes, productivity, chemical quality of the fruits of Physalis peruviana under foliar mineral supplementation. J. Agric. Sci. 11(1), 561-568. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v11n1p561 Peña-Castillo, R., M. Neira-Ojeda, J. Javier-Alva, D. Arévalo-Valladolid, R. Chanduvi-García, D. Lindo-Seminario, E. Vera, M. Calero-Merino, M. Quiroz, and A. Morales-Pizarro. 2024. Dosis de bioestimulante y distanciamiento de siembra en correlación con los parámetros productivos en aguaymanto (Physalis peruviana L.). Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosyst. 27, 027. Doi: http://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.5058 Quevedo-Garcia, E., O. Sánchez-Garcia, and C.E. Veloza-Sandoval. 2015. Efecto del tutorado y distancias de siembra sobre el rendimiento de Physalis peruviana L. Rev. U.D.C.A Act. Div. Cient. 18(1), 91-99. Doi: https://doi.org/10.31910/rudca.v18.n1.2015.457 Ramadan, M.F. (ed.) 2024. Handbook of goldenberry (Physalis peruviana): cultivation, processing, chemistry, and functionality. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Rubel, F. and M. Kottek. 2010. Observed and projected climate shifts 1901-2100 depicted by world maps of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Meteorol. Z. 19(2), 135-141. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2010/0430 Sabino-López, J., M. Sandoval-Villa, G. Alcántar-González, C. Ortiz-Solorio, M. Vargas-Hernández, and M.T.B. Colinas-León. 2018. Fecha de trasplante, boro, potasio y poda en la producción de frutos de Physalis peruviana L. en hidroponía e invernadero. Agrociencia 52(2), 255-265. Silva, M.S., H.B.F. Souza, M.S. Rodrigues, R.S.A. Nóbrega, and A.L.S. Conceição. 2021. Physalis peruviana L. cultivated in dystrocohesive yellow latosol is responsive to organic fertilization. Rev. Ciênc. Agrár. 64. Strik, B.C., A. Vance, D.R. Bryla, and D.M. Sullivan. 2019. Organic production systems in northern highbush blueberry: II. Impact of planting method, cultivar, fertilizer, and mulch on leaf and soil nutrient concentrations and relationships with yield from planting through maturity. HortScience 54(10). 1777-1794. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14197-19 Weber, A., F.J. Soldateli, A.O. Bitencourt, A.S. Moura, and M.G. Barcelar. 2021. Number of stems and row spacing on growth and yield of cape gooseberry. Braz. J. Agric. Sci. 16(1), 1-11. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v16i1a9058
dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv	15
dc.relation.citationissue.eng.fl_str_mv	2
dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv	1
dc.relation.citationvolume.eng.fl_str_mv	20
dc.relation.ispartofjournal.eng.fl_str_mv	Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas
dc.relation.bitstream.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/download/21019/17454
dc.relation.citationedition.eng.fl_str_mv	Núm. 2 , Año 2026 : In press/En prensa
dc.rights.eng.fl_str_mv	Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas - 2026
dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coar.eng.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas - 2026 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.mimetype.eng.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.eng.fl_str_mv	Sociedad Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas-SCCH and Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia-UPTC
dc.source.eng.fl_str_mv	https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/21019
institution	Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/bitstreams/0c3304f6-e2a3-4b10-b457-8b0db0c0b7b3/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv	266a69dd6989f75b50b3a9964f0d7c79
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv	MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv	Repositorio Institucional UPTC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv	bdigital@metabiblioteca.com
_version_	1881673966045626368
spelling	Córdova-Zambrano, Juliana LilibethErazo-Hurtado, SantiagoGranja, Fernando2026-08-29 21:18:222026-08-29 21:18:222026-08-292011-217310.19053/uptc.24223719.210192422-3719https://doi.org/10.19053/uptc.24223719.21019application/pdfengSociedad Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas-SCCH and Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia-UPTCRevista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas - 2026http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/view/21019Canopy architectureAgronomic managementPhenologyYieldProductionAndean fruitsArquitectura del doselManejo agronómicoFenologíaRendimientoProducciónFrutas andinasAgronomic management of cape gooseberry in Loja, Ecuador: effects of soil-based fertilization, pruning, and training systemsArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTexthttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Andrade-Gordillo, M.N., J.S. Erazo-Hurtado, F.E. Tinoco-Tinoco, and J.F. Granja-Travez. 2026. Fertilization of Physalis peruviana and its influence on beer quality with two yeast strains. Rev. Fac. Nac. Agron. Medellín 79(1), e119732. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v79.119732Angulo, R. 2005. Crecimiento, desarrollo y producción de la uchuva en condiciones de invernadero y campo abierto. pp. 111-129. In: Fischer, G., D. Miranda, W. Piedrahíta, and J. Romero (eds.). Avances en cultivo, poscosecha y exportación de la uchuva. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota.Caproni, C.M., D. Souza, and R.A. Moreira. 2024. Production and quality of Physalis peruviana fruit applying different doses of simple superphosphate in the southern region of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Colloquium Agrariae 20(1), e244774.Criollo, H., T.C. Lagos, G. Fischer, L. Mora, and L. Zamudio. 2014. Comportamiento de tres genotipos de uchuva (Physalis peruviana L.) bajo diferentes sistemas de poda. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic. 8(1), 34-43. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2014v8i1.2798D’angelo, J.W.O., M.C. Bastos, and F.L. Cuquel. 2017. Maintenance pruning in physalis commercial production. Bragantia 76(2), 214-219. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.128Fischer, G., H.E. Balaguera-López, and L.M. Melgarejo. 2024. Crop physiology of Physalis peruviana. pp. 101-120. In: M.F. Ramadan (ed.). Handbook of goldenberry (Physalis peruviana): Cultivation, processing and functionality. Elsevier, London.Fischer, G. and L. Melgarejo. 2020. The ecophysiology of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) - an Andean fruit crop. A review. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic. 14(1), 76-89.Fischer, G., D. Miranda, H.E. Balaguera-López, and S. Gómez-Caro. 2021. La uchuva (Physalis peruviana L.), manejo integrado del cultivo y poscosecha. pp. 381-404. Cultivo, poscosecha, procesado y comercio de berries. Biblioteca Horticultura, Valencia, Spain.Guajardo-Paz, I., V. Robledo-Torres, R. Mendoza-Villarreal, A. Hernández-Pérez, M. Sandoval-Villa, and M. Cabrera-De la Fuente. 2023. Evaluación de la aplicación de rizobacterias y fertilización química en la producción y calidad del fruto de Physalis peruviana. Investig. Cienc. 31(90), 1-14. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33064/iycuaa2023904281Herrera-Ramírez, C.D., J.R. Hidrobo-Luna, and E.R. Basantes Morales. 2016. Assessment of the effect of crop live coverage association on golden berry crop (Physalis peruviana L.) in Huaca, Carchi province, Ecuador. Siembra 3(1), 91-100. Doi: https://doi.org/10.29166/siembra.v3i1.266Kumar, R. and V. Tripathi. 2025. Influence on yield and quality attributes of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) with the application of nitrogen, zinc and boron. Indian J. Hortic. 82(4), 440-447. Doi: https://doi.org/10.58993/ijh/2025.82.4.9Lamont, B.B., M.R. Williams, and T. He. 2023. Relative growth rate (RGR) and other confounded variables: mathematical problems and biological solutions. Ann. Bot. 131(4), 555-568. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcad031Lima, J.E., M.C.M. Cruz, D.A. Alves, N.C. Santos, and A.G. Guimarães. 2021. Pruning, training system, and climate conditions for the perennial cultivation of physalis. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 56, e01850. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-3921.pab2021.v56.01850Martínez, F.E., J. Sarmiento, G. Fischer, and F. Jiménez. 2008. Efecto de la deficiencia de N, P, K, Ca, Mg y B en componentes de producción y calidad de la uchuva (Physalis peruviana L.). Agron. Colomb. 26(3), 389-298.Moreno-Miranda, C., A. Pilamala, R. Moreno-Miranda, J.I. Molina, L. Cerda-Mejía, and D. Rama. 2020. Análisis de las dimensiones sociales, productivas y de gobernanza de la cadena de Physalis peruviana: un estudio de caso de la zona interandina en Ecuador. Cienc. Tecnol. Agropecu. 21(2), 1-19. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol21_num2_art:1304Paré, M.C., M.P. Fournier, J. Lafond, and A. Deslauriers. 2022. How management practices influence vegetative and reproductive plant traits of wild lowbush blueberry species. Can. J. Plant Sci. 102(5), 1007-1015. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2021-0242Pedó, T., I.R. Carvalho, V.J. Szareski, C. Troyjack, J.R. Pimentel, R.A.V. Escalera, F.L. Silva, M. Peter, T.Z. Aumonde, L.C. Oliveira, F.A. Villela, L. Nora, and C.R. Mauch. 2019. Physiological growth attributes, productivity, chemical quality of the fruits of Physalis peruviana under foliar mineral supplementation. J. Agric. Sci. 11(1), 561-568. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v11n1p561Peña-Castillo, R., M. Neira-Ojeda, J. Javier-Alva, D. Arévalo-Valladolid, R. Chanduvi-García, D. Lindo-Seminario, E. Vera, M. Calero-Merino, M. Quiroz, and A. Morales-Pizarro. 2024. Dosis de bioestimulante y distanciamiento de siembra en correlación con los parámetros productivos en aguaymanto (Physalis peruviana L.). Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosyst. 27, 027. Doi: http://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.5058Quevedo-Garcia, E., O. Sánchez-Garcia, and C.E. Veloza-Sandoval. 2015. Efecto del tutorado y distancias de siembra sobre el rendimiento de Physalis peruviana L. Rev. U.D.C.A Act. Div. Cient. 18(1), 91-99. Doi: https://doi.org/10.31910/rudca.v18.n1.2015.457Ramadan, M.F. (ed.) 2024. Handbook of goldenberry (Physalis peruviana): cultivation, processing, chemistry, and functionality. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Rubel, F. and M. Kottek. 2010. Observed and projected climate shifts 1901-2100 depicted by world maps of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Meteorol. Z. 19(2), 135-141. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2010/0430Sabino-López, J., M. Sandoval-Villa, G. Alcántar-González, C. Ortiz-Solorio, M. Vargas-Hernández, and M.T.B. Colinas-León. 2018. Fecha de trasplante, boro, potasio y poda en la producción de frutos de Physalis peruviana L. en hidroponía e invernadero. Agrociencia 52(2), 255-265.Silva, M.S., H.B.F. Souza, M.S. Rodrigues, R.S.A. Nóbrega, and A.L.S. Conceição. 2021. Physalis peruviana L. cultivated in dystrocohesive yellow latosol is responsive to organic fertilization. Rev. Ciênc. Agrár. 64.Strik, B.C., A. Vance, D.R. Bryla, and D.M. Sullivan. 2019. Organic production systems in northern highbush blueberry: II. Impact of planting method, cultivar, fertilizer, and mulch on leaf and soil nutrient concentrations and relationships with yield from planting through maturity. HortScience 54(10). 1777-1794. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14197-19Weber, A., F.J. Soldateli, A.O. Bitencourt, A.S. Moura, and M.G. Barcelar. 2021. Number of stems and row spacing on growth and yield of cape gooseberry. Braz. J. Agric. Sci. 16(1), 1-11. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v16i1a9058152120Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolashttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencias_horticolas/article/download/21019/17454Núm. 2 , Año 2026 : In press/En prensaPublicationOREORE.xmltext/xml2852https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/bitstreams/0c3304f6-e2a3-4b10-b457-8b0db0c0b7b3/download266a69dd6989f75b50b3a9964f0d7c79MD51falseAnonymousREAD001/23005oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/230052026-11-11 05:15:31.45http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.uptc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UPTCbdigital@metabiblioteca.com

Agronomic management of cape gooseberry in Loja, Ecuador: effects of soil-based fertilization, pruning, and training systems

Publicaciones similares