Comparative study of three zootechnical additives on the production and sanitary behavior of pigs in the post-weaning stage
The objective of the study was to compare the effect of three additives (two probiotics and antibiotic) on productive performance and health of pigs in the post-weaning period. For this 120 barrows of the crossing Landrace x Large White with father Belgian White x Petrain were used, they were of 28...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2016
- Institución:
- Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/10579
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_agricultura/article/view/5557
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/10579
- Palabra clave:
- animals with diarrhea
food additives
probiotic
virginiamycin.
aditivos alimentarios
animales con diarreas
probiótico
virginiamicina
- Rights
- License
- Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Ciencia y Agricultura
id |
REPOUPTC2_27dcddcc3b89139f3312f3c22aa9dc8b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/10579 |
network_acronym_str |
REPOUPTC2 |
network_name_str |
RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Comparative study of three zootechnical additives on the production and sanitary behavior of pigs in the post-weaning stage |
dc.title.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Estudio comparativo de tres aditivos zootécnicos en el comportamiento productivo y sanitario de cerdos en el período post-destete |
title |
Comparative study of three zootechnical additives on the production and sanitary behavior of pigs in the post-weaning stage |
spellingShingle |
Comparative study of three zootechnical additives on the production and sanitary behavior of pigs in the post-weaning stage animals with diarrhea food additives probiotic virginiamycin. aditivos alimentarios animales con diarreas probiótico virginiamicina |
title_short |
Comparative study of three zootechnical additives on the production and sanitary behavior of pigs in the post-weaning stage |
title_full |
Comparative study of three zootechnical additives on the production and sanitary behavior of pigs in the post-weaning stage |
title_fullStr |
Comparative study of three zootechnical additives on the production and sanitary behavior of pigs in the post-weaning stage |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative study of three zootechnical additives on the production and sanitary behavior of pigs in the post-weaning stage |
title_sort |
Comparative study of three zootechnical additives on the production and sanitary behavior of pigs in the post-weaning stage |
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv |
animals with diarrhea food additives probiotic virginiamycin. |
topic |
animals with diarrhea food additives probiotic virginiamycin. aditivos alimentarios animales con diarreas probiótico virginiamicina |
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
aditivos alimentarios animales con diarreas probiótico virginiamicina |
description |
The objective of the study was to compare the effect of three additives (two probiotics and antibiotic) on productive performance and health of pigs in the post-weaning period. For this 120 barrows of the crossing Landrace x Large White with father Belgian White x Petrain were used, they were of 28 days of age and 6.87 kg, divided into three experimental groups based on a completely randomized design and each one with four replications The treatments (T) evaluated were; 1 kg of virginiamycin at 2% per ton of feeding (T1), 1 kg of probiotic with Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Bacillus subtilis and digestive enzymes per ton of feeding (T2) and 15 mL of Ecuadorian preparation with lactic acid bacteria, yeasts and enzymes per kg of body weight (BW) of animals (T3). In this last group it was where the highest final bodyweight was obtained (25.85 kg, P <0.0001) and the best total weight gain (18.97 kg, P <0.0001) and daily (451.75 g /d, P <0.0001). Also, for the same group the conversions of dry matter, crude protein and metabolizable energy were found to be more efficient (1.52 kg/kg of BW; 381.57 g/ kg of PV and 22.99 MJ / kg of BW, respectively). The percentage of animals with diarrhea differed (P <0.0001) between the group that received virginiamycin (50.61%) and microbial additives (27.98% and 21.39%), with no differences between these last two. It is concluded that microbial additives improve the productive and sanitary performance of post -weaning pigs with regards to virginiamycin, and this effect was greater with the Ecuadorian microbial preparation. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-07-05T18:11:26Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-07-05T18:11:26Z |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-11-05 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.en-US.fl_str_mv |
investigation |
dc.type.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
investigación |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_agricultura/article/view/5557 10.19053/01228420.v13.n2.2016.5557 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/10579 |
url |
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_agricultura/article/view/5557 https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/10579 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19053/01228420.v13.n2.2016.5557 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_agricultura/article/view/5557/4589 |
dc.rights.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Ciencia y Agricultura |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Ciencia y Agricultura http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia |
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Ciencia y Agricultura; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2016); 95-105 |
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Ciencia y Agricultura; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2016); 95-105 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
2539-0899 |
institution |
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional UPTC |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co |
_version_ |
1839633861928026112 |
spelling |
2016-11-052024-07-05T18:11:26Z2024-07-05T18:11:26Zhttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_agricultura/article/view/555710.19053/01228420.v13.n2.2016.5557https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/10579The objective of the study was to compare the effect of three additives (two probiotics and antibiotic) on productive performance and health of pigs in the post-weaning period. For this 120 barrows of the crossing Landrace x Large White with father Belgian White x Petrain were used, they were of 28 days of age and 6.87 kg, divided into three experimental groups based on a completely randomized design and each one with four replications The treatments (T) evaluated were; 1 kg of virginiamycin at 2% per ton of feeding (T1), 1 kg of probiotic with Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Bacillus subtilis and digestive enzymes per ton of feeding (T2) and 15 mL of Ecuadorian preparation with lactic acid bacteria, yeasts and enzymes per kg of body weight (BW) of animals (T3). In this last group it was where the highest final bodyweight was obtained (25.85 kg, P <0.0001) and the best total weight gain (18.97 kg, P <0.0001) and daily (451.75 g /d, P <0.0001). Also, for the same group the conversions of dry matter, crude protein and metabolizable energy were found to be more efficient (1.52 kg/kg of BW; 381.57 g/ kg of PV and 22.99 MJ / kg of BW, respectively). The percentage of animals with diarrhea differed (P <0.0001) between the group that received virginiamycin (50.61%) and microbial additives (27.98% and 21.39%), with no differences between these last two. It is concluded that microbial additives improve the productive and sanitary performance of post -weaning pigs with regards to virginiamycin, and this effect was greater with the Ecuadorian microbial preparation.El objetivo del trabajo fue comparar el efecto de tres aditivos (dos probióticos y un antibiótico) en el comportamiento productivo y la salud de cerdos en el período post- destete. Para esto se utilizaron 120 cerdos castrados, del cruce Landrace x Large White con padre Blanco Belga x Pietrain, de 28 d de edad y 6,87 kg, distribuidos en tres grupos experimentales según diseño completamente aleatorizado con cuatro repeticiones cada uno. Los tratamientos (T) evaluados fueron: 1 kg de virginiamicina al 2% por tonelada de alimento (T1), 1 kg de probiótico con Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Bacillus subtilis y enzimas digestivas por tonelada de alimento (T2) y 15 mL de preparado ecuatoriano con bacterias lácticas, levaduras y enzimas por kg de peso vivo (PV) de los animales (T3). En este último grupo fue donde se obtuvo el mayor peso vivo final (25,85 kg, P<0.0001) y la mejor ganancia de peso total (18,97 kg, P<0.0001) y diaria (451,75 g/d, P<0.0001). También, para el mismo grupo se encontraron las conversiones de materia seca, proteína bruta y energía metabolizable más eficientes (1,52 kg/kg de PV; 381,57 g/kg de PV y 22,99 MJ/kg de PV, respectivamente). El porcentaje de animales con diarreas difirió (P<0,0001) entre el grupo que recibió la virginiamicina (50,61%) y los aditivos microbianos (27,98% y 21,39%), sin diferencias entre estos últimos. Se concluye que los aditivos microbianos mejoran el comportamiento productivo y sanitario de cerdos en post-destete con respecto a la virginiamicina, y este efecto fue mayor con el preparado microbiano ecuatoriano.application/pdfspaspaUniversidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombiahttps://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/ciencia_agricultura/article/view/5557/4589Copyright (c) 2016 Revista Ciencia y Agriculturahttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Ciencia y Agricultura; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2016); 95-105Ciencia y Agricultura; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2016); 95-1052539-0899animals with diarrheafood additivesprobioticvirginiamycin.aditivos alimentariosanimales con diarreasprobióticovirginiamicinaComparative study of three zootechnical additives on the production and sanitary behavior of pigs in the post-weaning stageEstudio comparativo de tres aditivos zootécnicos en el comportamiento productivo y sanitario de cerdos en el período post-desteteinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinvestigationinvestigaciónhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Flores-Mancheno, Luis GerardoGarcía-Hernández, YaneisyUsca-Méndez, Julio EnriqueCaicedo-Quinche, William Orlando001/10579oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/105792025-07-18 11:01:23.468metadata.onlyhttps://repositorio.uptc.edu.coRepositorio Institucional UPTCrepositorio.uptc@uptc.edu.co |