Levinas’ ethical perspective: its meaning for education
This paper seeks to outline the link between the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinasand education—παιδεία. By taking a distance from attempts to apply the axiologicaland deontological aspects of Levinas’ ethics in education, it is argued that, beyondinstrumentalizing the fundamental categories of the Lit...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6514
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2021
- Institución:
- Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
- Repositorio:
- RiUPTC: Repositorio Institucional UPTC
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repositorio.uptc.edu.co:001/13605
- Acceso en línea:
- https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/praxis_saber/article/view/11218
https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/13605
- Palabra clave:
- ethics
education
responsibility
face
Other
ética
educación
responsabilidad
rostro
Otro
ética
educação
responsabilidade
rostro
Outro
- Rights
- License
- Derechos de autor 2021 Alfredo Rocha
Summary: | This paper seeks to outline the link between the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinasand education—παιδεία. By taking a distance from attempts to apply the axiologicaland deontological aspects of Levinas’ ethics in education, it is argued that, beyondinstrumentalizing the fundamental categories of the Lithuanian thinker, it is a matter ofunderstanding the meaning of his philosophy and how this can enrich pedagogical practice.The work is carried out in six steps: (1) characterization of Levianasian philosophy as adecentralization of subjectivity and ethical pre-eminence; (2) description of two areasof human experience—enjoyment and Desire—which define (3) two different types ofeducation: for nourishment and for responsibility towards the Other; 4) characterization oftoday’s world as a world of work, of calculation, of skill and of the relation between meansand ends, in which (5) the areas of emergence of a third party—politics, economics, justice,education—are intended to degrade ethics to a second level; and (6) the need to place theface of the Other at the center of the educational act. |
---|