¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae)

Se investigó la relación entre la preferencia de selección de sitios de anidamiento, la posición jerárquica y el éxito reproductivo del Periquito de anteojos (Forpus conspicillatus) en la Universidad del Valle y en la Reserva Natural Pozo Verde, en el Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Los sitios de anidami...

Full description

Autores:

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2020

Institución:: Universidad de Caldas

Repositorio:: Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas

Idioma:: spa

id	REPOUCALDA_d279baaae647d3dbe867be93af2a707c
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/22977
network_acronym_str	REPOUCALDA
network_name_str	Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv	¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae) Does being dominant bring advantages? Hierarchical position, nesting sites and reproductive success of Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae)
title	¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae)
spellingShingle	¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae) dominancia reproducción cajas nido periquito Forpus conspicillatus Colombia dominance reproduction nest boxes parakeet Forpus conspicillatus Colombia
title_short	¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae)
title_full	¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae)
title_fullStr	¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae)
title_full_unstemmed	¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae)
title_sort	¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae)
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv	dominancia reproducción cajas nido periquito Forpus conspicillatus Colombia dominance reproduction nest boxes parakeet Forpus conspicillatus Colombia
topic	dominancia reproducción cajas nido periquito Forpus conspicillatus Colombia dominance reproduction nest boxes parakeet Forpus conspicillatus Colombia
description	Se investigó la relación entre la preferencia de selección de sitios de anidamiento, la posición jerárquica y el éxito reproductivo del Periquito de anteojos (Forpus conspicillatus) en la Universidad del Valle y en la Reserva Natural Pozo Verde, en el Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Los sitios de anidamiento se instalaron según las variables: altura sobre el suelo (1 m y 4 m) y distancia al árbol más próximo (0 m, 15 m y 50 m). Las parejas de adultos prefirieron las cajas nido ubicadas a 4 m de altura sobre el suelo. La posición jerárquica de las parejas no se correlacionó significativamente con la prioridad de elección de las cajas nido, pero sí con la escogencia de cajas en los sitios preferidos. Las parejas dominantes produjeron un mayor número de huevos que las subordinadas, pero no hubo correlación entre posición jerárquica y número de polluelos que alcanzaron el éxodo. Tampoco se encontró correlación entre productividad anual, medida como el número de polluelos que llegaron al éxodo y la ubicación de las cajas nido. La ausencia de correlación pudo deberse a que la depredación, la principal causa de mortalidad de polluelos, tuvo igual incidencia en todas las situaciones. El infanticidio por Troglodytes aëdon fue responsable del 30.30% de los fracasos de los nidos de F. conspicillatus, pero los daños por T. aëdon no fueron más frecuentes en los sitios preferidos por F. conspicillatus.&nbsp;
publishDate	2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv	2020-01-01 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z 2025-10-08T21:03:02Z 2025-10-08T21:03:02Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Text info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv	0123-3068 https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/22977 10.17151/bccm.2021.25.1.5 2462-8190 https://doi.org/10.17151/bccm.2021.25.1.5
identifier_str_mv	0123-3068 10.17151/bccm.2021.25.1.5 2462-8190
url	https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/22977 https://doi.org/10.17151/bccm.2021.25.1.5
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv	86 1 71 25 Boletín Científico Centro de Museos Museo de Historia Natural Agresti, A. (2015). Foundations of Linear and Generalized Linear Models. New York: Willey. Albano, D. J. (1992). Nesting mortality of Carolina Chickadees breeding in natural cavities. Condor 94, 371-382. https://doi.org/10.2307/1369210 Alcock, J. (1989). Animal Behaviour. (4 ed.). Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc. Alonso, J. C., Bautista, L. M. y Alonso, J. A. (1997). Dominance and the dynamics of phenotype limited distribution in common cranes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 40, 401-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050356 Beissinger, S. R. y Waltman, J. R. (1991). Extraordinary clutch size and hatching asynchrony of a Neotropical Parrot. Auk, 108, 863-871. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/108.4.863 Belles-Isles, J. C. y Picman, J. (1986a). Nesting losses and nest site preferences in House Wrens. Condor, 88, 483-486. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368275 Belles-Isles, J. C. y Picman, J. (1986b). House Wren nest-destroying behavior. Condor, 88, 190-193. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368914 Best, L. B. y Stauffer, D. F. (1980). Factors affecting success in riparian bird communities. Condor, 82, 149-158. https://doi.org/10.2307/1367468 Brawn, J. D. (1988). Selectivity and ecological consequences of cavity nesters using natural vs. artificial nest sites. Auk, 105, 789-791. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4087398 Brawn, J. D. y Balda, R. P. (1988). Population biology of cavity nesters in Northern Arizona: do nest sites limit breeding densities? Condor, 90, 61-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368434 Brightsmith, D. J. (2005). Parrot nesting in southwastern Peru: seasonal patterns and keystone trees. Wilson Bulletin, 117, 296-305. https://doi.org/10.1676/03-087A.1 Davies, N. B., Krebs, J. R. y West, S. A. (2012). An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology. (4 ed). Oxford: Willey Blackwell. Dobkin, D. S., Rich, A. C., Pretare, J. A. y Pyle, W. H. (1995). Nest site relationships among birds of riparian and snowpocket aspen woodlands in the northwestern Great Basin. Condor, 97, 694–707. https://doi.org/10.2307/1369178 Espinal, L. S. (1967). Apuntes sobre Ecología Colombiana. Cali: Universidad del Valle. Finch, D. M. (1989). Relationships of surrounding riparian habitat to nest-box use and reproductive outcome in House wrens. Condor, 91, 848-859. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368069 Freed, L. A. (1986). Usurpatory and opportunistic bigamy in tropical House Wrens. Animal Behaviour, 34, 1894-1896. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80277-9 Garnetzke-Stollmann, K. y Franck, D. (1988). Long-lasting sibling relationships as a mean to acquire reproductive ability in the Spectacled Parrotlet (Forpus conspicillatus). en R. van den Elzen, K-L. Schuchmann y K. Schmidt-Koenig (eds). Current topics in avian biology (pp. 293-298). Stuugart: Deutsche ornithologen-Gesellschaft. Garnetzke-Stollmann, K. y Franck, D. (1991). Socialisation tactics of the spectacled parrotlet (Forpus conspicillatus). Behaviour, 119, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853991X00346 Gill, F. B. (2007). Ornithology. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co. Gómez, N. (1991). Historia Natural de Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae) en el Valle del Cauca (Tesis de pregrado). Universidad del Valle, Cali. Colombia. Hahn, S. y Bauer, S. (2008). Dominance in feeding territories relates to foraging success and offpring grown skuas Catharacta antárctica lonnbergi. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 1149-1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0543-7 Hardy, J. W. (1965). Flock social behavior of the Orange-fronted Parakeet. Condor, 67, 140-156. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1365258 Joy, J. B. (2000). Characteristics of nest cavities and nest trees of the Red-breasted Sapsucker in coastal montane forests. Journal of Field Ornithology, 71, 525–530. https://doi.org/10.1648/0273-8570-71.3.525 Kattán, G. H. y Gómez, N. (1992). Body temperature of Spectacled Parrotlet nestlings in relation to body mass and brood size. Condor, 94, 280-282. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1368818 Krause, J. y Ruxton, G. D. (2002). Living in groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lanning, D. V. y Shiflett, J. T. (1983). Nesting ecology of Thick-billed Parrots. Condor, 85, 66-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/1367891 Levinson, S. T. (1980). The social behavior of the White-fronted Amazon (Amazona albifrons). Conservation of New World Parrots. En R. F. Pasquier (ed.). Proceedings of the JCBP Parrot Working Group Meeting (pp. 403-417). Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. Li, P. y Martin, T. E. (1991). Nest-site selection and nesting success of cavity-nesting birds in high elevation forest drainages. Auk, 108, 405-418. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/108.2.405 Lindsey, G. D. (1992). Nest guarding from observation blinds: strategy for improving Puerto Rican Parrot nest success. Journal Field Ornithology, 63, 466-472. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4513745 Marsden, S. J. y Jones, M. J. (1997). The nesting requirements of the parrots and hornbill of suma, Indonesia. Biological Conservation, 82, 279-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00038-4 Martin, T. E. y Roper, J. L. (1988). Nest predation and nest-site selection of a western population of the Hermit Thrush. Condor, 90, 51-57. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368432 Martin, T. E. y Roper, J. L. (1992). Interaction of nest predation and food limitation in reproductive strategies. Current Ornithology, 9, 163-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9921-7_5 Martin, T. E., Roper, J. L. y Li, P. (1992). Life history traits of open vs. cavity-nesting birds. Ecology, 73, 579-592. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940764 Moller, A. P. (1989). Parasites, predators and nest boxes: facts and artefacts in nest box studies of birds? Oikos, 56, 421-423. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3565628 Nilsson, S. G. (1984). The evolution of nest site selection among hole-nesting birds: the importance of nest predation and competition. Ornis Scandinavica, 15, 165–175. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3675958 Nilsson, S. G. (1986). Evolution of hole-nesting in birds: on balancing selection pressures. Auk, 103, 432-435. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4087101 Peterson, B. y Gauthier, G. (1985). Nest site use by cavity-nesting birds of the Caribou Parkland, British Columbia. Wilson Bulletin, 97, 319-331. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4162105 Poisbleau, M., Guillenain, M., Demongin, L. y Carslake, D. (2009). Within-brood social status and consequences for Winter hierarchies amongst mallard Anas platyrhynchos ducklings. Journal of Ornithology, 150, 195-204. DOI 10.1007/s10336-008-0334-6 Power, D. M. (1966). Agonistic behavior and vocalizations of Orange-chinned Parakeets in captivity. Condor, 68, 562-581. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1366264 Pribil, S. y Picman, J. (1991). Why House Wrens destroy clutches of other birds: a support for the nest site competition hypothesis. Condor, 93, 184-185. https://sora.unm.edu/sites/default/files/journals/condor/.../p0184-p0185.pdf Pulliam, H. R. y Caraco, T. (1984). Living in groups: Is there an optimal group size? En J. R. Krebs y N. B. Davies (eds.). Behavioral ecology. (2 ed.) (pp. 122-147). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. Rendell, W. B. y Robertson, R. J. (1989). Nest-site characteristics, reproductive success and cavity availability for Tree Swallows breeding in natural cavities. Condor, 91, 875-885. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1368072 Renton, K. (2004). Agonistic interactions of nesting and nonbreeding macaws. Condor, 106, 354-362. https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/106.2.354 Rodríguez-Castillo, A. M. y Eberhard, J. R. (2006). Reproductive behavior of the productive behavior of the Yellow-crowned Parrot (Amazona ochrocephala) in western Panama. Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 118, 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1676/05-003.1 Rogers, L. J. y McCulloch, H. (1981). Pair-bonding in the Galah Cacatua roseicapilla. Bird Behaviour, 3, 80-92. https://doi.org/10.3727/015613881791560694 Sánchez–Martínez, T. C. y Renton, K. (2009). Availibility and selection of arboreal termitaria as nest-sites by Orange-fronted Parakeets Aratinga canicularis in conserved and modified landscapes in Mexico. Ibis, 151 (2), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2009.00911.x Skeate, S. T. (1984). Courtship and reproductive behaviour of captive White-fronted Amazon Parrots Amazona albifrons. Bird Behaviour, 5, 103-109. Snyder, N. F. R., Wiley, J. W. y Kepler, C. B. (1987). The Parrots of Luquillo: Natural History and Conservation of the Puerto Rican Parrot. Los Angeles: Western Foundation of Vertebrate Zoology. Stauffer, D. E. y Best, L. B. (1982). Nest site selection by cavity-nesting of riparian habitats in Iowa. Wilson Bulletin, 94, 329-337. http://www.jstor.com/stable/4161643 Strahl, S. D., Desenne, P. A., Jimenez, J. L. y Goldstein, I. R. (1991). Behavior and biology of the Hawk-Headed Parrot, Deroptyus accipitrinus, in Southern Venezuela. Condor, 93, 177-180. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1368622 Waltman, J. R. y Beissinger, S. T. (1992). Breeding behavior of the Green-Rumped Parrotlet. Wilson Bulletin, 104, 65-84. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4163117 Wanker, R. (1990). Beiträge zur Ökologie und Sperlingspapageis (Forpus conspicillatus) Diplomarbeit (Tesis de grado). Universität Hamburg. Wanker, R. (1999). Socialization in Spectacled Parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus): how juveniles compensate for the lack of siblings. Acta Ethological, 2, 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012228 Wanker, R. y Fischer, J. (2001). Intra-and interindividual variation in the contact calls of Spectacled Parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus). Behaviour, 138, 709-726. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853901752233361 Wanker, R., Apcin, J., Jennerjahn, B. y Waibel, B. (1998). Discrimination of different socialcompanions in Spectacled Parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus): evidence for individual vocal recognition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 43, 197-202. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4601505 Wanker, R., Cruz Bernate, L. y Franck, D. (1996). Socialization of Spectacled Parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus): The role of parents, creches and sibling groups in nature. Journal für Ornithologie, 137, 447-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01661101 Núm. 1 , Año 2021 : Enero - Junio https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/boletincientifico/article/download/4335/3985
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Boletín Científico
publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Boletín Científico
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/boletincientifico/article/view/4335
institution	Universidad de Caldas
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_	1855532567003922432
spelling	¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae)Does being dominant bring advantages? Hierarchical position, nesting sites and reproductive success of Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae)dominanciareproduccióncajas nidoperiquitoForpus conspicillatusColombiadominancereproductionnest boxesparakeetForpus conspicillatusColombiaSe investigó la relación entre la preferencia de selección de sitios de anidamiento, la posición jerárquica y el éxito reproductivo del Periquito de anteojos (Forpus conspicillatus) en la Universidad del Valle y en la Reserva Natural Pozo Verde, en el Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Los sitios de anidamiento se instalaron según las variables: altura sobre el suelo (1 m y 4 m) y distancia al árbol más próximo (0 m, 15 m y 50 m). Las parejas de adultos prefirieron las cajas nido ubicadas a 4 m de altura sobre el suelo. La posición jerárquica de las parejas no se correlacionó significativamente con la prioridad de elección de las cajas nido, pero sí con la escogencia de cajas en los sitios preferidos. Las parejas dominantes produjeron un mayor número de huevos que las subordinadas, pero no hubo correlación entre posición jerárquica y número de polluelos que alcanzaron el éxodo. Tampoco se encontró correlación entre productividad anual, medida como el número de polluelos que llegaron al éxodo y la ubicación de las cajas nido. La ausencia de correlación pudo deberse a que la depredación, la principal causa de mortalidad de polluelos, tuvo igual incidencia en todas las situaciones. El infanticidio por Troglodytes aëdon fue responsable del 30.30% de los fracasos de los nidos de F. conspicillatus, pero los daños por T. aëdon no fueron más frecuentes en los sitios preferidos por F. conspicillatus.&nbsp;The relationship between the preference of selection of nesting sites, the hierarchical position and the reproductive success of Spectacled parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus) were researched in Universidad del Valle and Pozo Verde Natural Reserve in Valle del Cauca, Colombia. The nesting sites were installed according to the variables height above the ground (1m and 4m) and distance to nearest tree (0m, 15m and50 m). The adult pairs preferred the nest boxes located 4 m above the ground. The hierarchical position of the pairs was not significantly correlated with the priority of choosing the nest boxes but with the selection of boxes in the preferred sites. The dominant pairs produced a greater number of eggs than the subordinate ones, but there was no correlation between hierarchical position and number of chicks that reached the exodus. Nor there was correlation between annual productivity, measured as the number of chicks that reached the exodus and the location of the nest boxes. The absence of correlation could be due to the fact that predation, the main cause of mortality of chicks, had the same incidence in all situations. Infanticide by Troglodytes aedon was responsible for 30.30% of the nest failures of F. conspicillatus but damage by T. aedon was not more frequent at sites preferred by F. conspicillatus.&nbsp;Boletín Científico2021-01-01T00:00:00Z2025-10-08T21:03:02Z2021-01-01T00:00:00Z2025-10-08T21:03:02Z2020-01-01Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1application/pdf0123-3068https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/2297710.17151/bccm.2021.25.1.52462-8190https://doi.org/10.17151/bccm.2021.25.1.5https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/boletincientifico/article/view/4335spa8617125Boletín Científico Centro de Museos Museo de Historia NaturalAgresti, A. (2015). Foundations of Linear and Generalized Linear Models. New York: Willey.Albano, D. J. (1992). Nesting mortality of Carolina Chickadees breeding in natural cavities. Condor 94, 371-382. https://doi.org/10.2307/1369210Alcock, J. (1989). Animal Behaviour. (4 ed.). Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc.Alonso, J. C., Bautista, L. M. y Alonso, J. A. (1997). Dominance and the dynamics of phenotype limited distribution in common cranes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 40, 401-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050356Beissinger, S. R. y Waltman, J. R. (1991). Extraordinary clutch size and hatching asynchrony of a Neotropical Parrot. Auk, 108, 863-871. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/108.4.863Belles-Isles, J. C. y Picman, J. (1986a). Nesting losses and nest site preferences in House Wrens. Condor, 88, 483-486. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368275Belles-Isles, J. C. y Picman, J. (1986b). House Wren nest-destroying behavior. Condor, 88, 190-193. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368914Best, L. B. y Stauffer, D. F. (1980). Factors affecting success in riparian bird communities. Condor, 82, 149-158. https://doi.org/10.2307/1367468Brawn, J. D. (1988). Selectivity and ecological consequences of cavity nesters using natural vs. artificial nest sites. Auk, 105, 789-791. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4087398Brawn, J. D. y Balda, R. P. (1988). Population biology of cavity nesters in Northern Arizona: do nest sites limit breeding densities? Condor, 90, 61-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368434Brightsmith, D. J. (2005). Parrot nesting in southwastern Peru: seasonal patterns and keystone trees. Wilson Bulletin, 117, 296-305. https://doi.org/10.1676/03-087A.1Davies, N. B., Krebs, J. R. y West, S. A. (2012). An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology. (4 ed). Oxford: Willey Blackwell.Dobkin, D. S., Rich, A. C., Pretare, J. A. y Pyle, W. H. (1995). Nest site relationships among birds of riparian and snowpocket aspen woodlands in the northwestern Great Basin. Condor, 97, 694–707. https://doi.org/10.2307/1369178Espinal, L. S. (1967). Apuntes sobre Ecología Colombiana. Cali: Universidad del Valle.Finch, D. M. (1989). Relationships of surrounding riparian habitat to nest-box use and reproductive outcome in House wrens. Condor, 91, 848-859. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368069Freed, L. A. (1986). Usurpatory and opportunistic bigamy in tropical House Wrens. Animal Behaviour, 34, 1894-1896. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80277-9Garnetzke-Stollmann, K. y Franck, D. (1988). Long-lasting sibling relationships as a mean to acquire reproductive ability in the Spectacled Parrotlet (Forpus conspicillatus). en R. van den Elzen, K-L. Schuchmann y K. Schmidt-Koenig (eds). Current topics in avian biology (pp. 293-298). Stuugart: Deutsche ornithologen-Gesellschaft.Garnetzke-Stollmann, K. y Franck, D. (1991). Socialisation tactics of the spectacled parrotlet (Forpus conspicillatus). Behaviour, 119, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853991X00346Gill, F. B. (2007). Ornithology. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co.Gómez, N. (1991). Historia Natural de Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae) en el Valle del Cauca (Tesis de pregrado). Universidad del Valle, Cali. Colombia.Hahn, S. y Bauer, S. (2008). Dominance in feeding territories relates to foraging success and offpring grown skuas Catharacta antárctica lonnbergi. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 1149-1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0543-7Hardy, J. W. (1965). Flock social behavior of the Orange-fronted Parakeet. Condor, 67, 140-156. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1365258Joy, J. B. (2000). Characteristics of nest cavities and nest trees of the Red-breasted Sapsucker in coastal montane forests. Journal of Field Ornithology, 71, 525–530. https://doi.org/10.1648/0273-8570-71.3.525Kattán, G. H. y Gómez, N. (1992). Body temperature of Spectacled Parrotlet nestlings in relation to body mass and brood size. Condor, 94, 280-282. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1368818Krause, J. y Ruxton, G. D. (2002). Living in groups. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Lanning, D. V. y Shiflett, J. T. (1983). Nesting ecology of Thick-billed Parrots. Condor, 85, 66-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/1367891Levinson, S. T. (1980). The social behavior of the White-fronted Amazon (Amazona albifrons). Conservation of New World Parrots. En R. F. Pasquier (ed.). Proceedings of the JCBP Parrot Working Group Meeting (pp. 403-417). Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.Li, P. y Martin, T. E. (1991). Nest-site selection and nesting success of cavity-nesting birds in high elevation forest drainages. Auk, 108, 405-418. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/108.2.405Lindsey, G. D. (1992). Nest guarding from observation blinds: strategy for improving Puerto Rican Parrot nest success. Journal Field Ornithology, 63, 466-472. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4513745Marsden, S. J. y Jones, M. J. (1997). The nesting requirements of the parrots and hornbill of suma, Indonesia. Biological Conservation, 82, 279-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00038-4Martin, T. E. y Roper, J. L. (1988). Nest predation and nest-site selection of a western population of the Hermit Thrush. Condor, 90, 51-57. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368432Martin, T. E. y Roper, J. L. (1992). Interaction of nest predation and food limitation in reproductive strategies. Current Ornithology, 9, 163-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9921-7_5Martin, T. E., Roper, J. L. y Li, P. (1992). Life history traits of open vs. cavity-nesting birds. Ecology, 73, 579-592. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940764Moller, A. P. (1989). Parasites, predators and nest boxes: facts and artefacts in nest box studies of birds? Oikos, 56, 421-423. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3565628Nilsson, S. G. (1984). The evolution of nest site selection among hole-nesting birds: the importance of nest predation and competition. Ornis Scandinavica, 15, 165–175. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3675958Nilsson, S. G. (1986). Evolution of hole-nesting in birds: on balancing selection pressures. Auk, 103, 432-435. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4087101Peterson, B. y Gauthier, G. (1985). Nest site use by cavity-nesting birds of the Caribou Parkland, British Columbia. Wilson Bulletin, 97, 319-331. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4162105Poisbleau, M., Guillenain, M., Demongin, L. y Carslake, D. (2009). Within-brood social status and consequences for Winter hierarchies amongst mallard Anas platyrhynchos ducklings. Journal of Ornithology, 150, 195-204. DOI 10.1007/s10336-008-0334-6Power, D. M. (1966). Agonistic behavior and vocalizations of Orange-chinned Parakeets in captivity. Condor, 68, 562-581. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1366264Pribil, S. y Picman, J. (1991). Why House Wrens destroy clutches of other birds: a support for the nest site competition hypothesis. Condor, 93, 184-185. https://sora.unm.edu/sites/default/files/journals/condor/.../p0184-p0185.pdfPulliam, H. R. y Caraco, T. (1984). Living in groups: Is there an optimal group size? En J. R. Krebs y N. B. Davies (eds.). Behavioral ecology. (2 ed.) (pp. 122-147). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Rendell, W. B. y Robertson, R. J. (1989). Nest-site characteristics, reproductive success and cavity availability for Tree Swallows breeding in natural cavities. Condor, 91, 875-885. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1368072Renton, K. (2004). Agonistic interactions of nesting and nonbreeding macaws. Condor, 106, 354-362. https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/106.2.354Rodríguez-Castillo, A. M. y Eberhard, J. R. (2006). Reproductive behavior of the productive behavior of the Yellow-crowned Parrot (Amazona ochrocephala) in western Panama. Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 118, 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1676/05-003.1Rogers, L. J. y McCulloch, H. (1981). Pair-bonding in the Galah Cacatua roseicapilla. Bird Behaviour, 3, 80-92. https://doi.org/10.3727/015613881791560694Sánchez–Martínez, T. C. y Renton, K. (2009). Availibility and selection of arboreal termitaria as nest-sites by Orange-fronted Parakeets Aratinga canicularis in conserved and modified landscapes in Mexico. Ibis, 151 (2), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2009.00911.xSkeate, S. T. (1984). Courtship and reproductive behaviour of captive White-fronted Amazon Parrots Amazona albifrons. Bird Behaviour, 5, 103-109.Snyder, N. F. R., Wiley, J. W. y Kepler, C. B. (1987). The Parrots of Luquillo: Natural History and Conservation of the Puerto Rican Parrot. Los Angeles: Western Foundation of Vertebrate Zoology.Stauffer, D. E. y Best, L. B. (1982). Nest site selection by cavity-nesting of riparian habitats in Iowa. Wilson Bulletin, 94, 329-337. http://www.jstor.com/stable/4161643Strahl, S. D., Desenne, P. A., Jimenez, J. L. y Goldstein, I. R. (1991). Behavior and biology of the Hawk-Headed Parrot, Deroptyus accipitrinus, in Southern Venezuela. Condor, 93, 177-180. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1368622Waltman, J. R. y Beissinger, S. T. (1992). Breeding behavior of the Green-Rumped Parrotlet. Wilson Bulletin, 104, 65-84. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4163117Wanker, R. (1990). Beiträge zur Ökologie und Sperlingspapageis (Forpus conspicillatus) Diplomarbeit (Tesis de grado). Universität Hamburg.Wanker, R. (1999). Socialization in Spectacled Parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus): how juveniles compensate for the lack of siblings. Acta Ethological, 2, 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012228Wanker, R. y Fischer, J. (2001). Intra-and interindividual variation in the contact calls of Spectacled Parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus). Behaviour, 138, 709-726. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853901752233361Wanker, R., Apcin, J., Jennerjahn, B. y Waibel, B. (1998). Discrimination of different socialcompanions in Spectacled Parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus): evidence for individual vocal recognition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 43, 197-202. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4601505Wanker, R., Cruz Bernate, L. y Franck, D. (1996). Socialization of Spectacled Parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus): The role of parents, creches and sibling groups in nature. Journal für Ornithologie, 137, 447-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01661101Núm. 1 , Año 2021 : Enero - Juniohttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/boletincientifico/article/download/4335/3985https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Cruz Bernate, Lorenaoai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/229772025-10-08T21:03:02Z

¿Ser dominante trae ventajas? Posición jerárquica, sitios de anidación y éxito reproductivo en Forpus conspicillatus (Aves: Psittacidae)

Publicaciones similares