El Realismo Científico y la Mente

El Realismo Científico Estándar sostiene el enfoque metafísico de que el mundo es como es independiente de la mente. Sin embargo, el presente artículo demuestra cómo esta postura es incompatible con todas las teorías no-eliminativistas sobre la mente, lo cual hace que la postura sea inconsistente, i...

Full description

Autores:

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2022

Institución:: Universidad de Caldas

Repositorio:: Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas

Idioma:: spa

id	REPOUCALDA_ad4d1363c01195d21a3de5c138462172
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/23949
network_acronym_str	REPOUCALDA
network_name_str	Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv	El Realismo Científico y la Mente Scientific Realism and Mind
title	El Realismo Científico y la Mente
spellingShingle	El Realismo Científico y la Mente Metafísica realismo científico consciencia mente ciencia metaphysics scientific realism consciousness mind science
title_short	El Realismo Científico y la Mente
title_full	El Realismo Científico y la Mente
title_fullStr	El Realismo Científico y la Mente
title_full_unstemmed	El Realismo Científico y la Mente
title_sort	El Realismo Científico y la Mente
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv	Metafísica realismo científico consciencia mente ciencia metaphysics scientific realism consciousness mind science
topic	Metafísica realismo científico consciencia mente ciencia metaphysics scientific realism consciousness mind science
description	El Realismo Científico Estándar sostiene el enfoque metafísico de que el mundo es como es independiente de la mente. Sin embargo, el presente artículo demuestra cómo esta postura es incompatible con todas las teorías no-eliminativistas sobre la mente, lo cual hace que la postura sea inconsistente, incompatible con la ciencia, elimina la consciencia, la intencionalidad, la causación mental y la ética. Se propone una tesis realista alternativa que conserva la idea de que el mundo en general es de la forma que es, independiente de lo que pensemos sobre él, compatible con la mente como parte real del mundo. Este cambio restaura la posibilidad de consistencia, la mente, la consciencia, la intencionalidad, la ciencia y la ética.
publishDate	2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv	2022-01-01 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z 2025-10-08T21:22:10Z 2025-10-08T21:22:10Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Text info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv	0124-6127 https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/23949 10.17151/difil.2023.24.42.5 2462-9596 https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2023.24.42.5
identifier_str_mv	0124-6127 10.17151/difil.2023.24.42.5 2462-9596
url	https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/23949 https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2023.24.42.5
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv	95 42 75 24 Discusiones Filosóficas Amer, Karim & Jehane Noujaim. The Great Hack. Netflix, 2019. Arendt, Hannah. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. Penguin, 1963. Berkeley, George. Principles of Human Knowledge. Penguin, 1710/2004. Block, Ned. “Introduction: What is Functionalism?” In Readings in Philosophy of Psychology vol. 1. Harvard University Press, 1980, pp. 171-184. Cárdenas Castañeda, Leonardo. “La Inferencia a la Mejor Explicación en el Debate Realismo/Anti-realismo.” Discusiones Filosóficas 12, 2011, pp. 89-105. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/difil/v12n18/v12n18a04.pdf Carnap, Rudolph, Hans Hahn & Neurath, Otto. The Scientific World Conception: The Vienna Circle. Ernest Mach Society, 1929. Chalmers, David. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press, 1996. Chakravartty, Anjan. “Scientific Realism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2017. Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/scientific-realism/>. Chomsky, Noam. “Biolingüística y Capacidad Humana.” Forma y Función, 19, 2006, pp. 57-71. Costa, Petra. The Edge of Democracy. Netflix, 2019. Descartes, René. The Philosophical Works of Descartes. Cambridge University Press, 1641/1911. Eddington, Arthur. The Nature of the Physical World. Cambridge University Press, 1928. Einstein, A. The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. John Stachel, et al. eds. Princeton University Press, 1987. Einstein, A. “The Theory of the Affine Field.” Nature, 112, 1923, pp. 448-449. https://www.nature.com/articles/112448a0 Fleetwood, Steve. “Bhaskar and Critical Realism.” Oxford Handbook on Contemporary Sociology, Social Theory and Organizational Studies. Oxford University Press. Giovanelli, Marco. “Einstein’s Philosophy of Science.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2019. Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/einstein-philscience/ Greenwald, Glenn. “NSA Collecting Data on Millions of Verizon Customers Daily.” The Guardian, 2013. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/06/nsa-phone-records-verizon-court-order Hempel, Carl. “The Logical Analysis of Psychology.” In Ned Block, Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology. Harvard University Press, 1935/1980. Herman, Edward & Noam Chomsky. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of Mass Media. Pantheon, 1988/2002. Jackson, F. “What Mary Did Not Know.” Journal of Philosophy, 83, No. 5, 1986, pp. 291-295. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-362X%28198605%2983%3A5%3C291%3AWMDK%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Z Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2013. Kastrup, Bernardo. “The Universe in Consciousness.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 25, 2018, pp. 125-155. https://www.imprint.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Kastrup_Open_Access.pdf Kim, Jaegwon. Physicalism, or Something Near Enough. Princeton University Press, 2005. Lewis, David. “Psychophysical and Theoretical Identifications.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 50, 1972, pp. 249–258. https://andrewmbailey.com/dkl/Psychophysical_and_Theoretical.pdf Macdonald, Cynthia & Graham Macdonald. 2006. “The Metaphysics of Mental Causation.” The Journal of Philosophy, 103, pp. 539-576. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20061031110 Penrose, Roger. The Emperor’s New Mind. Oxford University Press, 1989. Pereboom, Derk. “Robust Nonreductive Materialism.” Journal of Philosophy, 99, 2002, pp. 499–531. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3655563 Plato. Theatetus. Oxford University Press, 369BC/2014. Popper, Karl & John Eccles. The Self and Its Brain. Springer, 1977. Psillos, Stathis. “Scientific Realism and Metaphysics.” Knowing the Structure of Nature. Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234666_2 Psillos, Stathis. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. Routledge, 1999. Railton, Peter. “Moral Realism.” Philosophical Review, 95, 1986, pp. 163–207. Ramsey, William. “Eliminative Materialism.” Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, 2019. Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/materialism-eliminative/ Russell, Bertrand. The Analysis of Matter. Routledge, 1927/2001. Sankey, Howard. “Ciencia, Sentido Común y Realidad.” Discusiones Filosóficas 11, 2010, pp. 41-58. Smart, JJC. “Sensations and Brain Processes.” The Philosophical Review, 68, 1959, pp. 141-156. Turing, Alan. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind, 59, 1950, pp. 433–460. https://academic.oup.com/mind/article/LIX/236/433/986238 Van Fraassen, Bas. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wittengstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., 1922. Yablo, Stephen. “The Real Distinction Between Mind and Body.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 20, 1990, pp. 149-201. DOI: 10.1080/00455091.1990.10717225 Núm. 42 , Año 2023 : Enero - Junio https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/8520/6987
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Caldas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Caldas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/8520
institution	Universidad de Caldas
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_	1855532573257629696
spelling	El Realismo Científico y la MenteScientific Realism and MindMetafísicarealismo científicoconscienciamentecienciametaphysicsscientific realismconsciousnessmindscienceEl Realismo Científico Estándar sostiene el enfoque metafísico de que el mundo es como es independiente de la mente. Sin embargo, el presente artículo demuestra cómo esta postura es incompatible con todas las teorías no-eliminativistas sobre la mente, lo cual hace que la postura sea inconsistente, incompatible con la ciencia, elimina la consciencia, la intencionalidad, la causación mental y la ética. Se propone una tesis realista alternativa que conserva la idea de que el mundo en general es de la forma que es, independiente de lo que pensemos sobre él, compatible con la mente como parte real del mundo. Este cambio restaura la posibilidad de consistencia, la mente, la consciencia, la intencionalidad, la ciencia y la ética.Standard Scientific Realism holds the metaphysical view that the world is the way it is independent of the mind. However, this paper demonstrates how this view is incompatible with all noneliminativist theories of mind, leading it to be inconsistent, incompatible with science, and eliminating consciousness, intentionality, mental causation and ethics. An alternative realist thesis is proposed which preserves the idea that generally the world is the way it is independent of what we think of it, compatible with mind as a real part of the world. This reform restores the possibility of consistency, mind, consciousness, intentionality, science and ethics.Universidad de Caldas2023-01-01T00:00:00Z2025-10-08T21:22:10Z2023-01-01T00:00:00Z2025-10-08T21:22:10Z2022-01-01Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1application/pdf0124-6127https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/2394910.17151/difil.2023.24.42.52462-9596https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2023.24.42.5https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/8520spa95427524Discusiones FilosóficasAmer, Karim & Jehane Noujaim. The Great Hack. Netflix, 2019.Arendt, Hannah. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. Penguin, 1963.Berkeley, George. Principles of Human Knowledge. Penguin, 1710/2004.Block, Ned. “Introduction: What is Functionalism?” In Readings in Philosophy of Psychology vol. 1. Harvard University Press, 1980, pp. 171-184.Cárdenas Castañeda, Leonardo. “La Inferencia a la Mejor Explicación en el Debate Realismo/Anti-realismo.” Discusiones Filosóficas 12, 2011, pp. 89-105. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/difil/v12n18/v12n18a04.pdfCarnap, Rudolph, Hans Hahn & Neurath, Otto. The Scientific World Conception: The Vienna Circle. Ernest Mach Society, 1929.Chalmers, David. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press, 1996.Chakravartty, Anjan. “Scientific Realism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2017. Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/scientific-realism/>.Chomsky, Noam. “Biolingüística y Capacidad Humana.” Forma y Función, 19, 2006, pp. 57-71.Costa, Petra. The Edge of Democracy. Netflix, 2019.Descartes, René. The Philosophical Works of Descartes. Cambridge University Press, 1641/1911.Eddington, Arthur. The Nature of the Physical World. Cambridge University Press, 1928.Einstein, A. The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. John Stachel, et al. eds. Princeton University Press, 1987.Einstein, A. “The Theory of the Affine Field.” Nature, 112, 1923, pp. 448-449. https://www.nature.com/articles/112448a0Fleetwood, Steve. “Bhaskar and Critical Realism.” Oxford Handbook on Contemporary Sociology, Social Theory and Organizational Studies. Oxford University Press.Giovanelli, Marco. “Einstein’s Philosophy of Science.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2019. Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/einstein-philscience/Greenwald, Glenn. “NSA Collecting Data on Millions of Verizon Customers Daily.” The Guardian, 2013. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/06/nsa-phone-records-verizon-court-orderHempel, Carl. “The Logical Analysis of Psychology.” In Ned Block, Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology. Harvard University Press, 1935/1980.Herman, Edward & Noam Chomsky. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of Mass Media. Pantheon, 1988/2002.Jackson, F. “What Mary Did Not Know.” Journal of Philosophy, 83, No. 5, 1986, pp. 291-295. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-362X%28198605%2983%3A5%3C291%3AWMDK%3E2.0.CO%3B2-ZKahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2013.Kastrup, Bernardo. “The Universe in Consciousness.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 25, 2018, pp. 125-155. https://www.imprint.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Kastrup_Open_Access.pdfKim, Jaegwon. Physicalism, or Something Near Enough. Princeton University Press, 2005.Lewis, David. “Psychophysical and Theoretical Identifications.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 50, 1972, pp. 249–258. https://andrewmbailey.com/dkl/Psychophysical_and_Theoretical.pdfMacdonald, Cynthia & Graham Macdonald. 2006. “The Metaphysics of Mental Causation.” The Journal of Philosophy, 103, pp. 539-576. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20061031110Penrose, Roger. The Emperor’s New Mind. Oxford University Press, 1989.Pereboom, Derk. “Robust Nonreductive Materialism.” Journal of Philosophy, 99, 2002, pp. 499–531. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3655563Plato. Theatetus. Oxford University Press, 369BC/2014.Popper, Karl & John Eccles. The Self and Its Brain. Springer, 1977.Psillos, Stathis. “Scientific Realism and Metaphysics.” Knowing the Structure of Nature. Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234666_2Psillos, Stathis. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. Routledge, 1999.Railton, Peter. “Moral Realism.” Philosophical Review, 95, 1986, pp. 163–207.Ramsey, William. “Eliminative Materialism.” Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, 2019. Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/materialism-eliminative/Russell, Bertrand. The Analysis of Matter. Routledge, 1927/2001.Sankey, Howard. “Ciencia, Sentido Común y Realidad.” Discusiones Filosóficas 11, 2010, pp. 41-58.Smart, JJC. “Sensations and Brain Processes.” The Philosophical Review, 68, 1959, pp. 141-156.Turing, Alan. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind, 59, 1950, pp. 433–460. https://academic.oup.com/mind/article/LIX/236/433/986238Van Fraassen, Bas. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Wittengstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., 1922.Yablo, Stephen. “The Real Distinction Between Mind and Body.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 20, 1990, pp. 149-201. DOI: 10.1080/00455091.1990.10717225Núm. 42 , Año 2023 : Enero - Juniohttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/8520/6987https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Restrepo Echavarría, Ricardooai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/239492025-10-08T21:22:10Z

El Realismo Científico y la Mente

Publicaciones similares