Thomas Kuhn y el problema del holismo

Este artículo examina críticamente las implicaciones del holismo semántico en la obra de Thomas Kuhn y su relevancia para el problema de la inconmensurabilidad entre teorías científicas. Aunque a menudo se lo considera un aliado, el holismo en realidad presenta un gran desafío para Kuhn. Se identifi...

Full description

Autores:

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2024

Institución:: Universidad de Caldas

Repositorio:: Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas

Idioma:: spa

id	REPOUCALDA_a670fc243440be881b0536d9fb47bd9e
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/23983
network_acronym_str	REPOUCALDA
network_name_str	Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv	Thomas Kuhn y el problema del holismo Thomas Kuhn and the problem of holism
title	Thomas Kuhn y el problema del holismo
spellingShingle	Thomas Kuhn y el problema del holismo Holismo inconmensurabilidad comunicación distinción analítico/sintético contrafácticos Holism incommensurability communication analytic/synthetic distinction counterfactuals
title_short	Thomas Kuhn y el problema del holismo
title_full	Thomas Kuhn y el problema del holismo
title_fullStr	Thomas Kuhn y el problema del holismo
title_full_unstemmed	Thomas Kuhn y el problema del holismo
title_sort	Thomas Kuhn y el problema del holismo
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv	Holismo inconmensurabilidad comunicación distinción analítico/sintético contrafácticos Holism incommensurability communication analytic/synthetic distinction counterfactuals
topic	Holismo inconmensurabilidad comunicación distinción analítico/sintético contrafácticos Holism incommensurability communication analytic/synthetic distinction counterfactuals
description	Este artículo examina críticamente las implicaciones del holismo semántico en la obra de Thomas Kuhn y su relevancia para el problema de la inconmensurabilidad entre teorías científicas. Aunque a menudo se lo considera un aliado, el holismo en realidad presenta un gran desafío para Kuhn. Se identifican dos variantes de este problema con respuestas explícitas proporcionadas por Kuhn para la primera variante, pero ninguna respuesta directa para la segunda. La primera variante del problema es la imposibilidad de comunicación entre hablantes con diferencias doxásticas. Kuhn propone la adopción de la tesis del holismo local como solución a la primera variante. La segunda variante se refiere a la adopción indeseada de la distinción analítico/sintético. Sostengo que la solución a la segunda variante implica conectar el significado con la resolución de problemas. Propongo la aceptación o rechazo de enunciados contrafácticos como criterio para establecer referentes compartidos.
publishDate	2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv	2024-07-01T00:00:00Z 2024-07-01T00:00:00Z 2024-07-01 2025-10-08T21:22:25Z 2025-10-08T21:22:25Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Text info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv	0124-6127 https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/23983 10.17151/difil.2024.25.45.4 2462-9596 https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2024.25.45.4
identifier_str_mv	0124-6127 10.17151/difil.2024.25.45.4 2462-9596
url	https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/23983 https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2024.25.45.4
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv	94 45 67 25 Discusiones Filosóficas Bird, A. (2000). Thomas Kuhn. Acumen. Bird, A. (2002). Kuhn’s Wrong Turning. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 33(3), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00028-6 Block, N. (1998). Holism, Mental and Semantic. En E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 3622–3627). Routledge. Brandom, R. (1994). Make it Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Harvard University Press. Atencia Conde-Pumpido, P. (2025). Extendiendo la Genealogía de la Semántica de Thomas Kuhn. Una Mirada a las Conferencias Lowell y la Estructura de las Revoluciones Científicas. Estudios de Filosofía, 72.https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.358023 Davidson, D. (2001a). On the Very Idea of Conceptual Scheme. En Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (pp. 183–198). Oxford University Press. Davidson, D. (2001b). The Method of Truth in Metaphysics. En Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (pp. 199–214). Oxford University Press. Davidson, D. (2001c). Truth and Meaning. En Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (pp. 17–36). Oxford University Press. Davidson, D. (2004). The Problem of Objectivity. En Problems of Rationality (pp. 3–18). Oxford University Press. Demir, I. (2008). Incommensurabilities in the work of Thomas Kuhn.Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 39(1), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.11.011 Flórez Quintero, D. T. (2021). La tesis de la inconmensurabilidad de teorías: Desafíos e implicaciones. Universidad de Caldas. Fodor, J., & Lepore, E. (1992). Holism: A Shopper’s Guide. Blackwell. Fuller, T. (2020). Confirmation and Meaning Holism Revisited. Erkenntnis, 85(6), 1379–1397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-018-0082-9 Giri, L., Cervieri, I., & Melogno, P. (Eds.). (2025). Thomas Kuhn y el cambio revolucionario: Una mirada a las conferencias Notre Dame. Universidad de la República. Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1990). Kuhn’s Conception of Incommensurability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 21(3), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(90)90006-T Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1993). Reconstructing scientific revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn’s philosophy of science. University of Chicago Press. Kitcher, P. (1978). Theories, Theorists and Theoretical Change. The Philosophical Review, 87(4), 519–547. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184458 Kuhn, T. (1961). The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science. En The Essential Tension (pp. 178–224). University of Chicago Press. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press. Kuhn, T. (1970a). Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research? En The Essential Tension (pp. 266–292). University of Chicago Press. Kuhn, T. (1970b). Postscript-1969. En The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Second, pp. 174–210). University of Chicago Press. Kuhn, T. (1970c). Reflections on my Critics. En J. Conant & J. Haugeland (Eds.), The Road Since Structure (pp. 123–175). University of Chicago Press. Kuhn, T. (1974). Second Thoughts on Paradigms. En The Essential Tension (pp. 293–319). University of Chicago Press. Kuhn, T. (1976). The Relations between the History and the Philosophy of Science. En The Essential Tension (pp. 3–20). University of Chicago Press. Kuhn, T. (1980). The Natures of Conceptual Change. University of Notre Dame, 1980, November 17-21. Thomas Kuhn Papers, Box: 12. Massachusetss Institute of Technology, Department of Distinctive Collections. Kuhn, T. (1981). What Are Scientific Revolutions? En J. Conant & J. Haugeland (Eds.), The Road Since Structure (pp. 13–32). University of Chicago Press. En J. Conant & J. Haugeland (Eds.), The Road Since Structure (pp. 33–57). University of Chicago Press. Kuhn, T. (1989). Possible Worlds in History of Science. En J. Conant & J. Haugeland (Eds.), The Road Since Structure (pp. 58–89). University of Chicago Press. Kuhn, T. (1997). A Discussion with Thomas Kuhn. En J. Conant & J. Haugeland (Eds.), The Road Since Structure (pp. 255–323). University of Chicago Press. Kuhn, T. (1999). Remarks on Incommensurabilty and Translation. En R. Favretti, G. Sandri, & R. Scazzieri (Eds.), Incommensurability and Translation: Kuhnian Perspectives on Scientific Communication and Theory Change (pp. 33–37). Edward Elgar Publishing. Kuhn, T. (2017). Desarrollo científico y cambio de léxico. Conferencias Thalheimer (P. Melogno & H. Miguel, Eds.; L. Giri, Trad.). Facultad de Información y Comunicación, Universidad de la República Uruguay. Kuhn, T. (2021). The Quest for Physical Theory: Problems in the Methodology of Scientific Research. Lowell Lectures (G. Reisch, Ed.). The MIT Libraries, Department of Distinctive Collections. Kuhn, T. (2022). The Last Writings of Thomas S. Kuhn: Incommensurability in Science (B. Mladenović, Ed.). University of Chicago Press. Malone, M. E. (1993). Kuhn reconstructed: Incommensurability without relativism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 24(1), 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(93)90025-F Melogno, P. (2019). The Discovery-Justification Distinction and the New Historiography of Science: On Thomas Kuhn’s Thalheimer Lectures. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 9(1), 152–178. https://doi.org/10.1086/702308 Melogno, P., & Giri, L. (2023). Towards a Genealogy of Thomas Kuhn’s Semantics. Perspectives on Science, 31(4), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00591 Oberheim, E. (2023). Incommensurability and Metaincommensurability. Kind Change, World Change and Indirect Refutation. En L. Giri, P. Melogno, & H. Miguel (Eds.), Perspectives on Kuhn. Contemporary Approaches to the Philosophy of Thomas Kuhn (pp. 93–125). Springer. Oberheim, E., & Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2018). The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories. En E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/incommensurability/ Pérez Ransanz, A. R. (1999). Kuhn y el cambio científico. Fondo de Cultura Económica. Preston, J. (2008). Kuhn’s The structure of scientific revolutions: A reader’s guide. Continuum. Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, Truth, and History. Cambridge University Press. Quine, W. V. (1951). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. The Philosophical Review, 60(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/2181906 Rivera-Novoa, A. (2018). Holismo intencional y el problema de la comunicación. Ideas y Valores, 67, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v67n4Supl.73373 Rivera-Novoa, A. (2020). Relativismo sin esquemas conceptuales. Ideas y Valores, 69(173), 77-102. https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores. v69n173.63132 Rivera-Novoa, A. (2021). Inconmensurabilidad, intraducibilidad e intensionalidad: Una discusión entre Thomas Kuhn y Donald Davidson. Cuadernos de Filosofía, 38, 99–117. https://doi.org/10.29393/CF38-4ARII10004 Sankey, H. (1993). Kuhn’s Changing Concept of Incommensurability.The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44(4), 759–774. https:// doi.org/10.1093/bjps/44.4.759 Sankey, H. (2013). Methodological Incommensurability and Epistemic Relativism. Topoi, 32(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-012-9139-6 Sankey, H., & Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2001). Introduction. En P.Hoyningen-Huene & H. Sankey (Eds.), Incommensurability and Related Matters (pp. vii–xxxiv). Kluwer. Shan, Y. (2020). Kuhn’s “wrong turning” and legacy today. Synthese, 197(1), 381–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1740-9 Wang, X. (2002). Taxonomy, Truth-Value Gaps and Incommensurability: A Reconstruction of Kuhn’s Taxonomic Interpretation of Incommensurability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 33(3), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(01)00039-5 Wray, K. B. (2021). Kuhn’s intellectual path: Charting The structure of scientific revolutions. Cambridge University Press. Núm. 45 , Año 2024 : Julio - Diciembre https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/10403/7892
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Caldas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Caldas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/10403
institution	Universidad de Caldas
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_	1855532586512678912
spelling	Thomas Kuhn y el problema del holismoThomas Kuhn and the problem of holismHolismoinconmensurabilidadcomunicacióndistinción analítico/sintéticocontrafácticosHolismincommensurabilitycommunicationanalytic/synthetic distinctioncounterfactualsEste artículo examina críticamente las implicaciones del holismo semántico en la obra de Thomas Kuhn y su relevancia para el problema de la inconmensurabilidad entre teorías científicas. Aunque a menudo se lo considera un aliado, el holismo en realidad presenta un gran desafío para Kuhn. Se identifican dos variantes de este problema con respuestas explícitas proporcionadas por Kuhn para la primera variante, pero ninguna respuesta directa para la segunda. La primera variante del problema es la imposibilidad de comunicación entre hablantes con diferencias doxásticas. Kuhn propone la adopción de la tesis del holismo local como solución a la primera variante. La segunda variante se refiere a la adopción indeseada de la distinción analítico/sintético. Sostengo que la solución a la segunda variante implica conectar el significado con la resolución de problemas. Propongo la aceptación o rechazo de enunciados contrafácticos como criterio para establecer referentes compartidos.This paper critically examines the implications of semantic holism in Thomas Kuhn’s work and its relevance to the problem of incommensurability between scientific theories. While often viewed as an ally, holism actually presents a strong challenge for Kuhn. Two variants of this problem are identified, with explicit answers provided by Kuhn for the first variant but no direct response for the second. The first variant of the problem is the impossibility of communication between speakers with doxastic differences. Kuhn proposes the adoption of the local holism thesis as a solution to the first variant. The second variant concerns the undesirable endorsement of the analytic/synthetic distinction. I contend that the solution to the second variant involves connecting meaning with problem-solving. I propose the acceptance or rejection of counterfactual statements as a criterion for establishing shared referents.Universidad de Caldas2024-07-01T00:00:00Z2025-10-08T21:22:25Z2024-07-01T00:00:00Z2025-10-08T21:22:25Z2024-07-01Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1application/pdf0124-6127https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/2398310.17151/difil.2024.25.45.42462-9596https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2024.25.45.4https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/10403spa94456725Discusiones FilosóficasBird, A. (2000). Thomas Kuhn. Acumen.Bird, A. (2002). Kuhn’s Wrong Turning. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 33(3), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00028-6Block, N. (1998). Holism, Mental and Semantic. En E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 3622–3627). Routledge.Brandom, R. (1994). Make it Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Harvard University Press.Atencia Conde-Pumpido, P. (2025). Extendiendo la Genealogía de la Semántica de Thomas Kuhn. Una Mirada a las Conferencias Lowell y la Estructura de las Revoluciones Científicas. Estudios de Filosofía, 72.https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.358023Davidson, D. (2001a). On the Very Idea of Conceptual Scheme. En Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (pp. 183–198). Oxford University Press.Davidson, D. (2001b). The Method of Truth in Metaphysics. En Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (pp. 199–214). Oxford University Press.Davidson, D. (2001c). Truth and Meaning. En Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (pp. 17–36). Oxford University Press.Davidson, D. (2004). The Problem of Objectivity. En Problems of Rationality (pp. 3–18). Oxford University Press.Demir, I. (2008). Incommensurabilities in the work of Thomas Kuhn.Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 39(1), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.11.011Flórez Quintero, D. T. (2021). La tesis de la inconmensurabilidad de teorías: Desafíos e implicaciones. Universidad de Caldas.Fodor, J., & Lepore, E. (1992). Holism: A Shopper’s Guide. Blackwell.Fuller, T. (2020). Confirmation and Meaning Holism Revisited. Erkenntnis, 85(6), 1379–1397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-018-0082-9Giri, L., Cervieri, I., & Melogno, P. (Eds.). (2025). Thomas Kuhn y el cambio revolucionario: Una mirada a las conferencias Notre Dame. Universidad de la República.Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1990). Kuhn’s Conception of Incommensurability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 21(3), 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(90)90006-THoyningen-Huene, P. (1993). Reconstructing scientific revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn’s philosophy of science. University of Chicago Press. Kitcher, P. (1978). Theories, Theorists and Theoretical Change. The Philosophical Review, 87(4), 519–547. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184458Kuhn, T. (1961). The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science. En The Essential Tension (pp. 178–224). University of Chicago Press.Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.Kuhn, T. (1970a). Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research? En The Essential Tension (pp. 266–292). University of Chicago Press.Kuhn, T. (1970b). Postscript-1969. En The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Second, pp. 174–210). University of Chicago Press.Kuhn, T. (1970c). Reflections on my Critics. En J. Conant & J. Haugeland (Eds.), The Road Since Structure (pp. 123–175). University of Chicago Press.Kuhn, T. (1974). Second Thoughts on Paradigms. En The Essential Tension (pp. 293–319). University of Chicago Press.Kuhn, T. (1976). The Relations between the History and the Philosophy of Science. En The Essential Tension (pp. 3–20). University of Chicago Press.Kuhn, T. (1980). The Natures of Conceptual Change. University of Notre Dame, 1980, November 17-21. Thomas Kuhn Papers, Box: 12. Massachusetss Institute of Technology, Department of Distinctive Collections.Kuhn, T. (1981). What Are Scientific Revolutions? En J. Conant & J. Haugeland (Eds.), The Road Since Structure (pp. 13–32). University of Chicago Press. En J. Conant & J. Haugeland (Eds.), The Road Since Structure (pp. 33–57). University of Chicago Press.Kuhn, T. (1989). Possible Worlds in History of Science. En J. Conant & J. Haugeland (Eds.), The Road Since Structure (pp. 58–89). University of Chicago Press.Kuhn, T. (1997). A Discussion with Thomas Kuhn. En J. Conant & J. Haugeland (Eds.), The Road Since Structure (pp. 255–323). University of Chicago Press.Kuhn, T. (1999). Remarks on Incommensurabilty and Translation. En R. Favretti, G. Sandri, & R. Scazzieri (Eds.), Incommensurability and Translation: Kuhnian Perspectives on Scientific Communication and Theory Change (pp. 33–37). Edward Elgar Publishing.Kuhn, T. (2017). Desarrollo científico y cambio de léxico. Conferencias Thalheimer (P. Melogno & H. Miguel, Eds.; L. Giri, Trad.). Facultad de Información y Comunicación, Universidad de la República Uruguay.Kuhn, T. (2021). The Quest for Physical Theory: Problems in the Methodology of Scientific Research. Lowell Lectures (G. Reisch, Ed.). The MIT Libraries, Department of Distinctive Collections.Kuhn, T. (2022). The Last Writings of Thomas S. Kuhn: Incommensurability in Science (B. Mladenović, Ed.). University of Chicago Press.Malone, M. E. (1993). Kuhn reconstructed: Incommensurability without relativism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 24(1), 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(93)90025-FMelogno, P. (2019). The Discovery-Justification Distinction and the New Historiography of Science: On Thomas Kuhn’s Thalheimer Lectures. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 9(1), 152–178. https://doi.org/10.1086/702308Melogno, P., & Giri, L. (2023). Towards a Genealogy of Thomas Kuhn’s Semantics. Perspectives on Science, 31(4), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00591Oberheim, E. (2023). Incommensurability and Metaincommensurability. Kind Change, World Change and Indirect Refutation. En L. Giri, P. Melogno, & H. Miguel (Eds.), Perspectives on Kuhn. Contemporary Approaches to the Philosophy of Thomas Kuhn (pp. 93–125). Springer.Oberheim, E., & Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2018). The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories. En E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/incommensurability/Pérez Ransanz, A. R. (1999). Kuhn y el cambio científico. Fondo de Cultura Económica.Preston, J. (2008). Kuhn’s The structure of scientific revolutions: A reader’s guide. Continuum.Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, Truth, and History. Cambridge University Press.Quine, W. V. (1951). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. The Philosophical Review, 60(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/2181906Rivera-Novoa, A. (2018). Holismo intencional y el problema de la comunicación. Ideas y Valores, 67, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v67n4Supl.73373Rivera-Novoa, A. (2020). Relativismo sin esquemas conceptuales. Ideas y Valores, 69(173), 77-102. https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores. v69n173.63132Rivera-Novoa, A. (2021). Inconmensurabilidad, intraducibilidad e intensionalidad: Una discusión entre Thomas Kuhn y Donald Davidson. Cuadernos de Filosofía, 38, 99–117. https://doi.org/10.29393/CF38-4ARII10004Sankey, H. (1993). Kuhn’s Changing Concept of Incommensurability.The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44(4), 759–774. https:// doi.org/10.1093/bjps/44.4.759Sankey, H. (2013). Methodological Incommensurability and Epistemic Relativism. Topoi, 32(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-012-9139-6Sankey, H., & Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2001). Introduction. En P.Hoyningen-Huene & H. Sankey (Eds.), Incommensurability and Related Matters (pp. vii–xxxiv). Kluwer.Shan, Y. (2020). Kuhn’s “wrong turning” and legacy today. Synthese, 197(1), 381–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1740-9Wang, X. (2002). Taxonomy, Truth-Value Gaps and Incommensurability: A Reconstruction of Kuhn’s Taxonomic Interpretation of Incommensurability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 33(3), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(01)00039-5Wray, K. B. (2021). Kuhn’s intellectual path: Charting The structure of scientific revolutions. Cambridge University Press.Núm. 45 , Año 2024 : Julio - Diciembrehttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/10403/7892https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Rivera-Novoa, Angeloai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/239832025-10-08T21:22:25Z

Thomas Kuhn y el problema del holismo

Publicaciones similares