Sustentabilidad ambiental rural y servicios ecosistémicos: una revisión

Los servicios ecosistémicos tienen un rol preponderante para explicar la sustentabilidad ambiental rural, al incidir en el estado de bienestar y relaciones sociales, que condicionan la capacidad en estas zonas para garantizar la sustentabilidad ambiental. En este trabajo investigativo de revisión se...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2022
Institución:
Universidad de Caldas
Repositorio:
Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/23603
Acceso en línea:
https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/23603
https://doi.org/10.17151/luaz.2023.56.3
Palabra clave:
sostenibilidad ambiental
servicios ambientales
agricultura tradicional
environmental sustainability
environmental services
traditional agriculture
Rights
openAccess
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
id REPOUCALDA_96fe74129fc725e448aa7109de23ac88
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/23603
network_acronym_str REPOUCALDA
network_name_str Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sustentabilidad ambiental rural y servicios ecosistémicos: una revisión
Rural environmental sustainability and ecosystem services: a review
title Sustentabilidad ambiental rural y servicios ecosistémicos: una revisión
spellingShingle Sustentabilidad ambiental rural y servicios ecosistémicos: una revisión
sostenibilidad ambiental
servicios ambientales
agricultura tradicional
environmental sustainability
environmental services
traditional agriculture
title_short Sustentabilidad ambiental rural y servicios ecosistémicos: una revisión
title_full Sustentabilidad ambiental rural y servicios ecosistémicos: una revisión
title_fullStr Sustentabilidad ambiental rural y servicios ecosistémicos: una revisión
title_full_unstemmed Sustentabilidad ambiental rural y servicios ecosistémicos: una revisión
title_sort Sustentabilidad ambiental rural y servicios ecosistémicos: una revisión
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv sostenibilidad ambiental
servicios ambientales
agricultura tradicional
environmental sustainability
environmental services
traditional agriculture
topic sostenibilidad ambiental
servicios ambientales
agricultura tradicional
environmental sustainability
environmental services
traditional agriculture
description Los servicios ecosistémicos tienen un rol preponderante para explicar la sustentabilidad ambiental rural, al incidir en el estado de bienestar y relaciones sociales, que condicionan la capacidad en estas zonas para garantizar la sustentabilidad ambiental. En este trabajo investigativo de revisión se analizan los avances existentes, en torno a las formas de evaluación de los servicios ecosistémicos en la sustentabilidad ambiental rural. El estudio empleó las bases de datos de Scopus, ScienceDirect, Taylor & Francis y JSTOR, y se utilizó un marco de búsqueda de tres etapas: exploración, síntesis y análisis. Del total de casos de estudio, la suma de la frecuencia de citación fue de 200 veces, de estos el 57% de las citaciones correspondió a un servicio de aprovisionamiento, el 29% a un servicio de regulación y el 14% a un servicio cultural. Destacándose en los servicios de aprovisionamiento el suministro de cultivos (32,5%), en los servicios de regulación la conservación del suelo (41,38%) y en los servicios culturales el conocimiento tradicional (89%).
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
2025-10-08T21:12:51Z
2025-10-08T21:12:51Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Text
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Journal article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 0122-5391
https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/23603
10.17151/luaz.2023.56.3
1909-2474
https://doi.org/10.17151/luaz.2023.56.3
identifier_str_mv 0122-5391
10.17151/luaz.2023.56.3
1909-2474
url https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/23603
https://doi.org/10.17151/luaz.2023.56.3
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 46
56
27
Luna Azul
Abson, D., Von Wehrden, H., Baumgärtner, S., Fischer, J., Hanspach, J., Härdtle, W., Heinrichs, H., Klein, A. M., Lang, D. J., Martens, P. y Walmsley, D. (2014). Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 103, 29-37.
Agarwal, A., Durairajanayagam, D., Tatagari, S., Esteves, S. C., Harlev, A., Henkel, R., Roychoudhury, S., Homa, S., Puchalt, N. G., Ramasamy, R., Majzoub, A., Ly, K. D., Tvrda, E., Assidi, M., Kesari, K., Sharma, R., Banihani, S., Ko, E., Abu-Elmagd, M., Gosalvez, J. y Bashiri, A. (2016). Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian journal of andrology, 18(2), 296-309. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.171582
Arki, V., Koskikala, J., Fagerholm, N., Kisanga, D. y Käyhkö, N. (2020). Associations between local land use/land cover and place-based landscape service patterns in rural Tanzania. Ecosystem Services, 41, 101056.
Bai, Y., Jiang, B., Wang, M., Li, H., Alatalo, J. M. y Huang, S. (2016). New ecological redline policy (ERP) to secure ecosystem services in China. Land Use Policy, 55, 348-351.
Baskent, E. Z. (2020). A Framework for Characterizing and Regulating Ecosystem Services in a Management Planning Context. Forests, 11(1), 102.
Baudron, F., Mamo, A., Tirfessa, D. y Argaw, M. (2015). Impact of farmland exclosure on the productivity and sustainability of a mixed crop-livestock system in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 207, 109-118.
Bernard, P.-Y., Benoît, M., Roger-Estrade, J. y Plantureux, S. (2016). Using biophysical models to manage nitrogen pollution from agricultural sources: ¿Utopic or realistic approach for non-scientist users? Case study of a drinking water catchment area in Lorraine, France. Journal of Environmental Management, 183(Part 1), 260-274.
Bernués, A., Tello-García, E., Rodríguez-Ortega, T., Ripoll-Bosch, R. y Casasús, I. (2016). Agricultural practices, ecosystem services and sustainability in High Nature Value farmland: Unraveling the perceptions of farmers and nonfarmers. Land Use Policy, 59, 130-142.
Chen, X., Chen, Y., Shimizu, T., Niu, J., Nakagami, K., Qian, X., Jia, B., Nakajima, J., Han, J. y Li, J. (2017). Water resources management in the urban agglomeration of the Lake Biwa region, Japan: An ecosystem services-based sustainability assessment. Science of The Total Environment, 586, 174-187.
Cheng, X., Van Damme, S., Li, L. y Uyttenhove, P. (2019). Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: A review of methods. Ecosystem Services, 37, 100925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100925
Cook, D., Malinauskaite, L., Davíðsdóttir, B., Ögmundardóttir, H. y Roman, J. (2020). Reflections on the ecosystem services of whales and valuing their contribution to human well-being. Ocean & Coastal Management, 186, 105100.
Dang, K. B., Burkhard, B., Müller, F. y Dang, V. B. (2018). Modelling and mapping natural hazard regulating ecosystem services in Sapa, Lao Cai province, Vietnam. Paddy and Water Environment, 16(4), 767-781.
Dawson, N. M., Grogan, K., Martin, A., Mertz, O., Pasgaard, M. y Rasmussen, L. V. (2017). Environmental justice research shows the importance of social feedbacks in ecosystem service trade-offs. Ecology and Society, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09481-220312
De Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L. Hein, L. y Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision-making. Ecol. Complex., 7, 260-272.
De Lange, E., Woodhouse, E. y Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2015). Approaches used to evaluate the social impacts of protected areas. Conservation Letters, 9(5), 327-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/conl.12223
Diouf, A. y Hatvany, M. G. (2015). Terrestrial Ecosystem Dynamics in Senegal’s Agro-silvopastoral Center-East Region in the Second Half of the Twentieth Century. En B. Werlen (Ed.), Global Sustainability. Cultural Perspectives and Challenges for Transdisciplinary Integrated Research (pp. 139-160). Springer.
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A. y Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J, 22(2), 338-342.
Farber, S. C., Costanza, R. y Wilson, M. A. (2002). Conceptos económicos y ecológicos para valorar los servicios del ecosistema. Ecol Econ, 41(3), 375-392.
Feng, Z., Cui, Y., Zhang, H. y Gao, Y. (2018). Assessment of human consumption of ecosystem services in China from 2000 to 2014 based on an ecosystem service footprint model. Ecological Indicators, 94(Part 1), 468-481.
Franzluebbers, A. J. (2013). Pursuing robust agroecosystem functioning through effective soil organic carbon management. Carbon Management, 4(1), 43-56.
Gómez-Baggethun, E., Mingorría, S., Reyes-García, V., Calvet, L. y Montes, C. (2010). Traditional ecological knowledge trends in the transition to a market economy: empirical study in the Donana natural areas. Conserv. Biol., 24(3), 721-729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01401.x
Haase, D., Larondelle, N., Andersson, E., Artmann, M., Borgström, S., Breuste, J., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Gren, Å., Hamstead, Z., Hansen, R., Kabisch, N., Kremer, P., Langemeyer, J., Rall, E. L., McPhearson, T., Pauleit, S., Qureshi, S., Schwarz, N., Voigt, A., Wurster, D. y Elmqvist, T. (2014). A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation. Ambio, 43, 413-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0
Hallinger, P., Wang, R., Chatpinyakoop, C., Nguyen, V.-T. y Nguyen, U.-P. (2020). A bibliometric review of research on simulations and serious games used in educating for sustainability, 1997-2019. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120358.
Henke, J. M. y Petropoulos, G. P. (2013). A GIS-based exploration of the relationships between human health, social deprivation and ecosystem services: The case of Wales, UK. Applied Geography, 45, 77-88.
Kiraz, M. y Demir, E. (2020). A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Spinal Cord Injury During 1980-2018. World Neurosurgery, 136, e504-e513.
Landreth, N. y Saito, O. (2014). An Ecosystem Services Approach to Sustainable Livelihoods in the Homegardens of Kandy, Sri Lanka. Australian Geographer, 45(3), 355-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2014.930003
Lucas, P. L., Kok, M. T. J., Nilsson, M. y Alkemade, R. (2014). Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in the Post-2015 Development Agenda: Goal Structure, Target Areas and Means of Implementation. Sustainability, 6(1), 193-216. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6010193
Mengist, W., Soromessa, T. y Legese, G. (2020). Ecosystem services research in mountainous regions: A systematic literature review on current knowledge and research gaps. Science of the Total Environment, 702, 134581.
Naah, J.-S. y Guuroh, R. T. (2017). Factors influencing local ecological knowledge of forage resources: Ethnobotanical evidence from West Africa's savannas. Journal of Environmental Management, 188, 297-307.
Okolo, C. C., Dippold, M. A., Gebresamuel, G., Zenebe, A., Haile, M. y Bore, E. (2020). Assessing the sustainability of land use management of northern Ethiopian drylands by various indicators for soil health. Ecological Indicators, 112, 106092.
Palacios-Agundez, I., Onaindia, M., Barraqueta, P. y Madariaga, I. (2015). Provisioning ecosystem services supply and demand: The role of landscape management to reinforce supply and promote synergies with other ecosystem services. Land Use Policy, 47, 145-155.
Partelow, S. y Winkler, K. J. (2016). Interlinking ecosystem services and Ostrom’s framework through orientation in sustainability research. Ecology and Society, 21(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08524-210327
Pico-Mendoza, J., Pinoargote-Chang, M., Carrasco, B. y Limongi, R. (2020). Ecosystem services in certified and non-certified coffee agroforestry systems in Costa Rica. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 44(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2020.1713962
Potschin, M. y Haines-Young, R. (2013). Landscapes, sustainability and the place-based analysis of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology, 28, 1015-1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9756-x
Rincón-Ruiz, A., Echeverry, M. y Zuluaga, P. (2014). Valoración integral de la biodiversidad y los servicios ecosistémicos: Aspectos conceptuales y metodológicos. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH).
Romero-Díaz, A., De Vente, J. y Díaz-Pereira, E. (2019). Assessment of the ecosystem services provided by agricultural terraces. Pirineos, 174, e043.
Santos-Martin, F., Viinikka, A., Mononen, L., Brander, L. M., Vihervaara, P., Liekens, I. y Potschin-Young, M. (2018). Creating an operational database for Ecosystems Services Mapping and Assessment Methods. One Ecosystem, 3, e26719. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e26719
Silori, C. (2015). Ecosystem services and sustainable development: opportunities and challenges. The Center for People and Forests, Bangkok, Thailand.
Silvetti, F. (2011). Una revisión conceptual sobre la relación entre campesinos y servicios ecosistémicos. Cuadernos De Desarrollo Rural, 8(66), 19-45. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cdr8-66.rcsr
Tian, Q. (2017). Rural Sustainability. A Complex Systems Approach to Policy Analysis. Springer.
Vanzetto, G. V. y Thomé, A. (2019). Bibliometric study of the toxicology of nanoescale zero valent iron used in soil remediation. Environmental Pollution, 252(Part A), 74-83.
Vihervaara, P., Rönkä, M. y Walls, M. (2010). Trends in ecosystem service research: early steps and current drivers. Ambio, 39, 314-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0048-x
Vihervaara, P. et al. (2018). Biophysical mapping and assessment methods for ecosystem services. Deliverable D3.3 EU Horizon 2020 ESMERALDA Project, Grant agreement No. 642007.
Vihervaara, P., Viinikka, A., Brander, L., Santos-Martín, F., Poikolainen, L. y Nedkov, S. (2019). Methodological interlinkages for mapping ecosystem services – from data to analysis and decision-support. One Ecosystem, 4, e26368. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.4.e26368
Vogt, M. y Weber, C. (2019). Current challenges to the concept of sustainability. Global Sustainability, 2(e4), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2019.1
Wang, C., Zhang, Y., Yang, Y., Yang, Q., Kush, J., Xu, Y. y Xu, L. (2016). Assessment of sustainable livelihoods of different farmers in hilly red soil erosion areas of southern China. Ecological Indicators, 64, 123-131.
Waweru, P., Burkhard, B. y Müller, F. (2016). A review of studies on ecosystem services in África. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 5(2), 225-245.
Wegner, G. y Pascual, U. (2011). Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 492-504.
Winther, A. M. (2017). Community sustainability: a holistic approach to measuring the sustainability of rural communities in Scotland. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 24(4), 338-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2016.1224987
Wolff, S., Schulp, C. J. E. y Verburg, P. H. (2015). Mapping ecosystem services demand: a review of current research and future perspectives. Ecological Indicators, 55, 159-171.
Wu, J. (2013). Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecol, 28, 999-1023.
You, H. y Zhang, X. (2017). Sustainable livelihoods and rural sustainability in China: ¿Ecologically secure, economically efficient or socially equitable? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 120, 1-13.
Núm. 56 , Año 2023 : Enero-Junio
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/lunazul/article/download/9432/7606
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/lunazul/article/download/9432/7617
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Caldas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Caldas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/lunazul/article/view/9432
institution Universidad de Caldas
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1855532507731066880
spelling Sustentabilidad ambiental rural y servicios ecosistémicos: una revisiónRural environmental sustainability and ecosystem services: a reviewsostenibilidad ambientalservicios ambientalesagricultura tradicionalenvironmental sustainabilityenvironmental servicestraditional agricultureLos servicios ecosistémicos tienen un rol preponderante para explicar la sustentabilidad ambiental rural, al incidir en el estado de bienestar y relaciones sociales, que condicionan la capacidad en estas zonas para garantizar la sustentabilidad ambiental. En este trabajo investigativo de revisión se analizan los avances existentes, en torno a las formas de evaluación de los servicios ecosistémicos en la sustentabilidad ambiental rural. El estudio empleó las bases de datos de Scopus, ScienceDirect, Taylor & Francis y JSTOR, y se utilizó un marco de búsqueda de tres etapas: exploración, síntesis y análisis. Del total de casos de estudio, la suma de la frecuencia de citación fue de 200 veces, de estos el 57% de las citaciones correspondió a un servicio de aprovisionamiento, el 29% a un servicio de regulación y el 14% a un servicio cultural. Destacándose en los servicios de aprovisionamiento el suministro de cultivos (32,5%), en los servicios de regulación la conservación del suelo (41,38%) y en los servicios culturales el conocimiento tradicional (89%).Ecosystem services have a preponderant role to explain rural environmental sustainability, by influencing the welfare state and social relations, which condition the capacity in these areas to guarantee environmental sustainability. This investigative review work analyzes the existing advances, around the ways of evaluating ecosystem services in rural sustainability. The study used the databases of Scopus, ScienceDirect, Taylor & Francis and JSTOR, and a three-stage search framework was used: exploration, synthesis and analysis. Of the total number of case studies, the sum of the citation frequency was 200 times, of these, 57% of the citations corresponded to a provisioning service; 29% to a regulatory service; and 14% to a cultural service. Highlighting provisioning services: crop supply (32.5%); in regulatory services: soil conservation (41.38%), and in cultural services: traditional knowledge (89%).Universidad de Caldas2023-01-01T00:00:00Z2025-10-08T21:12:51Z2023-01-01T00:00:00Z2025-10-08T21:12:51Z2022-01-01Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1application/pdftext/html0122-5391https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/2360310.17151/luaz.2023.56.31909-2474https://doi.org/10.17151/luaz.2023.56.3https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/lunazul/article/view/9432spa465627Luna AzulAbson, D., Von Wehrden, H., Baumgärtner, S., Fischer, J., Hanspach, J., Härdtle, W., Heinrichs, H., Klein, A. M., Lang, D. J., Martens, P. y Walmsley, D. (2014). Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 103, 29-37.Agarwal, A., Durairajanayagam, D., Tatagari, S., Esteves, S. C., Harlev, A., Henkel, R., Roychoudhury, S., Homa, S., Puchalt, N. G., Ramasamy, R., Majzoub, A., Ly, K. D., Tvrda, E., Assidi, M., Kesari, K., Sharma, R., Banihani, S., Ko, E., Abu-Elmagd, M., Gosalvez, J. y Bashiri, A. (2016). Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian journal of andrology, 18(2), 296-309. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.171582Arki, V., Koskikala, J., Fagerholm, N., Kisanga, D. y Käyhkö, N. (2020). Associations between local land use/land cover and place-based landscape service patterns in rural Tanzania. Ecosystem Services, 41, 101056.Bai, Y., Jiang, B., Wang, M., Li, H., Alatalo, J. M. y Huang, S. (2016). New ecological redline policy (ERP) to secure ecosystem services in China. Land Use Policy, 55, 348-351.Baskent, E. Z. (2020). A Framework for Characterizing and Regulating Ecosystem Services in a Management Planning Context. Forests, 11(1), 102.Baudron, F., Mamo, A., Tirfessa, D. y Argaw, M. (2015). Impact of farmland exclosure on the productivity and sustainability of a mixed crop-livestock system in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 207, 109-118.Bernard, P.-Y., Benoît, M., Roger-Estrade, J. y Plantureux, S. (2016). Using biophysical models to manage nitrogen pollution from agricultural sources: ¿Utopic or realistic approach for non-scientist users? Case study of a drinking water catchment area in Lorraine, France. Journal of Environmental Management, 183(Part 1), 260-274.Bernués, A., Tello-García, E., Rodríguez-Ortega, T., Ripoll-Bosch, R. y Casasús, I. (2016). Agricultural practices, ecosystem services and sustainability in High Nature Value farmland: Unraveling the perceptions of farmers and nonfarmers. Land Use Policy, 59, 130-142.Chen, X., Chen, Y., Shimizu, T., Niu, J., Nakagami, K., Qian, X., Jia, B., Nakajima, J., Han, J. y Li, J. (2017). Water resources management in the urban agglomeration of the Lake Biwa region, Japan: An ecosystem services-based sustainability assessment. Science of The Total Environment, 586, 174-187.Cheng, X., Van Damme, S., Li, L. y Uyttenhove, P. (2019). Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: A review of methods. Ecosystem Services, 37, 100925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100925Cook, D., Malinauskaite, L., Davíðsdóttir, B., Ögmundardóttir, H. y Roman, J. (2020). Reflections on the ecosystem services of whales and valuing their contribution to human well-being. Ocean & Coastal Management, 186, 105100.Dang, K. B., Burkhard, B., Müller, F. y Dang, V. B. (2018). Modelling and mapping natural hazard regulating ecosystem services in Sapa, Lao Cai province, Vietnam. Paddy and Water Environment, 16(4), 767-781.Dawson, N. M., Grogan, K., Martin, A., Mertz, O., Pasgaard, M. y Rasmussen, L. V. (2017). Environmental justice research shows the importance of social feedbacks in ecosystem service trade-offs. Ecology and Society, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09481-220312De Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L. Hein, L. y Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision-making. Ecol. Complex., 7, 260-272.De Lange, E., Woodhouse, E. y Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2015). Approaches used to evaluate the social impacts of protected areas. Conservation Letters, 9(5), 327-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/conl.12223Diouf, A. y Hatvany, M. G. (2015). Terrestrial Ecosystem Dynamics in Senegal’s Agro-silvopastoral Center-East Region in the Second Half of the Twentieth Century. En B. Werlen (Ed.), Global Sustainability. Cultural Perspectives and Challenges for Transdisciplinary Integrated Research (pp. 139-160). Springer.Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A. y Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J, 22(2), 338-342.Farber, S. C., Costanza, R. y Wilson, M. A. (2002). Conceptos económicos y ecológicos para valorar los servicios del ecosistema. Ecol Econ, 41(3), 375-392.Feng, Z., Cui, Y., Zhang, H. y Gao, Y. (2018). Assessment of human consumption of ecosystem services in China from 2000 to 2014 based on an ecosystem service footprint model. Ecological Indicators, 94(Part 1), 468-481.Franzluebbers, A. J. (2013). Pursuing robust agroecosystem functioning through effective soil organic carbon management. Carbon Management, 4(1), 43-56.Gómez-Baggethun, E., Mingorría, S., Reyes-García, V., Calvet, L. y Montes, C. (2010). Traditional ecological knowledge trends in the transition to a market economy: empirical study in the Donana natural areas. Conserv. Biol., 24(3), 721-729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01401.xHaase, D., Larondelle, N., Andersson, E., Artmann, M., Borgström, S., Breuste, J., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Gren, Å., Hamstead, Z., Hansen, R., Kabisch, N., Kremer, P., Langemeyer, J., Rall, E. L., McPhearson, T., Pauleit, S., Qureshi, S., Schwarz, N., Voigt, A., Wurster, D. y Elmqvist, T. (2014). A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation. Ambio, 43, 413-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0Hallinger, P., Wang, R., Chatpinyakoop, C., Nguyen, V.-T. y Nguyen, U.-P. (2020). A bibliometric review of research on simulations and serious games used in educating for sustainability, 1997-2019. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120358.Henke, J. M. y Petropoulos, G. P. (2013). A GIS-based exploration of the relationships between human health, social deprivation and ecosystem services: The case of Wales, UK. Applied Geography, 45, 77-88.Kiraz, M. y Demir, E. (2020). A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Spinal Cord Injury During 1980-2018. World Neurosurgery, 136, e504-e513.Landreth, N. y Saito, O. (2014). An Ecosystem Services Approach to Sustainable Livelihoods in the Homegardens of Kandy, Sri Lanka. Australian Geographer, 45(3), 355-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2014.930003Lucas, P. L., Kok, M. T. J., Nilsson, M. y Alkemade, R. (2014). Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in the Post-2015 Development Agenda: Goal Structure, Target Areas and Means of Implementation. Sustainability, 6(1), 193-216. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6010193Mengist, W., Soromessa, T. y Legese, G. (2020). Ecosystem services research in mountainous regions: A systematic literature review on current knowledge and research gaps. Science of the Total Environment, 702, 134581.Naah, J.-S. y Guuroh, R. T. (2017). Factors influencing local ecological knowledge of forage resources: Ethnobotanical evidence from West Africa's savannas. Journal of Environmental Management, 188, 297-307.Okolo, C. C., Dippold, M. A., Gebresamuel, G., Zenebe, A., Haile, M. y Bore, E. (2020). Assessing the sustainability of land use management of northern Ethiopian drylands by various indicators for soil health. Ecological Indicators, 112, 106092.Palacios-Agundez, I., Onaindia, M., Barraqueta, P. y Madariaga, I. (2015). Provisioning ecosystem services supply and demand: The role of landscape management to reinforce supply and promote synergies with other ecosystem services. Land Use Policy, 47, 145-155.Partelow, S. y Winkler, K. J. (2016). Interlinking ecosystem services and Ostrom’s framework through orientation in sustainability research. Ecology and Society, 21(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08524-210327Pico-Mendoza, J., Pinoargote-Chang, M., Carrasco, B. y Limongi, R. (2020). Ecosystem services in certified and non-certified coffee agroforestry systems in Costa Rica. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 44(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2020.1713962Potschin, M. y Haines-Young, R. (2013). Landscapes, sustainability and the place-based analysis of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology, 28, 1015-1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9756-xRincón-Ruiz, A., Echeverry, M. y Zuluaga, P. (2014). Valoración integral de la biodiversidad y los servicios ecosistémicos: Aspectos conceptuales y metodológicos. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH).Romero-Díaz, A., De Vente, J. y Díaz-Pereira, E. (2019). Assessment of the ecosystem services provided by agricultural terraces. Pirineos, 174, e043.Santos-Martin, F., Viinikka, A., Mononen, L., Brander, L. M., Vihervaara, P., Liekens, I. y Potschin-Young, M. (2018). Creating an operational database for Ecosystems Services Mapping and Assessment Methods. One Ecosystem, 3, e26719. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e26719Silori, C. (2015). Ecosystem services and sustainable development: opportunities and challenges. The Center for People and Forests, Bangkok, Thailand.Silvetti, F. (2011). Una revisión conceptual sobre la relación entre campesinos y servicios ecosistémicos. Cuadernos De Desarrollo Rural, 8(66), 19-45. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cdr8-66.rcsrTian, Q. (2017). Rural Sustainability. A Complex Systems Approach to Policy Analysis. Springer.Vanzetto, G. V. y Thomé, A. (2019). Bibliometric study of the toxicology of nanoescale zero valent iron used in soil remediation. Environmental Pollution, 252(Part A), 74-83.Vihervaara, P., Rönkä, M. y Walls, M. (2010). Trends in ecosystem service research: early steps and current drivers. Ambio, 39, 314-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0048-xVihervaara, P. et al. (2018). Biophysical mapping and assessment methods for ecosystem services. Deliverable D3.3 EU Horizon 2020 ESMERALDA Project, Grant agreement No. 642007.Vihervaara, P., Viinikka, A., Brander, L., Santos-Martín, F., Poikolainen, L. y Nedkov, S. (2019). Methodological interlinkages for mapping ecosystem services – from data to analysis and decision-support. One Ecosystem, 4, e26368. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.4.e26368Vogt, M. y Weber, C. (2019). Current challenges to the concept of sustainability. Global Sustainability, 2(e4), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2019.1Wang, C., Zhang, Y., Yang, Y., Yang, Q., Kush, J., Xu, Y. y Xu, L. (2016). Assessment of sustainable livelihoods of different farmers in hilly red soil erosion areas of southern China. Ecological Indicators, 64, 123-131.Waweru, P., Burkhard, B. y Müller, F. (2016). A review of studies on ecosystem services in África. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 5(2), 225-245.Wegner, G. y Pascual, U. (2011). Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 492-504.Winther, A. M. (2017). Community sustainability: a holistic approach to measuring the sustainability of rural communities in Scotland. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 24(4), 338-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2016.1224987Wolff, S., Schulp, C. J. E. y Verburg, P. H. (2015). Mapping ecosystem services demand: a review of current research and future perspectives. Ecological Indicators, 55, 159-171.Wu, J. (2013). Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecol, 28, 999-1023.You, H. y Zhang, X. (2017). Sustainable livelihoods and rural sustainability in China: ¿Ecologically secure, economically efficient or socially equitable? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 120, 1-13.Núm. 56 , Año 2023 : Enero-Juniohttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/lunazul/article/download/9432/7606https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/lunazul/article/download/9432/7617https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Sandoval Muelas, Diomedes ArnoldoBeltran Vargas, Julio Eduardooai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/236032025-10-08T21:12:51Z

Publicaciones similares