Metodologías para determinar la digestibilidad de los alimentos utilizados en la alimentación canina

RESUMEN: La nutrición es uno de los campos más estudiados en la medicina veterinaria, no solamente en animales de abasto, sino también en animales de compañía; por tal motivo, es de gran importancia conocer la calidad y qué tan digestibles son las materias primas con las cuales se fabrican los alime...

Full description

Autores:

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2022

Institución:: Universidad de Caldas

Repositorio:: Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas

Idioma:: spa

id	REPOUCALDA_83e16867b45752179e0e256c927db826
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/25549
network_acronym_str	REPOUCALDA
network_name_str	Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv	Metodologías para determinar la digestibilidad de los alimentos utilizados en la alimentación canina Methodologies to determinate the digestibility of foods used in feeding dogs
title	Metodologías para determinar la digestibilidad de los alimentos utilizados en la alimentación canina
spellingShingle	Metodologías para determinar la digestibilidad de los alimentos utilizados en la alimentación canina canulación digestión heces perros marcador cannulation digestion faeces canine marker
title_short	Metodologías para determinar la digestibilidad de los alimentos utilizados en la alimentación canina
title_full	Metodologías para determinar la digestibilidad de los alimentos utilizados en la alimentación canina
title_fullStr	Metodologías para determinar la digestibilidad de los alimentos utilizados en la alimentación canina
title_full_unstemmed	Metodologías para determinar la digestibilidad de los alimentos utilizados en la alimentación canina
title_sort	Metodologías para determinar la digestibilidad de los alimentos utilizados en la alimentación canina
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv	canulación digestión heces perros marcador cannulation digestion faeces canine marker
topic	canulación digestión heces perros marcador cannulation digestion faeces canine marker
description	RESUMEN: La nutrición es uno de los campos más estudiados en la medicina veterinaria, no solamente en animales de abasto, sino también en animales de compañía; por tal motivo, es de gran importancia conocer la calidad y qué tan digestibles son las materias primas con las cuales se fabrican los alimentos balanceados, ya que de estas depende en gran medida el rendimiento y el bienestar para los animales. Por definición, la digestibilidad es la fracción de alimento consumido que no aparece en las heces y por lo tanto se absorbe en el tracto gastrointestinal; aunque se diferencian la digestibilidad aparente y la verdadera, la primera no incluye los aportes metabólicos y endógenos provenientes de enzimas, células epiteliales, células microbiales, metabolitos, entre otros, que llegan a la luz intestinal y son excretados&nbsp; en las heces, mientras que en la digestibilidad verdadera estas fracciones de origen metabólico y endógeno se descuentan de la fracción excretada en las heces para la realización de los cálculos. Para determinar el coeficiente de digestibilidad de un nutriente en un alimento existen métodos in vivo directos como la recolección total de heces, indirectos cuando se usan indicadores; métodos in situ como la canulación ileal y finalmente los métodos in vitro en los cuales se usan enzimas y técnicas de fermentación. Los diferentes métodos varían en precisión y mecanismos empleados para determinar los coeficientes de digestibilidad. Por lo tanto, el siguiente artículo tiene como objetivo describir las principales técnicas utilizadas en la determinación de la digestibilidad de los alimentos utilizados en la alimentación canina, y establecer&nbsp; las ventajas y desventajas de cada una de ellas para que los investigadores usen a su criterio la técnica que mejor se adapte a sus necesidades. &nbsp;
publishDate	2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv	2022-03-17T01:09:40Z 2022-03-17T01:09:40Z 2022-03-17 2025-10-08T21:58:11Z 2025-10-08T21:58:11Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bc Text info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal article http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREV info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/25549 2011-5415 https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/vetzootec/article/view/4450
url	https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/25549 https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/vetzootec/article/view/4450
identifier_str_mv	2011-5415
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv	97 1 87 6 Revista Veterinaria y Zootecnia (On Line) Adesogan, A.T.; Owen, E.; Givens, D.I. Prediction of the in vivo digestibility of whole crop wheat from in vitro digestibility, chemical composition, in situ rumen degradability, in vitro gas production and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Animal feed science and technology, v.74, n.3, p.259-272, 1998. Association of American Feed Control Officials – AAFCO. Official Publication. Inc., Atlanta, GA, 1992. Bauer, E.; William, B.A.; Voigt, C. et al. Microbial activities of faeces from unweaned and adult pigs, in relation to selected fermentable carbohydrates. Animal science, v.73, p.313- 322, 2001. Boisen, S.; Eggum, B.O. Critical evaluation of in vitro methods for estimating digestibility in simplestomach animals. Nutrition research reviews, v.4, n.1, p.141-162, 1991. Boisen, S.; Fernández, J. Prediction of the apparent ileal digestibility of protein and amino acid in feedstuffs and feed mixtures for pigs by in vitro analyses. Animal feed science and technology, v.51, n.1, p.29-43, 1995. Bremer, H.; Fessel, C.A.; Pezzato, L.E. et al. Determinação de rotina do crômio em fezes, como marcador biológico, pelo método espectrofotométrico ajustado da 1,5-difenilcarbazida. Ciência rural, v.35, n.3, p.691-697, 2005. Buñay, A.J.K. Validación del método cenizas ácido insolubles para determinar digestibilidad en el alimento balanceado frente al método de recolección total. Riobamba, Ecuador: Escuela superior politécnica del Chimborazo, Facultad de Ciencias, Escuela de Bioquímica y Farmacia, 2010. 139p. Tesis (Bioquímico Farmacéutico). Burrows, C.F.; Kronfeld, D.S.; Banta, C.A. et al. Effects of fiber on digestibility and transit time in dogs. The journal of nutrition, v.112, n.9, p.1726-1732, 1982. Calabró, S.; Carone, F.; Cutrignelli, M.I. et al. The effect of haymaking on the neutral detergent soluble fraction of two intercropped forages cut at different growth stages. Italian journal of animal sciences, v.5, n.4, p.327-339, 2006. Carciofi, A.C.; de-Oliveira, L.D.; Valério, A.G. et al. Comparison of micronized whole soybeans to common protein sources in dry dog and cat diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology, v.151, n.3, p.251-260, 2009. Carciofi, A.C.; Vasconcellos, R.S.; de-Oliveira, L.D. et al. Chromic oxide as a digestibility marker for dogs - A comparison of methods of analysis. Animal Feed Science and Technology, v.134, n.3, p.273-282, 2007. Castrillo, C.; Hervera, M.; Baucells, M.D. Methods for predicting the energy value of pet foods. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v.38, supl., p.1-14, 2009. Cavalari, A.P; Lopes, D.J.; Viana, J.A. et al. Determinação do valor nutritivo de alimentos energéticos e proteicos utilizados em rações para cães adultos. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v.35, n.5, p.1985-1991, 2006. Coles, L.T.; Moughan, P.J.; Awati, A. et al. Influence of assay conditions on the in vitro hindgut digestibility of dry matter. Food chemistry, v.125, n.4, p.1351-1358, 2011. Correa, G.V.; de-Oliveira, F.M.; Charleaux, N. et al. Zeólitas e Yucca schidigera em rações para cães: palatabilidade, digestibilidade e redução de odores fecais. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, n.39, n.11, p.2442-2446, 2010. De Brito, C.B.M.; Felix, A.P.; de Jesus, R.M. et al. Digestibility and palatability of dog foods containing different moisture levels, and the inclusion of a mould inhibitor. Animal feed science and technology, v.159, n.3, p.150-155, 2010. Diez, M.; Hornick, J.L.; Baldwin, P. et al. The influence of sugar-beet fiber, guar gum and inulin on nutrient digestibility, water consumption and plasma metabolites in healthy Beagle dogs. Research in veterinary science, v.64, n.2, p.91-96, 1998. Dikeman, C.L.; Barry, K.A.; Murphy, R.M. et al. Diet and measurement techniques affect small intestinal digesta viscosity among dogs. Nutrition research, v.27, n.1, p.56-65, 2007. Dobenecker, B.; Frank, V.; Kienzle, E. High calcium intake differentially inhibits nutrient and energy digestibility in two different breeds of growing dogs. Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, v.94, n.5, p.109-114, 2010. Eklund, M.; Caine, W.R.; Sauer, W.C. et al. True and standardized ileal digestibilities and specific ileal Indogenous recoveries of crude protein and amino acid in soybean meal, rapeseed meal and peas fed to growing pigs. Livestock science, v.145, n.1, p.174-182, 2012. Faber, T.A.; Bechtel, P.J.; Hernot, D.C. et al. Protein digestibility evaluations of meat and fish substrates using laboratory, avian, and ileally cannulated dog assays. Journal of animal science, v.88, n.4, p.1421-1432, 2010. Fahey, G.Jr.; Jung, H. Lignin as a marker in digestion studies: a review. Journal of animal science, v.57, n.1, p.220-225, 1983. Fortes, C.M.L.S; Carciofi, A.C.; Sakomura, N.K. et al. Digestibility and metabolizable energy of some carbohydrate sources for dogs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, v.156, n.3, p.121-125, 2010. Gröner, T.; Pfeffer; E. Digestibility of organic matter and digestible energy in single ingredients of extruded dog feeds and their effects on faecal dry matter concentration and consistency. Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, v.77, n.1.5, p.214-220, 1977. Guevara, M.A.; Bauer, L.L.; Abbas, C.A. et al. Chemical Composition, in Vitro Fermentation Characteristics, and in Vivo Digestibility Responses by Dogs to Select Corn Fibers. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, v.56, n.5, p.1619-1626, 2008. Gutiérrez, K.L. Potencial de la planta acuática Lemna gibba en la alimentación de cerdos. Tecomán, México: Universidad de Colima, 2000. 70p. Tesis (Maestría en Ciencias Pecuarias). Ham, R.; Vermaut, S.; Flo, G. et al. Digestive performance of dogs fed a jojoba meal supplemented diet. Industrial crops and products, v.12, p.159-163, 2000. Harmon, D. Experimental approaches to study the nutritional value of foods ingredients for dogs and cats. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v.36, Suplemento especial, p.251-262, 2007. Hervera, M.; Baucells, M.D.; Blanch, F. et al. Prediction of digestible energy content of extruded dog food by in vitro analyses. Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, v.91, n.5-6, p.205-209, 2007. Hilcko, K.P.; Felix, A.P.; de-Oliveira, S.G. et al. Diferentes graus de moagem em dietas para cães. Ciência Rural, v.39, n.8, p.2511-2515, 2009. Hill, R.C.; Burrows, C.F.; Ellison, G.W. et al. The use of chromic oxide as a marker for measuring small intestinal digestibility in cannulated dogs. Journal of animal science, v.74, n.7, p.1629-1634, 1996. Htoo, J.K.; Araiza, B.A.; Sauer, W.C. et al. Effect of dietary protein content on ileal amino acid digestibility, growth performance, and formation of microbial metabolites in ileal and cecal digesta of early-weaned pigs. Journal of animal science, v.85, p.3303–3312, 2007. Jagger, S.; Wiseman, J.; Cole, D.J.A. et al. Evaluation of inert markers for the determination of ileal and faecal apparent digestibility values in the pig. British journal of nutrition, v.68, n.3, p.729-739, 1992. Julliand, V.; De Fombelle, A.; Varloud, M. Starch digestion in horses: The impact of feed processing. Livestock science, v.100, n.1, p.44-52, 2006. Kavanagh, S.; Lynch, P.B.; O’mara, F. et al. A comparison of total collection and marker technique for the measurement of apparent digestibility of diets for growing pigs. Animal feed science and technology, v.89, n.1, p.49- 58, 2001. Kienzle, E.; Schrag, I.; Butterwick, R. et al. Calculation of gross energy in pet foods: new data on heat combustion and fibre analysis in a selection of foods for dogs and cats. Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, v.85, n.5-6, p.148-157, 2001. Krogdahl, A.; Ahlstrom, O.; Skrede, A. Nutrient Digestibility of Commercial Dog Foods Using Mink as a Model. The journal of nutrition, v.134, n.8, p.2141-2144, 2004. Lankhorst, C.; Tran, Q.D.; Havenaar, R. et al. The effect of extrusion on the nutritional value of canine diets as assessed by in vitro indicators. Animal feed science and technology, v.138, n.3-4, p.285-297, 2007. Maynard, L. Nutrición Animal. 7.ed. México: McGraw-Hill, 1986. p. Middelbos, I.S.; Fastinger, N.D.; Fahey G.C. Evaluation of fermentable oligosaccharides in diets fed to dogs in comparison to fiber standards. Journal of animal science, v.85, n.11, p.3033-3044, 2007. Mosenthin, R.; Jansman, A.J.M.; Eklund, M. Standardization of methods for the determination of ileal amino acid digestibilities in growing pigs. Livestock science, v.109, p.276-281, 2007. Murray, S.M.; Patil, R.M.; Fahey, G.C. et al. Apparent digestibility and glycaemic responses to an experimental induced viscosity dietary fibre incorporated into an enteral formula fed to dogs cannulated in the ileum. Food and chemical toxicology, v.37, n.1, p.47-56, 1999. National Research Council - NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Dogs and Cats. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2006. 424p. Nery, J.; Biourge, V.; Tournier, C. et al. Influence of dietary protein content and source on fecal quality, electrolyte concentrations, and osmolarity, and digestibility in dogs differing in body size. Journal of animal science, v.88, n.1, p.159-169, 2010. Nieves, D.; Barajas, A.; Delgado, G. et al. Digestibilidad fecal de nutrientes en dietas con forrajes tropicales en conejos: Comparación entre métodos directo e indirecto. Bioagro, v.20, n.1, p.73-75, 2008. Rodríguez, N.; Simões, E.O.; Guimarães-Junior, R. et al. Uso de indicadores para estimar consumo y digestibilidad de pasto. Lipe, lignina purificada y enriquecida. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias, v.20, n.4, 2007. Secombe, C.J.; Lester, G.D. The role of diet in the prevention and management of several equine diseases. Animal feed science and technology, v.173, n.1-2, p.86-101, 2012. Silvio, J.; Harmon, D.L.; Gross, K.L. et al. Influence of fiber fermentability on nutrient digestion in the dog. Basic nutritional investigation, v.16, n.4, p.289-295, 2000. Stein, H.H.; Fuller, M.F.; Moughan, P.J. et al. Definition of apparent, true, and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in pigs. Livestock science, v.109, p.282-285, 2007. Strickling, J.A.; Harmon, D.L.; Dawson, K.A. et al. Evaluation of oligosaccharide addition to dog diets: influences on nutrient digestion and microbial populations. Animal feed science and technology, v.86, n.3, p.205-219, 2000. Tavares, G.C.M.B.; Araújo, A.H.B.; Colnago, G.L. et al. Composição química e digestibilidade de partes e subprodutos de aves nas formas crua e cozida para cães. Arquivo Brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia, v.62, n.2, p.453-459, 2010. Twomey, L.N.; Pluske, J.R.; Rowe, J.B. et al. The effects of added fructooligosaccharide (raftilosa®P95) and inulinase in the faecal quality and digestibility in dogs. Animal feed science and technology, v.108, n.1-4, p.83-93, 2003. Walker, J.A.; Harmon, D.L.; Gross, K.L. et al. Evaluation of nutrient utilization in the canine using the ileal canulation technique. The journal of nutrition, v.124, p.2672S-2676S, 1994. Weber, M.; Bissot, T.; Servet, E. et al. High-protein, High-fiber diet designed for weight loss improves satiety in dogs. Journal of veterinary internal medicine, v.21, n.6, p.1203-1208, 2007. Zanatta, C.P.; Félix, A.P.; Brito, C.B.M. et al. Digestibility of dry extruded food in adults dogs and puppies. Arquivo Brasileiro de medicina veterinaria y zootecnia, v.63, n.3, p.784-787, 2011. Zentek, J.; Fricke, S.; Hewicker-Trautwein, M. et al. Dietary Protein Source and Manufacturing Processes Affect Macronutrient Digestibility, Fecal Consistency, and Presence of Fecal Clostridium perfringens in Adult Dogs. The journal of nutrition, v.134, n.8, p.2158-2161, 2004. Núm. 1 , Año 2012 : Enero - Junio https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/vetzootec/article/download/4450/4082
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Caldas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Caldas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/vetzootec/article/view/4450
institution	Universidad de Caldas
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_	1866404528892411904
spelling	Metodologías para determinar la digestibilidad de los alimentos utilizados en la alimentación caninaMethodologies to determinate the digestibility of foods used in feeding dogscanulacióndigestiónhecesperrosmarcadorcannulationdigestionfaecescaninemarkerRESUMEN: La nutrición es uno de los campos más estudiados en la medicina veterinaria, no solamente en animales de abasto, sino también en animales de compañía; por tal motivo, es de gran importancia conocer la calidad y qué tan digestibles son las materias primas con las cuales se fabrican los alimentos balanceados, ya que de estas depende en gran medida el rendimiento y el bienestar para los animales. Por definición, la digestibilidad es la fracción de alimento consumido que no aparece en las heces y por lo tanto se absorbe en el tracto gastrointestinal; aunque se diferencian la digestibilidad aparente y la verdadera, la primera no incluye los aportes metabólicos y endógenos provenientes de enzimas, células epiteliales, células microbiales, metabolitos, entre otros, que llegan a la luz intestinal y son excretados&nbsp; en las heces, mientras que en la digestibilidad verdadera estas fracciones de origen metabólico y endógeno se descuentan de la fracción excretada en las heces para la realización de los cálculos. Para determinar el coeficiente de digestibilidad de un nutriente en un alimento existen métodos in vivo directos como la recolección total de heces, indirectos cuando se usan indicadores; métodos in situ como la canulación ileal y finalmente los métodos in vitro en los cuales se usan enzimas y técnicas de fermentación. Los diferentes métodos varían en precisión y mecanismos empleados para determinar los coeficientes de digestibilidad. Por lo tanto, el siguiente artículo tiene como objetivo describir las principales técnicas utilizadas en la determinación de la digestibilidad de los alimentos utilizados en la alimentación canina, y establecer&nbsp; las ventajas y desventajas de cada una de ellas para que los investigadores usen a su criterio la técnica que mejor se adapte a sus necesidades. &nbsp;ABSTRACT: Nutrition is one of the most documented fields in Veterinary Medicine, no just in food animals but also in small animal medicine, for this reason is the great importance to know the quality and digestibility of raws which are manufactured the balanced food, because animal welfare and performance are related to this. By&nbsp; definition, digestibility is the consumed food that is not present in feces, by the way is absorbed in gastrointestinal tract; although differing, apparent digestibility and true digestibility, the first one does not included the metabolic contribution and endogenous originated of the enzymatic activity, epithelial cells, microbial cells, metabolites among others, reaching the intestinal lumen and are excreted in feces, whereas in the true digestibility these fractions of metabolic and endogenous origin are discounted of the excreted fraction to make the calculations. To determine the apparent digestibility coefficient of a nutrient in a food there are in vivo methods directs such as the total feces recollection, indirect when indicators are used, in situ methods like ileal cannulation and finally in vitro methods in which enzymes are used and fermentation techniques. The different method varies in precision and employed mechanisms to determinate the digestibility coefficients. Therefore, the objective of this article is to describe the main techniques used in the digestibility determination of raws employed in dog foods and to establish the advantages and disadvantages of each one to the researches use that according to their needs.Universidad de Caldas2022-03-17T01:09:40Z2025-10-08T21:58:11Z2022-03-17T01:09:40Z2025-10-08T21:58:11Z2022-03-17Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcTextinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREVinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1application/pdfhttps://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/255492011-5415https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/vetzootec/article/view/4450https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/vetzootec/article/view/4450spa971876Revista Veterinaria y Zootecnia (On Line)Adesogan, A.T.; Owen, E.; Givens, D.I. Prediction of the in vivo digestibility of whole crop wheat from in vitro digestibility, chemical composition, in situ rumen degradability, in vitro gas production and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Animal feed science and technology, v.74, n.3, p.259-272, 1998.Association of American Feed Control Officials – AAFCO. Official Publication. Inc., Atlanta, GA, 1992.Bauer, E.; William, B.A.; Voigt, C. et al. Microbial activities of faeces from unweaned and adult pigs, in relation to selected fermentable carbohydrates. Animal science, v.73, p.313- 322, 2001.Boisen, S.; Eggum, B.O. Critical evaluation of in vitro methods for estimating digestibility in simplestomach animals. Nutrition research reviews, v.4, n.1, p.141-162, 1991.Boisen, S.; Fernández, J. Prediction of the apparent ileal digestibility of protein and amino acid in feedstuffs and feed mixtures for pigs by in vitro analyses. Animal feed science and technology, v.51, n.1, p.29-43, 1995.Bremer, H.; Fessel, C.A.; Pezzato, L.E. et al. Determinação de rotina do crômio em fezes, como marcador biológico, pelo método espectrofotométrico ajustado da 1,5-difenilcarbazida. Ciência rural, v.35, n.3, p.691-697, 2005.Buñay, A.J.K. Validación del método cenizas ácido insolubles para determinar digestibilidad en el alimento balanceado frente al método de recolección total. Riobamba, Ecuador: Escuela superior politécnica del Chimborazo, Facultad de Ciencias, Escuela de Bioquímica y Farmacia, 2010. 139p. Tesis (Bioquímico Farmacéutico).Burrows, C.F.; Kronfeld, D.S.; Banta, C.A. et al. Effects of fiber on digestibility and transit time in dogs. The journal of nutrition, v.112, n.9, p.1726-1732, 1982.Calabró, S.; Carone, F.; Cutrignelli, M.I. et al. The effect of haymaking on the neutral detergent soluble fraction of two intercropped forages cut at different growth stages. Italian journal of animal sciences, v.5, n.4, p.327-339, 2006.Carciofi, A.C.; de-Oliveira, L.D.; Valério, A.G. et al. Comparison of micronized whole soybeans to common protein sources in dry dog and cat diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology, v.151, n.3, p.251-260, 2009.Carciofi, A.C.; Vasconcellos, R.S.; de-Oliveira, L.D. et al. Chromic oxide as a digestibility marker for dogs - A comparison of methods of analysis. Animal Feed Science and Technology, v.134, n.3, p.273-282, 2007.Castrillo, C.; Hervera, M.; Baucells, M.D. Methods for predicting the energy value of pet foods. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v.38, supl., p.1-14, 2009.Cavalari, A.P; Lopes, D.J.; Viana, J.A. et al. Determinação do valor nutritivo de alimentos energéticos e proteicos utilizados em rações para cães adultos. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v.35, n.5, p.1985-1991, 2006.Coles, L.T.; Moughan, P.J.; Awati, A. et al. Influence of assay conditions on the in vitro hindgut digestibility of dry matter. Food chemistry, v.125, n.4, p.1351-1358, 2011.Correa, G.V.; de-Oliveira, F.M.; Charleaux, N. et al. Zeólitas e Yucca schidigera em rações para cães: palatabilidade, digestibilidade e redução de odores fecais. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, n.39, n.11, p.2442-2446, 2010.De Brito, C.B.M.; Felix, A.P.; de Jesus, R.M. et al. Digestibility and palatability of dog foods containing different moisture levels, and the inclusion of a mould inhibitor. Animal feed science and technology, v.159, n.3, p.150-155, 2010.Diez, M.; Hornick, J.L.; Baldwin, P. et al. The influence of sugar-beet fiber, guar gum and inulin on nutrient digestibility, water consumption and plasma metabolites in healthy Beagle dogs. Research in veterinary science, v.64, n.2, p.91-96, 1998.Dikeman, C.L.; Barry, K.A.; Murphy, R.M. et al. Diet and measurement techniques affect small intestinal digesta viscosity among dogs. Nutrition research, v.27, n.1, p.56-65, 2007.Dobenecker, B.; Frank, V.; Kienzle, E. High calcium intake differentially inhibits nutrient and energy digestibility in two different breeds of growing dogs. Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, v.94, n.5, p.109-114, 2010.Eklund, M.; Caine, W.R.; Sauer, W.C. et al. True and standardized ileal digestibilities and specific ileal Indogenous recoveries of crude protein and amino acid in soybean meal, rapeseed meal and peas fed to growing pigs. Livestock science, v.145, n.1, p.174-182, 2012.Faber, T.A.; Bechtel, P.J.; Hernot, D.C. et al. Protein digestibility evaluations of meat and fish substrates using laboratory, avian, and ileally cannulated dog assays. Journal of animal science, v.88, n.4, p.1421-1432, 2010.Fahey, G.Jr.; Jung, H. Lignin as a marker in digestion studies: a review. Journal of animal science, v.57, n.1, p.220-225, 1983.Fortes, C.M.L.S; Carciofi, A.C.; Sakomura, N.K. et al. Digestibility and metabolizable energy of some carbohydrate sources for dogs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, v.156, n.3, p.121-125, 2010.Gröner, T.; Pfeffer; E. Digestibility of organic matter and digestible energy in single ingredients of extruded dog feeds and their effects on faecal dry matter concentration and consistency. Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, v.77, n.1.5, p.214-220, 1977.Guevara, M.A.; Bauer, L.L.; Abbas, C.A. et al. Chemical Composition, in Vitro Fermentation Characteristics, and in Vivo Digestibility Responses by Dogs to Select Corn Fibers. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, v.56, n.5, p.1619-1626, 2008.Gutiérrez, K.L. Potencial de la planta acuática Lemna gibba en la alimentación de cerdos. Tecomán, México: Universidad de Colima, 2000. 70p. Tesis (Maestría en Ciencias Pecuarias).Ham, R.; Vermaut, S.; Flo, G. et al. Digestive performance of dogs fed a jojoba meal supplemented diet. Industrial crops and products, v.12, p.159-163, 2000.Harmon, D. Experimental approaches to study the nutritional value of foods ingredients for dogs and cats. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v.36, Suplemento especial, p.251-262, 2007.Hervera, M.; Baucells, M.D.; Blanch, F. et al. Prediction of digestible energy content of extruded dog food by in vitro analyses. Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, v.91, n.5-6, p.205-209, 2007.Hilcko, K.P.; Felix, A.P.; de-Oliveira, S.G. et al. Diferentes graus de moagem em dietas para cães. Ciência Rural, v.39, n.8, p.2511-2515, 2009.Hill, R.C.; Burrows, C.F.; Ellison, G.W. et al. The use of chromic oxide as a marker for measuring small intestinal digestibility in cannulated dogs. Journal of animal science, v.74, n.7, p.1629-1634, 1996.Htoo, J.K.; Araiza, B.A.; Sauer, W.C. et al. Effect of dietary protein content on ileal amino acid digestibility, growth performance, and formation of microbial metabolites in ileal and cecal digesta of early-weaned pigs. Journal of animal science, v.85, p.3303–3312, 2007.Jagger, S.; Wiseman, J.; Cole, D.J.A. et al. Evaluation of inert markers for the determination of ileal and faecal apparent digestibility values in the pig. British journal of nutrition, v.68, n.3, p.729-739, 1992.Julliand, V.; De Fombelle, A.; Varloud, M. Starch digestion in horses: The impact of feed processing. Livestock science, v.100, n.1, p.44-52, 2006.Kavanagh, S.; Lynch, P.B.; O’mara, F. et al. A comparison of total collection and marker technique for the measurement of apparent digestibility of diets for growing pigs. Animal feed science and technology, v.89, n.1, p.49- 58, 2001.Kienzle, E.; Schrag, I.; Butterwick, R. et al. Calculation of gross energy in pet foods: new data on heat combustion and fibre analysis in a selection of foods for dogs and cats. Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition, v.85, n.5-6, p.148-157, 2001.Krogdahl, A.; Ahlstrom, O.; Skrede, A. Nutrient Digestibility of Commercial Dog Foods Using Mink as a Model. The journal of nutrition, v.134, n.8, p.2141-2144, 2004.Lankhorst, C.; Tran, Q.D.; Havenaar, R. et al. The effect of extrusion on the nutritional value of canine diets as assessed by in vitro indicators. Animal feed science and technology, v.138, n.3-4, p.285-297, 2007.Maynard, L. Nutrición Animal. 7.ed. México: McGraw-Hill, 1986. p.Middelbos, I.S.; Fastinger, N.D.; Fahey G.C. Evaluation of fermentable oligosaccharides in diets fed to dogs in comparison to fiber standards. Journal of animal science, v.85, n.11, p.3033-3044, 2007.Mosenthin, R.; Jansman, A.J.M.; Eklund, M. Standardization of methods for the determination of ileal amino acid digestibilities in growing pigs. Livestock science, v.109, p.276-281, 2007.Murray, S.M.; Patil, R.M.; Fahey, G.C. et al. Apparent digestibility and glycaemic responses to an experimental induced viscosity dietary fibre incorporated into an enteral formula fed to dogs cannulated in the ileum. Food and chemical toxicology, v.37, n.1, p.47-56, 1999.National Research Council - NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Dogs and Cats. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2006. 424p.Nery, J.; Biourge, V.; Tournier, C. et al. Influence of dietary protein content and source on fecal quality, electrolyte concentrations, and osmolarity, and digestibility in dogs differing in body size. Journal of animal science, v.88, n.1, p.159-169, 2010.Nieves, D.; Barajas, A.; Delgado, G. et al. Digestibilidad fecal de nutrientes en dietas con forrajes tropicales en conejos: Comparación entre métodos directo e indirecto. Bioagro, v.20, n.1, p.73-75, 2008.Rodríguez, N.; Simões, E.O.; Guimarães-Junior, R. et al. Uso de indicadores para estimar consumo y digestibilidad de pasto. Lipe, lignina purificada y enriquecida. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias, v.20, n.4, 2007.Secombe, C.J.; Lester, G.D. The role of diet in the prevention and management of several equine diseases. Animal feed science and technology, v.173, n.1-2, p.86-101, 2012.Silvio, J.; Harmon, D.L.; Gross, K.L. et al. Influence of fiber fermentability on nutrient digestion in the dog. Basic nutritional investigation, v.16, n.4, p.289-295, 2000.Stein, H.H.; Fuller, M.F.; Moughan, P.J. et al. Definition of apparent, true, and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in pigs. Livestock science, v.109, p.282-285, 2007.Strickling, J.A.; Harmon, D.L.; Dawson, K.A. et al. Evaluation of oligosaccharide addition to dog diets: influences on nutrient digestion and microbial populations. Animal feed science and technology, v.86, n.3, p.205-219, 2000.Tavares, G.C.M.B.; Araújo, A.H.B.; Colnago, G.L. et al. Composição química e digestibilidade de partes e subprodutos de aves nas formas crua e cozida para cães. Arquivo Brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia, v.62, n.2, p.453-459, 2010.Twomey, L.N.; Pluske, J.R.; Rowe, J.B. et al. The effects of added fructooligosaccharide (raftilosa®P95) and inulinase in the faecal quality and digestibility in dogs. Animal feed science and technology, v.108, n.1-4, p.83-93, 2003.Walker, J.A.; Harmon, D.L.; Gross, K.L. et al. Evaluation of nutrient utilization in the canine using the ileal canulation technique. The journal of nutrition, v.124, p.2672S-2676S, 1994.Weber, M.; Bissot, T.; Servet, E. et al. High-protein, High-fiber diet designed for weight loss improves satiety in dogs. Journal of veterinary internal medicine, v.21, n.6, p.1203-1208, 2007.Zanatta, C.P.; Félix, A.P.; Brito, C.B.M. et al. Digestibility of dry extruded food in adults dogs and puppies. Arquivo Brasileiro de medicina veterinaria y zootecnia, v.63, n.3, p.784-787, 2011.Zentek, J.; Fricke, S.; Hewicker-Trautwein, M. et al. Dietary Protein Source and Manufacturing Processes Affect Macronutrient Digestibility, Fecal Consistency, and Presence of Fecal Clostridium perfringens in Adult Dogs. The journal of nutrition, v.134, n.8, p.2158-2161, 2004.Núm. 1 , Año 2012 : Enero - Juniohttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/vetzootec/article/download/4450/4082https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Osorio Carmona, EstebanGiraldo Carmona, JohnNarváez Solarte, Williamoai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/255492025-10-08T21:58:11Z

Metodologías para determinar la digestibilidad de los alimentos utilizados en la alimentación canina

Publicaciones similares