La concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíos

Los partidarios de la noción sustantiva de Estado de derecho señalan que el mismo es compatible y se construye a partir de las exigencias propias del denominado Estado formal de derecho. Este último exige que el derecho cumpla con ciertas exigencias que aseguren que el contenido del mismo sea capaz...

Full description

Autores:

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2016

Institución:: Universidad de Caldas

Repositorio:: Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas

Idioma:: spa

id	REPOUCALDA_6aa6169667ad5aebda64582e765965c3
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/15899
network_acronym_str	REPOUCALDA
network_name_str	Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv	La concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíos The substantive conception of the Rule of Law: problems and challenges
title	La concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíos
spellingShingle	La concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíos rule of law predictability of the law bill of rights judicial discretion judicial review Estado de derecho predictibilidad del derecho declaraciones de derechos discrecionalidad judicial revisión judicial
title_short	La concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíos
title_full	La concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíos
title_fullStr	La concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíos
title_full_unstemmed	La concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíos
title_sort	La concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíos
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv	rule of law predictability of the law bill of rights judicial discretion judicial review Estado de derecho predictibilidad del derecho declaraciones de derechos discrecionalidad judicial revisión judicial
topic	rule of law predictability of the law bill of rights judicial discretion judicial review Estado de derecho predictibilidad del derecho declaraciones de derechos discrecionalidad judicial revisión judicial
description	Los partidarios de la noción sustantiva de Estado de derecho señalan que el mismo es compatible y se construye a partir de las exigencias propias del denominado Estado formal de derecho. Este último exige que el derecho cumpla con ciertas exigencias que aseguren que el contenido del mismo sea capaz de: (i) limitar de forma significativa la autoridad estatal y (ii) orientar los procesos de toma de decisión de los ciudadanos. Sin embargo elementos propios de la noción de Estado de derecho sustantivo, como el reconocimiento de declaraciones de derechos judicialmente aplicables de forma directa, generan fuertes tensiones con las exigencias de la galidad. Esto especialmente en al área de la discrecionalidad judicial. Frente a esto, el autor concluye que los partidarios de la noción de Estado de derecho sustantivo deben: (i) repensar el concepto buscando aliviar dichas tensiones o (ii) simplemente construir la noción sobre bases conceptuales diversas.
publishDate	2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv	2016-07-01 00:00:00 2016-07-01 00:00:00 2016-07-01 2021-02-07T10:10:38Z 2021-02-07T10:10:38Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista Sección Artículos Journal Article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Text info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv	1794-2918 https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2016.13.2.2 https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/15899 10.17151/jurid.2016.13.2.2 2590-8928
identifier_str_mv	1794-2918 10.17151/jurid.2016.13.2.2 2590-8928
url	https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2016.13.2.2 https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/15899
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv	26 2 9 13 Jurídicas Allan, T.R.S. (2001). Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of The Rule of Law. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Allan, T.R.S. (2013). The Sovereignty of Law. Freedom, Constitution and Common Law. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Allan, J. (2000). Oh that I were made judge in the land. Federal Law Review, 30 (3), 561-576. Allan, J. (2011). Reasonable Disagreement and the Diminution of Democracy: Joseph’s Morally Laden Understanding of the rule of law. En Ekins, R. (Ed.). Modern challenges to the rule of law. Wellington, New Zealand: Lexis Nexis. Beatty, D.M. (2007). The ultimate rule of law. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Bingham, T. (2011). The rule of law. London, England: Penguin Books. Craig, P. (1997). Formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law: An analytical framework. Public Law, 467, 1-15. Charlow, R. (2014). American constitutional analysis and a substantive understanding of the rule of law. En Silkenat, J.R., Hickey, J.E. and Barenboim, P.D. (Ed.). The legal doctrines of the rule of law and the legal state (Rechtsstaat). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. Dicey, A.V. (1982). Introduction to the study of the law and the constitution. Indiana, USA: Liberty Fund. Dworkin, R. (1985). Political judges and the rule of law. A matter of principle. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press. Finnis, J. (2011). Natural law and natural rights. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. George, R. (2001). Reason, freedom, and the rule of law: Their significance in the natural law tradition. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 46, 249-314. Goldsworhty, J. (2001). Legislative sovereignty and the rule of law. En Campbell, T., Ewing, K. and Tomkins, A. (Ed.). Sceptical essays on human rights. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Heydon, J.D. (2014). Are bills of rights necessary in common law systems? Law Quarterly Review, 130, 2-53. Jestaedt, M. (2012). The doctrine of balancing–Its strengths and weaknesses. En Klatt, M. (Ed.). Institutionalized reason: The jurisprudence of Robert Alexy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Joseph, P.A. (2011). The rule of law: foundational norm. En: Ekins, R. (Ed.). Modern challenges to the rule of law. Wellington, New Zealand: Lexis Nexis. Jowell, J. (2015). The rule of law: A practical and universal concept. En Jowell, J., Thomas, C. and van Zyl Smit, J. (Ed.). Rule of law symposium 2014. The importance of the rule of law in promoting development. Singapore, Singapore: Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law y Singapore Academy of Law. Moens, G. (1994). The wrongs of a constitutional entrenched bill of rights. En Stephenson, M.A and Turner, C. (Ed.). Australia: Republic or monarchy? Legal and constitutional issues. Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland. Raz, J. (2012). The rule of law and its virtue. The authority of law. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Shklar, J.N. (1987). Political theory and the rule of law. En Hutchenson, A.C. and Monahan, P. (Ed.). The rule of law: Ideal or ideology? Toronto, Canada: Carswell. Summers, R.S. (1998). The principles of the rule of law. Notre Dame Law Review, 74, 1691-1792. Sunstein, C.R. (1996). Legal reasoning and political conflict. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press. Tamanaha, B. (2004). On the rule of law. History, politics, theory. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press. Urbina, F.J. (2012). A critique of proportionality. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 57 (1), 49-80. Waldron, J. (1999). Law and disagreement. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Waldron, J. (2011). The rule of law and the importance of procedure. En Fleming, J.E. (Ed.). Getting to the rule of law. New York: New York University Press. Webber, G. (2009). The negotiable constitution. On the limits of rights. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press. Webber, G. (2013). Rights and the rule of law in the balance. Law Quarterly Review, 129, 399-419. Yowell, P. (2012). Legislación, Common law y la virtud de la claridad. Revista Chilena de Derecho, 39 (2), 481-512. Zimmermann, A. (2007). The rule of law as a culture of legality: Legal and extra-legal elements for the realization of the rule of law in society. Murdoch University Law Review, 14, 10-31. Núm. 2 , Año 2016 : Julio - Diciembre https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/download/3328/3090
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv	Derechos de autor 2016 Jurídicas https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	Derechos de autor 2016 Jurídicas https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Caldas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Caldas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/view/3328
institution	Universidad de Caldas
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_	1836145048031330304
spelling	La concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíosThe substantive conception of the Rule of Law: problems and challengesrule of lawpredictability of the lawbill of rightsjudicial discretionjudicial reviewEstado de derechopredictibilidad del derechodeclaraciones de derechosdiscrecionalidad judicialrevisión judicialLos partidarios de la noción sustantiva de Estado de derecho señalan que el mismo es compatible y se construye a partir de las exigencias propias del denominado Estado formal de derecho. Este último exige que el derecho cumpla con ciertas exigencias que aseguren que el contenido del mismo sea capaz de: (i) limitar de forma significativa la autoridad estatal y (ii) orientar los procesos de toma de decisión de los ciudadanos. Sin embargo elementos propios de la noción de Estado de derecho sustantivo, como el reconocimiento de declaraciones de derechos judicialmente aplicables de forma directa, generan fuertes tensiones con las exigencias de la galidad. Esto especialmente en al área de la discrecionalidad judicial. Frente a esto, el autor concluye que los partidarios de la noción de Estado de derecho sustantivo deben: (i) repensar el concepto buscando aliviar dichas tensiones o (ii) simplemente construir la noción sobre bases conceptuales diversas.Supporters of the substantive rule of law state that the concept is compatible with the demands of the formal notion of the rule of law. Indeed, they affirm that those demands represent the basis upon which the substantive concept is built. Basically, those formalities demand that the law must be able to: (a) effectively limit the discretion of public authorities and (b) guide the decision-making processes of citizens. However, elements of the substantive notion of the rule of law, such as the existence of bills of rights directly enforceable by courts, create tensions with the imperatives of legality. This is particularly true concerning judicial discretion. In this context, the author concludes that those who support the substantive notion of the rule of law must either: (a) rethink the concept seeking mechanisms to alleviate the identified tensions within the concept, or (b) build the notion upon different grounds.Universidad de Caldas2016-07-01 00:00:002021-02-07T10:10:38Z2016-07-01 00:00:002021-02-07T10:10:38Z2016-07-01Artículo de revistaSección ArtículosJournal Articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1application/pdf1794-2918https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2016.13.2.2https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/1589910.17151/jurid.2016.13.2.22590-8928https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/view/3328spa262913JurídicasAllan, T.R.S. (2001). Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of The Rule of Law. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Allan, T.R.S. (2013). The Sovereignty of Law. Freedom, Constitution and Common Law. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Allan, J. (2000). Oh that I were made judge in the land. Federal Law Review, 30 (3), 561-576.Allan, J. (2011). Reasonable Disagreement and the Diminution of Democracy: Joseph’s Morally Laden Understanding of the rule of law. En Ekins, R. (Ed.). Modern challenges to the rule of law. Wellington, New Zealand: Lexis Nexis.Beatty, D.M. (2007). The ultimate rule of law. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Bingham, T. (2011). The rule of law. London, England: Penguin Books.Craig, P. (1997). Formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law: An analytical framework. Public Law, 467, 1-15.Charlow, R. (2014). American constitutional analysis and a substantive understanding of the rule of law. En Silkenat, J.R., Hickey, J.E. and Barenboim, P.D. (Ed.). The legal doctrines of the rule of law and the legal state (Rechtsstaat). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.Dicey, A.V. (1982). Introduction to the study of the law and the constitution. Indiana, USA: Liberty Fund.Dworkin, R. (1985). Political judges and the rule of law. A matter of principle. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press.Finnis, J. (2011). Natural law and natural rights. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.George, R. (2001). Reason, freedom, and the rule of law: Their significance in the natural law tradition. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 46, 249-314.Goldsworhty, J. (2001). Legislative sovereignty and the rule of law. En Campbell, T., Ewing, K. and Tomkins, A. (Ed.). Sceptical essays on human rights. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Heydon, J.D. (2014). Are bills of rights necessary in common law systems? Law Quarterly Review, 130, 2-53.Jestaedt, M. (2012). The doctrine of balancing–Its strengths and weaknesses. En Klatt, M. (Ed.). Institutionalized reason: The jurisprudence of Robert Alexy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Joseph, P.A. (2011). The rule of law: foundational norm. En: Ekins, R. (Ed.). Modern challenges to the rule of law. Wellington, New Zealand: Lexis Nexis.Jowell, J. (2015). The rule of law: A practical and universal concept. En Jowell, J., Thomas, C. and van Zyl Smit, J. (Ed.). Rule of law symposium 2014. The importance of the rule of law in promoting development. Singapore, Singapore: Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law y Singapore Academy of Law.Moens, G. (1994). The wrongs of a constitutional entrenched bill of rights. En Stephenson, M.A and Turner, C. (Ed.). Australia: Republic or monarchy? Legal and constitutional issues. Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland.Raz, J. (2012). The rule of law and its virtue. The authority of law. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Shklar, J.N. (1987). Political theory and the rule of law. En Hutchenson, A.C. and Monahan, P. (Ed.). The rule of law: Ideal or ideology? Toronto, Canada: Carswell.Summers, R.S. (1998). The principles of the rule of law. Notre Dame Law Review, 74, 1691-1792.Sunstein, C.R. (1996). Legal reasoning and political conflict. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press.Tamanaha, B. (2004). On the rule of law. History, politics, theory. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press.Urbina, F.J. (2012). A critique of proportionality. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 57 (1), 49-80.Waldron, J. (1999). Law and disagreement. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Waldron, J. (2011). The rule of law and the importance of procedure. En Fleming, J.E. (Ed.). Getting to the rule of law. New York: New York University Press.Webber, G. (2009). The negotiable constitution. On the limits of rights. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press.Webber, G. (2013). Rights and the rule of law in the balance. Law Quarterly Review, 129, 399-419.Yowell, P. (2012). Legislación, Common law y la virtud de la claridad. Revista Chilena de Derecho, 39 (2), 481-512.Zimmermann, A. (2007). The rule of law as a culture of legality: Legal and extra-legal elements for the realization of the rule of law in society. Murdoch University Law Review, 14, 10-31.Núm. 2 , Año 2016 : Julio - Diciembrehttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/download/3328/3090Derechos de autor 2016 Jurídicashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Candia-Falcón, Gonzalooai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/158992024-07-16T21:44:04Z

La concepción sustantiva del estado de derecho: problemáticas y desafíos

Publicaciones similares