Quine y el pragmatismo clásico

A menudo se asocia a Quine con los filósofos pragmatistas o al menos se le atribuye una posición  consonante  con el pragmatismo. En el presente ensayo examino la relación entre la obra de Quine y la de  los  pragmatistas  clásicos:&am...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2010
Institución:
Universidad de Caldas
Repositorio:
Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/14813
Acceso en línea:
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/546
Palabra clave:
Quine
Pragmatism
Carnap
Naturalism
Quine
Pragmatismo
Carnap
Naturalismo
Rights
openAccess
License
Derechos de autor 2010 Discusiones Filosóficas
id REPOUCALDA_617208a7d2059732d3c3900dac1be0f1
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/14813
network_acronym_str REPOUCALDA
network_name_str Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quine y el pragmatismo clásico
Quine and the pragmatism classic
title Quine y el pragmatismo clásico
spellingShingle Quine y el pragmatismo clásico
Quine
Pragmatism
Carnap
Naturalism
Quine
Pragmatismo
Carnap
Naturalismo
title_short Quine y el pragmatismo clásico
title_full Quine y el pragmatismo clásico
title_fullStr Quine y el pragmatismo clásico
title_full_unstemmed Quine y el pragmatismo clásico
title_sort Quine y el pragmatismo clásico
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Quine
Pragmatism
Carnap
Naturalism
Quine
Pragmatismo
Carnap
Naturalismo
topic Quine
Pragmatism
Carnap
Naturalism
Quine
Pragmatismo
Carnap
Naturalismo
description A menudo se asocia a Quine con los filósofos pragmatistas o al menos se le atribuye una posición  consonante  con el pragmatismo. En el presente ensayo examino la relación entre la obra de Quine y la de  los  pragmatistas  clásicos:  Peirce, James y Dewey. El recorrido por los escritos de Quine mostrará varias  similitudes con la  doctrina de los límites de la experiencia propuesta por James, y al mismo tiempo diferencias significativas con el  naturalismo de Dewey y el pragmatismo de Peirce. El balance de este recorrido es que aunque existen algunos elementos en común entre los pragmatistas clásicos y Quine, es imposible afirmar que haya existido un interés de parte de Quine de asumir como propias las tesis pragmatistas para desarrollarlas en direcciones novedosas.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-06-18 00:00:00
2010-06-18 00:00:00
2010-06-18
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
Sección Artículos
Journal Article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Text
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 0124-6127
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/546
2462-9596
identifier_str_mv 0124-6127
2462-9596
url https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/546
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 79
16
59
11
Discusiones Filosóficas
BERGSTRÖM, L. & FØLLESDAL, D. (2001). Interview with Willard Van Orman Quine in November 1993. En: FØLLESDAL, D. (Ed.). Philosophy of Quine, Volume 1: General, Reviews, and Analytic/Synthetic. New York: Garland.
CARNAP, R. (1950/1956). Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology. En: Meaning and Necessity. 2nd enlarged edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
DEWEY, J. (1929). Experience and Nature. Chicago: Open Court.
HAACK, Susan. (2004). Pragmatism, Old and New. En: Contemporary Pragmatism. vol.1, no.1, p. 3-41.
HARRIS, J. F. (1992). Against Relativism: A Philosophical Defense of Method. La Salle: Open Court.
HAY, W. H. (1968). Lewis’ Relation to Logical Empiricism. En: SCHILPP, P. A. (Ed.). The Philosophy of C.I. Lewis. Chicago: Open Court
HOOKWAY, Christopher. (1988). Quine: Lenguage, Experience and Reality. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
JAMES, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt.
________. (1897/1956). The Will to Believe. En: The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. New York: Dover.
________. (1907). Pragmatism. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.
KOSKINEN, H. J. & PIHLSTRÖM, S. (2006). Quine and Pragmatism. En: Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. vol.42, no. 6, p. 309-346.
LEPORE, E. (2004). An Interview with Donald Davidson. En: DAVIDSON, D. Problems of Rationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
LEWIS, C. I. (1929). Mind and the World Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge. New York: Charles Scribners.
________. (1946). An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation. La Salle: Open Court.
MORRIS, C. (1963). Pragmatism and Logical Empiricism. En: SCHILPP, P. A. (Ed.). The Philosophy of Rudolph Carnap. Chicago: Open Court, 1963.
PEIRCE, C. S. (1878/1998). How to Make Our Ideas Clear. En: The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings, Vol. 1. Edited by The Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
________. (1903/1998). What Pragmatism Is. En: The Essential Peirce, Vol. 2. Edited by The Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
PUTNAM, H. (1994). “A Comparison of Something with Something Else”. En: Words and Life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
________. (1995). Pragmatism, An Open Question. Oxford: Blackwell. QUINE, W. V. (1933). “Review of Peirce’s Collected Papers, Volume 2”. En: Isis 19. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 220-229.
________. (1935a). Review of Peirce’s Collected Papers, Volume 3. En: Isis. vol. 22, p. 285-297.
________. (1935b). Review of Peirce’s Collected Papers, Volume 4. En: Isis. vol. 22, p. 551-553.
________. (1953a). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. En: From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
________. (1953b). Reference and Modality. En: From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
________. (1953c). Identity, Ostension, and Hypostasis. En: From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
________. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
________. (1969a). Natural Kinds. En: Ontological Relativity & Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.
________. (1969b). Preface to Ontological Relativity & Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.
________. (1976). Homage to Rudolph Carnap. En: Ways of Paradox. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
________. (1981). Things and Their Place in Theories. En: Theories and Things. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
________. (1991). Two Dogmas in Retrospect. En: Canadian Journal of Philosophy. vol. 21, p. 265-274.
________. (1995). Peirce’s Logic. En: Selected Logic Papers. Enlarged edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
________. (1998). Autobiography of W. V. Quine. En: HAHN, E. y SCHILPP, P. A. (Eds.). The Philosophy of W. V. Quine. 2a. ed. Perú: Open Court.
TOMIDA, Y. (1993). Interview Between W. V. Quine and Yasuhiko Tomida. En: Willard Van Orman Quine home page by Douglas Quine. [Disponible en]: http://www.wvquine.org/quine-tomida.html.
Núm. 16 , Año 2010 : Enero - Junio
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/546/471
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2010 Discusiones Filosóficas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2010 Discusiones Filosóficas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Caldas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Caldas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/546
institution Universidad de Caldas
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1836145085953081344
spelling Quine y el pragmatismo clásicoQuine and the pragmatism classicQuinePragmatismCarnapNaturalismQuinePragmatismoCarnapNaturalismoA menudo se asocia a Quine con los filósofos pragmatistas o al menos se le atribuye una posición  consonante  con el pragmatismo. En el presente ensayo examino la relación entre la obra de Quine y la de  los  pragmatistas  clásicos:  Peirce, James y Dewey. El recorrido por los escritos de Quine mostrará varias  similitudes con la  doctrina de los límites de la experiencia propuesta por James, y al mismo tiempo diferencias significativas con el  naturalismo de Dewey y el pragmatismo de Peirce. El balance de este recorrido es que aunque existen algunos elementos en común entre los pragmatistas clásicos y Quine, es imposible afirmar que haya existido un interés de parte de Quine de asumir como propias las tesis pragmatistas para desarrollarlas en direcciones novedosas.Quine has often been associated with the Pragmatists or at the very least his work has been found to be consonant with Pragmatism. In this essay I examine the relation between Quine’s work and that of the classical pragmatists: Peirce, James, and Dewey. My study of Quine’s writings will reveal several similarities with James’ doctrine of the limits of experience, and at the same time it will bring to light significant differences with Dewey’s naturalism and Peirce’s Pragmatism. On balance, although there are some elements in common between the classical Pragmatists and Quine, it is not possible to assert that there ever was any interest on Quine’s part to adopt the theses of the Pragmatists in order to develop them in novel directions.Universidad de Caldas2010-06-18 00:00:002010-06-18 00:00:002010-06-18Artículo de revistaSección ArtículosJournal Articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1application/pdf0124-6127https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/5462462-9596https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/546spa79165911Discusiones FilosóficasBERGSTRÖM, L. & FØLLESDAL, D. (2001). Interview with Willard Van Orman Quine in November 1993. En: FØLLESDAL, D. (Ed.). Philosophy of Quine, Volume 1: General, Reviews, and Analytic/Synthetic. New York: Garland.CARNAP, R. (1950/1956). Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology. En: Meaning and Necessity. 2nd enlarged edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.DEWEY, J. (1929). Experience and Nature. Chicago: Open Court.HAACK, Susan. (2004). Pragmatism, Old and New. En: Contemporary Pragmatism. vol.1, no.1, p. 3-41.HARRIS, J. F. (1992). Against Relativism: A Philosophical Defense of Method. La Salle: Open Court.HAY, W. H. (1968). Lewis’ Relation to Logical Empiricism. En: SCHILPP, P. A. (Ed.). The Philosophy of C.I. Lewis. Chicago: Open CourtHOOKWAY, Christopher. (1988). Quine: Lenguage, Experience and Reality. Stanford: Stanford University Press.JAMES, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt.________. (1897/1956). The Will to Believe. En: The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. New York: Dover.________. (1907). Pragmatism. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.KOSKINEN, H. J. & PIHLSTRÖM, S. (2006). Quine and Pragmatism. En: Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. vol.42, no. 6, p. 309-346.LEPORE, E. (2004). An Interview with Donald Davidson. En: DAVIDSON, D. Problems of Rationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.LEWIS, C. I. (1929). Mind and the World Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge. New York: Charles Scribners.________. (1946). An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation. La Salle: Open Court.MORRIS, C. (1963). Pragmatism and Logical Empiricism. En: SCHILPP, P. A. (Ed.). The Philosophy of Rudolph Carnap. Chicago: Open Court, 1963.PEIRCE, C. S. (1878/1998). How to Make Our Ideas Clear. En: The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings, Vol. 1. Edited by The Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.________. (1903/1998). What Pragmatism Is. En: The Essential Peirce, Vol. 2. Edited by The Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.PUTNAM, H. (1994). “A Comparison of Something with Something Else”. En: Words and Life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.________. (1995). Pragmatism, An Open Question. Oxford: Blackwell. QUINE, W. V. (1933). “Review of Peirce’s Collected Papers, Volume 2”. En: Isis 19. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 220-229.________. (1935a). Review of Peirce’s Collected Papers, Volume 3. En: Isis. vol. 22, p. 285-297.________. (1935b). Review of Peirce’s Collected Papers, Volume 4. En: Isis. vol. 22, p. 551-553.________. (1953a). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. En: From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.________. (1953b). Reference and Modality. En: From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.________. (1953c). Identity, Ostension, and Hypostasis. En: From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.________. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.________. (1969a). Natural Kinds. En: Ontological Relativity & Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.________. (1969b). Preface to Ontological Relativity & Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.________. (1976). Homage to Rudolph Carnap. En: Ways of Paradox. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.________. (1981). Things and Their Place in Theories. En: Theories and Things. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.________. (1991). Two Dogmas in Retrospect. En: Canadian Journal of Philosophy. vol. 21, p. 265-274.________. (1995). Peirce’s Logic. En: Selected Logic Papers. Enlarged edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.________. (1998). Autobiography of W. V. Quine. En: HAHN, E. y SCHILPP, P. A. (Eds.). The Philosophy of W. V. Quine. 2a. ed. Perú: Open Court.TOMIDA, Y. (1993). Interview Between W. V. Quine and Yasuhiko Tomida. En: Willard Van Orman Quine home page by Douglas Quine. [Disponible en]: http://www.wvquine.org/quine-tomida.html.Núm. 16 , Año 2010 : Enero - Juniohttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/546/471Derechos de autor 2010 Discusiones Filosóficashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Páez, Andrésoai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/148132024-07-16T21:49:13Z