Logical deviance and the constitutive a priori

Lo que llamaré ‘la objeción lógica irregular’ es una línea de ataque en contra del principio común y convincente&nbsp; de que nuestra justificación de las verdades lógicas se fundamenta en la comprensión de sus conceptos&nbsp; constituyentes. Esta objeción busca socavar la posibilida...

Full description

Autores:

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2014

Institución:: Universidad de Caldas

Repositorio:: Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas

Idioma:: eng

id	REPOUCALDA_3e31d7de6fd7130751933985453374c1
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/15067
network_acronym_str	REPOUCALDA
network_name_str	Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv	Logical deviance and the constitutive a priori La irregularidad lógica y lo a priori constitutivo
title	Logical deviance and the constitutive a priori
spellingShingle	Logical deviance and the constitutive a priori Conocimiento a priori epistemología de la lógica Timothy Williamson A priori knowledge epistemology of logic Timothy Williamson
title_short	Logical deviance and the constitutive a priori
title_full	Logical deviance and the constitutive a priori
title_fullStr	Logical deviance and the constitutive a priori
title_full_unstemmed	Logical deviance and the constitutive a priori
title_sort	Logical deviance and the constitutive a priori
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv	Conocimiento a priori epistemología de la lógica Timothy Williamson A priori knowledge epistemology of logic Timothy Williamson
topic	Conocimiento a priori epistemología de la lógica Timothy Williamson A priori knowledge epistemology of logic Timothy Williamson
description	Lo que llamaré ‘la objeción lógica irregular’ es una línea de ataque en contra del principio común y convincente&nbsp; de que nuestra justificación de las verdades lógicas se fundamenta en la comprensión de sus conceptos&nbsp; constituyentes. Esta objeción busca socavar la posibilidad de cualquier conexión constitutiva profunda, en la&nbsp; epistemología de la lógica (y también más allá), entre la comprensión y la justificación. Mi tesis es que, si bien la objeción lógica irregular no llega a demostrar que este principio tradicional debe ser rechazado, no obstante,&nbsp; sirve para reforzar algunos refinamientos importantes.
publishDate	2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv	2014-06-20 00:00:00 2014-06-20 00:00:00 2014-06-20
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista Sección Artículos Journal Article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Text info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv	0124-6127 https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/754 2462-9596
identifier_str_mv	0124-6127 2462-9596
url	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/754
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv	85 24 67 15 Discusiones Filosóficas Beall, J.C. and Greg Restall. Logical Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print. Berger, Alan, ed. Kripke on the Incoherency of Adopting a Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Print. Boghossian, Paul. “Analyticity”. Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Eds. Hale, Bob and Crispin Wright. London: Blackwell Press, 1999. Print. ---. “Knowledge of Logic”. New Essays on the A Priori. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print. ---. “Williamson on the A Priori and the Analytic”. Philosophy & Phenomenological Research. 2010: 488-97. Print. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke, Eds. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print. BonJour, Laurence. In Defense of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. Print. Carnap, Rudolf. “Empiricism, Semantics, Ontology”. Revue Internationale de Philosophie. 1951: 20-40. Print. Devitt, Michael. “No Place for the a priori”. What Place for the A Priori? Eds. Schaffer, Michael and Michael Veber. Chicago: Open Court, 2011. Print. Flanagan, Brian. “Analyticity and the Deviant Logician”. Acta Analytica. 2013: 345-52. Print. Friedman, Michael. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998. Print. ---. “Transcendental Philosophy and A Priori Knowledge: A Neo-Kantian Perspective”. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print. ---. “Einstein, Kant, and the A Priori”. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements. Oct. 2008: 95-112. Print. Haack, Susan. Deviant Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974. Print. Horwich, Paul. “Stipulation, Meaning, and Apriority”. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print. ---. Reflections on Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print. Pap, Arthur. The A Priori in Physical Theory. New York: King’s Crown Press, 1946. Print. Peacocke, Christopher. “The Programme of Moderate Rationalism”. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print. ---. The Realm of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print. ---. “Understanding, Modality, Logical Operators”. Philosophy & Phenomenological Research. 2011: 472-80. Print. Quine, Willard van Orman. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”. Philosophical Review. 1951: 20-43. Print. ---. Philosophy of Logic. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970. Print. Railton, Peter. “Wittgenstein on the Normativity of Logic”. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print. ---. Facts, Values, and Norms. Cambridge University Press, 2003. Print. Reichenbach, Hans. The Theory of Relativity and A Priori Knowledge. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1965. Print. Russell, Gillian. “Metaphysical Analyticity and the Epistemology of Logic”. Philosophical Studies. Forthcoming. Schaffer, Michael and Michael Veber, Eds. What Place for the A Priori? Chicago: Open Court, 2011. Print. Stump. David. “Defending Conventions as Functionally A Priori Knowledge”. Philosophy of Science. Dec. 2003: 1149-60. Print. ---. “A Reconsideration of the Status of Newton’s Laws”. What Place for the A Priori? Eds. Schaffer, Michael and Michael Veber. Chicago: Open Court, 2011. Print. Williamson, Timothy. “Conceptual Truth”. The Aristotelian Society. 2006 (Sup.): 1-41. Print. ---. The Philosophy of Philosophy. London: Blackwell Press, 2008. Print. ---. “Reply to Kornblith”. Analysis. 2009: 123-6. Print. ---. “Reply to Boghossian”. Philosophy & Phenomenological Research. 2011: 498-506. Print. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge, 1921. Print. ---. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Oxford: Blackwell, 1953. Print. Núm. 24 , Año 2014 : Enero - Junio https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/754/677
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv	Derechos de autor 2014 Discusiones Filosóficas https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	Derechos de autor 2014 Discusiones Filosóficas https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Caldas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Caldas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/754
institution	Universidad de Caldas
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_	1836145009647157248
spelling	Logical deviance and the constitutive a prioriLa irregularidad lógica y lo a priori constitutivoConocimiento a prioriepistemología de la lógicaTimothy WilliamsonA priori knowledgeepistemology of logicTimothy WilliamsonLo que llamaré ‘la objeción lógica irregular’ es una línea de ataque en contra del principio común y convincente&nbsp; de que nuestra justificación de las verdades lógicas se fundamenta en la comprensión de sus conceptos&nbsp; constituyentes. Esta objeción busca socavar la posibilidad de cualquier conexión constitutiva profunda, en la&nbsp; epistemología de la lógica (y también más allá), entre la comprensión y la justificación. Mi tesis es que, si bien la objeción lógica irregular no llega a demostrar que este principio tradicional debe ser rechazado, no obstante,&nbsp; sirve para reforzar algunos refinamientos importantes.What I will call ‘the deviant logician objection’ is one line of attack against the common and compelling tenet&nbsp; that our justification for logical truths is grounded in our understanding of their constituent concepts. This&nbsp; objection seeks to undermine the possibility of any deep constitutive connection, in the epistemology of logic&nbsp; (and also beyond), between understanding and justification. My thesis is that while the deviant logician&nbsp; objection falls short of proving that this traditional tenet must be rejected, nonetheless it serves to bolster some important refinements.Universidad de Caldas2014-06-20 00:00:002014-06-20 00:00:002014-06-20Artículo de revistaSección ArtículosJournal Articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1application/pdf0124-6127https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/7542462-9596https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/754eng85246715Discusiones FilosóficasBeall, J.C. and Greg Restall. Logical Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print.Berger, Alan, ed. Kripke on the Incoherency of Adopting a Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Print.Boghossian, Paul. “Analyticity”. Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Eds. Hale, Bob and Crispin Wright. London: Blackwell Press, 1999. Print.---. “Knowledge of Logic”. New Essays on the A Priori. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print.---. “Williamson on the A Priori and the Analytic”. Philosophy & Phenomenological Research. 2010: 488-97. Print.Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke, Eds. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print.BonJour, Laurence. In Defense of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. Print.Carnap, Rudolf. “Empiricism, Semantics, Ontology”. Revue Internationale de Philosophie. 1951: 20-40. Print.Devitt, Michael. “No Place for the a priori”. What Place for the A Priori? Eds. Schaffer, Michael and Michael Veber. Chicago: Open Court, 2011. Print.Flanagan, Brian. “Analyticity and the Deviant Logician”. Acta Analytica. 2013: 345-52. Print.Friedman, Michael. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998. Print.---. “Transcendental Philosophy and A Priori Knowledge: A Neo-Kantian Perspective”. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print.---. “Einstein, Kant, and the A Priori”. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements. Oct. 2008: 95-112. Print.Haack, Susan. Deviant Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974. Print.Horwich, Paul. “Stipulation, Meaning, and Apriority”. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print.---. Reflections on Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print.Pap, Arthur. The A Priori in Physical Theory. New York: King’s Crown Press, 1946. Print.Peacocke, Christopher. “The Programme of Moderate Rationalism”. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print.---. The Realm of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print.---. “Understanding, Modality, Logical Operators”. Philosophy & Phenomenological Research. 2011: 472-80. Print.Quine, Willard van Orman. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”. Philosophical Review. 1951: 20-43. Print.---. Philosophy of Logic. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970. Print.Railton, Peter. “Wittgenstein on the Normativity of Logic”. Eds. Boghossian, Paul and Christopher Peacocke. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Print.---. Facts, Values, and Norms. Cambridge University Press, 2003. Print.Reichenbach, Hans. The Theory of Relativity and A Priori Knowledge. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1965. Print.Russell, Gillian. “Metaphysical Analyticity and the Epistemology of Logic”. Philosophical Studies. Forthcoming.Schaffer, Michael and Michael Veber, Eds. What Place for the A Priori? Chicago: Open Court, 2011. Print.Stump. David. “Defending Conventions as Functionally A Priori Knowledge”. Philosophy of Science. Dec. 2003: 1149-60. Print.---. “A Reconsideration of the Status of Newton’s Laws”. What Place for the A Priori? Eds. Schaffer, Michael and Michael Veber. Chicago: Open Court, 2011. Print.Williamson, Timothy. “Conceptual Truth”. The Aristotelian Society. 2006 (Sup.): 1-41. Print.---. The Philosophy of Philosophy. London: Blackwell Press, 2008. Print.---. “Reply to Kornblith”. Analysis. 2009: 123-6. Print.---. “Reply to Boghossian”. Philosophy & Phenomenological Research. 2011: 498-506. Print.Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge, 1921. Print.---. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Oxford: Blackwell, 1953. Print.Núm. 24 , Año 2014 : Enero - Juniohttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/754/677Derechos de autor 2014 Discusiones Filosóficashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Sullivan, Arthuroai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/150672024-07-16T21:39:21Z

Logical deviance and the constitutive a priori

Publicaciones similares