¿Vecino o desconocido? Ausencia de discriminación vocal en la rana arlequín venenosa Oophaga histrionica (Anura: Dendrobatidae)

Ilustraciones, tablas.

Autores:

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2025

Institución:: Universidad de Caldas

Repositorio:: Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas

Idioma:: spa

id	REPOUCALDA_3bc425b61dfe6ac57b8c46484abbdf2b
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/26259
network_acronym_str	REPOUCALDA
network_name_str	Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv	¿Vecino o desconocido? Ausencia de discriminación vocal en la rana arlequín venenosa Oophaga histrionica (Anura: Dendrobatidae)
title	¿Vecino o desconocido? Ausencia de discriminación vocal en la rana arlequín venenosa Oophaga histrionica (Anura: Dendrobatidae)
spellingShingle	¿Vecino o desconocido? Ausencia de discriminación vocal en la rana arlequín venenosa Oophaga histrionica (Anura: Dendrobatidae) 570 - Biología Comunicación acústica Discriminación individual Firmas vocales Querido enemigo Territorialidad Acoustic communication Dear enemy Individual discrimination Territoriality Vocal signatures Ecología animal Etología Comportamiento animal
title_short	¿Vecino o desconocido? Ausencia de discriminación vocal en la rana arlequín venenosa Oophaga histrionica (Anura: Dendrobatidae)
title_full	¿Vecino o desconocido? Ausencia de discriminación vocal en la rana arlequín venenosa Oophaga histrionica (Anura: Dendrobatidae)
title_fullStr	¿Vecino o desconocido? Ausencia de discriminación vocal en la rana arlequín venenosa Oophaga histrionica (Anura: Dendrobatidae)
title_full_unstemmed	¿Vecino o desconocido? Ausencia de discriminación vocal en la rana arlequín venenosa Oophaga histrionica (Anura: Dendrobatidae)
title_sort	¿Vecino o desconocido? Ausencia de discriminación vocal en la rana arlequín venenosa Oophaga histrionica (Anura: Dendrobatidae)
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv	Gutiérrez-Cárdenas, Paul David Alfonso Universidad de Caldas Grupo de Ecología y Diversidad de Anfibios y Reptiles (Categoría B)
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv	570 - Biología Comunicación acústica Discriminación individual Firmas vocales Querido enemigo Territorialidad Acoustic communication Dear enemy Individual discrimination Territoriality Vocal signatures Ecología animal Etología Comportamiento animal
topic	570 - Biología Comunicación acústica Discriminación individual Firmas vocales Querido enemigo Territorialidad Acoustic communication Dear enemy Individual discrimination Territoriality Vocal signatures Ecología animal Etología Comportamiento animal
description	Ilustraciones, tablas.
publishDate	2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv	2025-11-20T15:19:15Z 2025-11-20T15:19:15Z 2025-11-19
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	Trabajo de grado - Pregrado http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f Text info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv	https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/26259 Universidad de Caldas Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Caldas repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co
url	https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/26259
identifier_str_mv	Universidad de Caldas Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Caldas repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv	Audacity Team. (2023). Audacity (Version 3.7) [software]. https://www.audacityteam.org/ Baca, G. X. (2024). Manual de Audacity [manual de usuario]. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. https://manual-audacity.recursos.uoc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Manual-de-Audacity.pdf Bee, M. A. (2003). A test of the "dear enemy effect" in the strawberry dart-poison frog (Dendrobates pumilio). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 54, 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265003–0657–5 Bee, M. A. (2016). Social recognition in anurans. En M. A. Bee & C. T. Miller (Eds.), Psychological mechanisms in animal communication (Vol. 5, pp. 169–198). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-319–48690–1_7 Bee, M. A., Cook, J. M., Love, E. K., O'Bryan, L. R., Pettitt, B. A., Schrode, K., & Vélez, A. (2010). Assessing acoustic signal variability and the potential for sexual selection and social recognition in boreal chorus frogs (Pseudacris maculata). Ethology, 116(6), 564–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439–0310.2010.01773.x Bee, M. A., & Gerhardt, H. C. (2001). Neighbour-stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): I. Acoustic basis. Animal Behaviour, 62(6), 1129–1140. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1851 Bee, M. A., & Gerhardt, H. C. (2002). Individual voice recognition in a territorial frog (Rana catesbeiana). Proceedings: Biological Sciences, 269(1499), 1443–1448. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2041 Bee, M. A., Kozich, C. E., Blackwell, K. J. and Gerhardt, H. C. (2001), Individual variation in advertisement calls of territorial male Green Frogs, Rana clamitans: Implications for individual discrimination. Ethology, 107,65–84. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439–0310.2001.00640.x Bee, M. A., Reichert, M. S., & Tumulty, J. (2016). Assessment and recognition of rivals in anuran contests. En Advances in the Study of Behavior (pp. 161–249). Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.asb.2016.01.001 Beecher, M. D. (1989). Signalling systems for individual recognition: An information theory approach. Animal Behaviour, 38(2), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003–3472(89)80087–9 Betancourth-Cundar, M., & Palacios-Rodriguez, P. (2022). Reproductive behaviors promote ecological and phenotypic sexual differentiation in the critically endangered lehmann’s poison frog. Evolutionary Ecology, 36(6), 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-022-10207-3 Betancourth-Cundar, M., Amézquita, A., & Cadena, C. D. (2024a). Novel and classical methods similarly describe variation in territory size among males in neotropical poison frogs with contrasting reproductive and behavioral strategies. Evolutionary Ecology, 38(5), 799–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-024-10309-0 Betancourth-Cundar, M., Canoine, V., Fusani, L., & Cadena, C. D. (2024b). Does testosterone underlie the interplay between male traits and territorial behavior in neotropical poison frogs? Hormones and Behavior, 162, 105547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2024.105547 Bourne, G., Collins, C., Holder, A., & McCarthy, C. (2001). Vocal communication and reproductive behavior of the frog Colostethus beebei in Guyana. Journal of Herpetology, 35(2), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.2307/1566118 Bradbury, J. W., & Vehrencamp, S. L. (2011). Principles of animal communication (2nd ed.). Sinauer Associates. Bunnell, P. (1973). Vocalizations in the territorial behavior of the frog Dendrobates pumilio. Copeia, 1973(2), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.2307/1442966 Christensen, C., & Radford, A. N. (2018). Dear enemies or nasty neighbors? Causes and consequences of variation in the responses of group-living species to territorial intrusions. Behavioral Ecology, 29(5), 1004–1013. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary010 Chuang, M. F. (2006). Overwintering tadpoles of Rana adenopleura in a subtropical lowland of Taiwan (Tesis de maestría). National Changhua University of Education. Chuang, M. F., Bee, M. A., & Kam, Y. C. (2013). Short amplexus duration in a territorial anuran: a possible adaptation in response to male-male competition. PLoS ONE, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083116 Chuang, M. F., Kam, Y.-C., & Bee, M. A. (2017). Territorial olive frogs display lower aggression towards neighbours than strangers based on individual vocal signatures. Animal Behaviour, 123, 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.11.001 Colombia en Mapas (2020). Parques Nacionales Naturales PNN. https://www.colombiaenmapas.gov.co/?e=-76.23929544372373,5.046566134843802,75.49085184020782,5.533373985795281,4686&b=igac&l=178&u=0&t=2&servicio=62 Crothers, L. R., & Cummings, M. E. (2015). A multifunctional warning signal behaves as an agonistic status signal in a poison frog. Behavioral Ecology, 26(2), 560–568. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru231 Crump, M. L. (1972). Territoriality and mating behavior in Dendrobates gerus (Anura: Dendrobatidae). Herpetologica, 28(3), 195–198. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3890619 Davis, M. S. (1987). Acoustically mediated neighbor recognition in the North American bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 21(3), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303209 Duellman, W. E. (1992). Reproductive strategies of frogs. Scientific American, 267(1), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0792–80 Dyson, M. L., Reichert, M. S., & Halliday, T. R. (2013). Contests in amphibians. En I. C. W. Hardy & M. Briffa (Eds.), Animal contests (pp. 228–257). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051248 Equipo de desarrollo de QGIS. (2024). Sistema de información geográfica de QGIS: guía de usuario. Proyecto de la Fundación Geoespacial de código abierto. https://docs.qgis.org/3.34/es/docs/user_manual/index.html#qgis-user-guide Feng, A. S., Arch, V. S., Yu, Z., Yu, X.-J., Xu, Z.-M. & Shen, J.-X. (2009). Neighbor–stranger discrimination in concave-eared torrent frogs, Odorrana tormota. Ethology, 115, 851–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439–0310.2009.01666.x Fisher, J. (1954). Evolution and bird sociality. En J. Huxley, A. C. Hardy & E. B. Ford (Eds.), Evolution as a process (pp. 71–82). George Allen & Unwin. https://wellcomecollection.org/works/vf9q9akq Fogo, B. R., Sanches, F. H., & Costa, T. M. (2019). Testing the dear enemy relationship in fiddler crabs: is there a difference between fighting conspecific and heterospecific opponents? Behavioural Processes, 162, 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2019.02.001 Fouilloux, C. A., Goyes Vallejos, J. & Tumulty, J. P. (2024). Home is where the high-quality resources are: nursery characteristics and territory distribution suggest reproductive resource defense in golden rocket frogs. Evolutionary Ecology, 38, 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-023-10273-1 Gardner, E. A., & Graves, B. M. (2005). Responses of resident male Dendrobates pumilio to territory intruders. Journal of Herpetology, 39(2), 248–253. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4092899 Garrido-Priego, M., Tószeghi, M., Angiolani-Larrea, F. N., Valencia-Aguilar, A., Bégué, L., Núñez, R., Culebras, J., Ringler, M., Stynoski, J. L., & Ringler, E. (2024). Clutch attendance and call parameters are linked to mating success in a glassfrog with paternal care. Behavioral Ecology, 35(6), arae078. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arae078 Gerhardt, H. C. (1991). Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Animal Behaviour, 42(4), 615–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003–3472(05)80245–3 Gerhardt, H. C., & Bee, M. A. (2007). Recognition and localization of acoustic signals. En P. M. Narins, A. S. Feng, R. R. Fay, & A. N. Popper (Eds.), Hearing and sound communication in amphibians (Vol. 28, pp. 113–146). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-47796-1_5 Gerhardt, H. C., & Huber, F. (2002). Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: Common problems and diverse solutions. University of Chicago Press. Getty, T. (1987). Dear enemies and the prisoner's dilemma: why should territorial neighbors form defensive coalitions? American Zoologist, 27(2), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/27.2.327 Gil-Guevara, O., & Amézquita, A. (2020). Adjusted phonotactic reactions to sound amplitude and pulse number mediate territoriality in the harlequin poison frog. Behavioural Processes, 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104249 Giraldo, A., Nadachowski, E., & Camargo, C. J. (1998). Diagnostico ambiental de comunidades negras del Alto San Juan. Corporación Autónoma Regional de Risaralda (CARDER) Gómez, C. J., & Amézquita, A. (2024). Ecological and behavioral correlates of homing performance in the egg-feeding poison frog Oophaga histrionica. Evolutionary Ecology, 38, 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682–023–10283-z González, C. G., Lise, A. V., & Felpeto, A. B. (2013). Tratamiento de datos con R, Statistica y SPSS. Ediciones Díaz de Santos. Grant, T., Frost, D. R., Caldwell, J. P., Gagliardo, R., Haddad, C. F. B., Kok, P. J. R., Means, D. B., Noonan, B. P., Schargel, W. E., & Wheeler, W. C. (2006). Phylogenetic systematics of dartpoison frogs and their relatives (Amphibia: Athesphatanura: Dendrobatidae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 2006(299), 1–262. https://doi.org/10.1206/00030090(2006)299[1:SPOTDP]2.0.CO;2 Gingras, B., Boeckle, M., Herbst, C. T., & Fitch, W. T. (2013). Call acoustics reflect body size across four clades of anurans. Journal of Zoology, 289(1), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14697998.2012.00973.x Hödl, W., & Amézquita, A. (2001). Visual signaling in anuran amphibians. En M. J. Ryan (Ed.), Anuran communication (pp. 121–141). Smithsonian Institution Press. Holdridge, L. R. (1996). Ecología basada en zonas de vida. Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura, San José, Costa Rica. 216 pp. Howard, R. D. (1978). The evolution of mating strategies in bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana. Evolution, 32(4), 850–871. https://doi.org/10.2307/2407499 Husak, J. F., & Fox, S. F. (2003). Adult male collared lizards, Crotaphytus collaris, increase aggression towards displaced neighbours. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.2058 Jin, L., Liang, J., Fan, Q., Yu, J., Sun, K., & Wang, H. (2020). Male Great Tits (Parus major) adjust dear enemy effect expression in different breeding stages. Journal of Ornithology, 162(1), 221229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336–020–01815–3 Jouventin, P., Aubin, T., & Lengagne, T. (1999). Finding a parent in a king penguin colony: the acoustic system of individual recognition. Animal Behaviour. 57, 1175–1183. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1086 Jungfer K. H., Weygoldt, P., & Juraske, N. (1996). Dendrobates vicentei, ein neuer pfeilgiftfrosch aus zentral-Panama. Herpetofauna, 18(103), 17–26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317170638 K. Lisa Yang Center for Conservation Bioacoustics at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology. (2024). Raven Pro: Interactive Sound Analysis Software (Version 1.6.5) [software]. Ithaca, NY: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Disponible en https://www.ravensoundsoftware.com/ Kinsler, L. E., Frey, A. R., Coppens, A. B., & Sanders, J. V. (2000). Fundamentals of acoustics (4th ed.). Wiley. Keppel, G. & Wickens T. D. (1991). Design and analysis: a researcher’s handbook (4th ed.). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River. Köhler, J., Jansen, M., Rodríguez, A., Kok, P., Toledo, L. F., Emmrich, M., Glaw, F., Haddad, C., Rödel, M. O., & Vences, M. (2017). The use of bioacoustics in anuran taxonomy: theory, terminology, methods and recommendations for best practice. Zootaxa, 4251(1), 1–124. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4251.1.1 Kroodsma, D. E. (1989a). Inappropriate experimental designs impede progress in bioacoustic research: A reply. Animal Behaviour, 38(4), 717–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/S00033472(89)80020-X Kroodsma, D. E. (1989b). Suggested experimental designs for song playbacks. Animal Behaviour, 37(4), 600–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003–3472(89)90039–0 Lesbarrères, D., & Lodé, T. (2002). Variations in male calls and responses to an unfamiliar advertisement call in a territorial breeding anuran, Rana dalmatina: evidence for a “dear enemy” effect. Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 14(4), 287–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2002.9522731 Limerick, S. (1980). Courtship behavior and oviposition of the poison-arrow frog Dendrobates pumilio. Herpetologica, 36(1), 69–71. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3891857 Lodé, T., & Lesbarrères, D. (2004). Multiple paternity in Rana dalmatina, a monogamous territorial breeding anuran. The Science of Nature, 91(1), 44–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114–003–0491–7 Martin, W. F. (1972). Evolution of vocalization in the genus Bufo. En W. F. Blair (Ed.), Evolution in the genus Bufo (pp. 279-309). University of Texas Press. McVey, M. E., Zahary, R. G., Perry, D., & MacDougal, J. (1981). Territoriality and homing behavior in dart frog (Dendrobates pumilio). Copeia, 1981(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2307/1444035 Meuche, I., Brusa, O., Linsenmair, K. E., & Pröhl, H. (2013). Only distance matters – non-choosy females in a poison frog population. Frontiers in Zoology, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-999410-29 Meuche, I., Linsenmair, K. E., & Pröhl, H. (2011). Female territoriality in the strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio). Copeia, 2011(3), 351–356. https://doi.org/10.1643/CE-08-135 Meuche, I., Linsenmair, K. E., & Pröhl, H. (2012). Intrasexual competition, territoriality and acoustic communication in male strawberry poison frogs (Oophaga pumilio). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66(5), 613–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1309-9 Narins, P. M., Hödl, W., & Grabul, D. S. (2003). Bimodal signal requisite for agonistic behavior in a dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(2), 577–580. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0237165100 Owen, P. C., & Perrill, S. A. (1998). Habituation in the green frog, Rana clamitans. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 44(3), 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050533 Pettitt, B. A., Bourne, G. R., & Bee, M. A. (2013). Advertisement call variation in the golden rocket frog (Anomaloglossus beebei): evidence for individual distinctiveness. Ethology, 119(3), 244256. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12058 Posso-Terranova, A., & Andrés, J. (2018). Multivariate species boundaries and conservation of harlequin poison frogs. Molecular Ecology, 27, 3432–3451. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14803 Pröhl, H. (2005). Territorial behavior in dendrobatid frogs. Journal of Herpetology, 39(3), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1670/162-04A.1 Pröhl, H., & Berke, O. (2001). Spatial distributions of male and female strawberry poison frogs and their relation to female reproductive resources. Oecologia, 129, 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100751 Pröhl, H., & Hödl, W. (1999). Parental investment, potential reproductive rates, and mating system in the strawberry dart-poison frog, Dendrobates pumilio. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46, 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050612 Pröhl, H., & Willink, B. (2015). Ecología y comportamiento de las ranas venenosas del género Oophaga en Costa Rica y Panamá. Alytes, 32(1–4), 31–45. Protti, S. F., García-Rodríguez, A., Barrantes, G., & Sandoval, L. (2023). Does variation in call rate affect the response of territorial males in the Strawberry Poison Frog (Oophaga pumilio)? Ichthyology & Herpetology, 111(2), 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1643/h2021052 RStudio Team (2022). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R (Version 4.2.1) [software]. http://www.rstudio.com/ Restrepo, M. M. G., Rivera, J. L. J., Marín, E. R., Salazar, M. J. M., Jaramillo, C. F. R., Klinger, W. B., Ramirez, G. M., Mosquera, M. B., Lozano, L. A. M., Mosquera, J. P., Mosquera, S. Y. R., Mosquera, R. M., Perea, M. M., Moreno, H. L. M., Bonilla, N. S., Quinto, O. M., Palacios, E. T., Cárdenas, B. A., Rentería, C. B. M… Montoya, W. C. (2019). Tomo I: Alianzas estratégicas para el conocimiento y conservación de la riqueza cultural y biológica en los territorios étnicos del Alto San Juan. Tomo II: Territorios colectivos de las comunidades negras del Alto San Juan: Riqueza Cultural y Biológica en el Chocó Biogeográfico Risaraldense. M. Mosquera Blandón (Comp.), E. Marin Rios (Rev). Corporación Autónoma Regional de Risaralda (CARDER) & Instituto de Investigaciones Ambientales del Pacífico (IIAP). Roithmair, M. E. (1992). Territoriality and male mating success in the dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae, Anura). Ethology, 92(4), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439–0310.1992.tb00970.x Roithmair, M. E. (2010). Territoriality and male mating success in the Dart-poison Frog, Epipedobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae, Anura). Ethology, 92(4), 331–343. Rojas, B., & Pašukonis, A. (2019). From habitat use to social behavior: natural history of a voiceless poison frog, Dendrobates tinctorius. PeerJ, 7, e7648. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7648 Sánchez-Barrera, F. H., Nadachowski, E., Bedoya, M., & Valencia, M. Y. (2012). Plan de manejo de los recursos naturales del territorio colectivo de las comunidades afro de Santa Cecilia, Pueblo Rico, Risaralda – Colombia. Corporación Autónoma Regional de Risaralda (CARDER). Staudt, K., Ospina, S., Mebs, D., & Pröhl, H. (2010). Foraging behaviour and territoriality of the strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio) in dependence of the presence of ants. AmphibiaReptilia, 31, 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853810791069100 Summers, K., & Tumulty, J. (2014). Parental care, sexual selection, and mating systems in Neotropical poison frogs. In T. Kappeler (Ed.), Sexual selection in primates: New insights and directions (pp. 289–320). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978–0-12–4160286.00011–6 Temeles, E. J. (1994). The role of neighbours in territorial systems: when are they ‘dear enemies’? Animal Behaviour, 47(2), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1994.1047 Tibbetts, E. A., & Dale, J. (2007). Individual recognition: it is good to be different. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22(10), 529–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.001 Tumulty, J. P. (2018). Dear enemy effect. En J. Vonk & T. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of animal cognition and behavior (pp. 1–4). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-319–478296_693–1 Tumulty, J. & Bee, M. (2021). Ecological and social drivers of neighbor recognition and the dear enemy effect in a poison frog. Behavioral Ecology, 32(1), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/araa113 Tumulty, J. P., Fouilloux, C. A., Vallejos, J. G., & Bee, M. A. (2022). Predicting and measuring decision rules for social recognition in a Neotropical frog. The American Naturalist, 200(2), 7792. https://doi.org/10.1086/720279 Tumulty, J. P., Pašukonis, A., Ringler, M., Forester, J. D., Hödl, W., & Bee, M. A. (2018). Brilliantthighed poison frogs do not use acoustic identity information to treat territorial neighbours as dear enemies. Animal Behaviour, 141, 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.05.008 Vaira, M., Corbalán, V., Quiroga, L., & Sanabria, E. (2021). Identificación y marcado de individuos. En L. Pereyra, E. Etchepare, & M. Vaira (Eds.), Manual de técnicas y protocolos para el relevamiento y estudio de anfibios de Argentina (pp.89–93). Ediunju. Vázquez, J., Fargallo, J. A., Jiménez, N., Aguilar-Montiel, F., & Rodríguez-Martínez, L. (2020). Dear enemy effect in the Mexican volcano mouse Neotomodon alstoni: Implications of sex in the agonistic behaviour among neighbours. Behavioural Processes, 181, 104251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104251 Vélez, A., & Guajardo, A. S. (2021). Individual variation in two types of advertisement calls of Pacific tree frogs, Hyliola (=Pseudacris) regilla, and the implications for sexual selection and species recognition. Bioacoustics, 30(4), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2020.1803133 Wells, K. D. (1977a). The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Animal Behaviour, 25(321), 666693. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003–3472(77)90118-X Wells, K. D. (1977b). Territoriality and male mating success in the Green Frog (Rana clamitans). Ecology, 58(4), 750–762. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936211 Wells, K. D. (1980a). Behavioral ecology and social organization of a dendrobatid frog (Colostethus inguinalis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 6(3), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00569201 Wells, K. D. (1980b). Social behavior and communication of a dendrobatid frog (Colostethus trinitatis). Herpetologica, 36(2), 189–199. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3891485 Wells, K. D. (2007). Mating systems and sexual selection in anurans. En The ecology and behavior of (pp. 338–402). The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226893334.001.0001 Werba, J. A., Stuckert, A. M., Edwards, M., & McCoy, M. W. (2022). Stranger danger: A metaanalysis of the dear enemy hypothesis. Behavioural Processes, 194, 104542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2021.104542 Wiedebusch, M. L. M. (2023). Proceso de cortejo de los machos de Oophaga sylvatica (Anura: Dendrobatidae) en la población del Bosque La Esperanza, Manabí, Ecuador [Tesis de biología]. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Wilson, E. O. (1970). Competitive and aggressive behavior. Social Science Information, 9(6), 123154. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847000900607 Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Ziegler, L., Arim, M., & Bozinovic, F. (2016). Intraspecific scaling in frog calls: The interplay of temperature, body size and metabolic condition. Oecologia, 181(3), 673–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3499-8
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv	37 páginas application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Caldas Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales Manizales, Caldas Biología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Caldas Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales Manizales, Caldas Biología
institution	Universidad de Caldas
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_	1855532541264527360
spelling	¿Vecino o desconocido? Ausencia de discriminación vocal en la rana arlequín venenosa Oophaga histrionica (Anura: Dendrobatidae)570 - BiologíaComunicación acústicaDiscriminación individualFirmas vocalesQuerido enemigoTerritorialidadAcoustic communicationDear enemyIndividual discriminationTerritorialityVocal signaturesEcología animalEtologíaComportamiento animalIlustraciones, tablas.Los machos territoriales típicamente son más agresivos hacia conespecíficos desconocidos que hacia sus vecinos. Este comportamiento, conocido como el “querido enemigo”. En anuros esto ha sido poco evaluado, pese a la existencia de sistemas sociales territoriales y de llamadas individualmente distintivas. Este estudio evaluó la variación individual de las vocalizaciones de los machos de Oophaga histrionica, con el fin de determinar si los machos en su territorio respondían más agresivamente hacia machos desconocidos respecto a los vecinos. Los resultados muestran que los machos mantienen territorios estables durante al menos dos meses y que algunas propiedades espectrales y temporales de sus llamadas son individualmente distintivas. Sin embargo, no se evidenció un patrón consistente de discriminación entre vecinos y desconocidos, lo que sugiere que la discriminación individual podría depender de múltiples modalidades de comunicación, del comportamiento reproductivo o del tipo de recurso defendido. Estos hallazgos aportan información sobre la ecología y el comportamiento territorial de O. histrionica y contribuyen a comprender los mecanismos de señalización acústica en dendrobátidos.Territorial males typically exhibit stronger aggression toward unfamiliar conspecifics than toward neighbors, a pattern known as the “dear enemy” phenomenon. In anurans, this behavior has been rarely evaluated despite their territorial social systems and individually distinctive calls. This study examined individual variation in the vocalizations of male Oophaga histrionica to assess whether males responded more aggressively to unfamiliar intruders than to neighbors. Results indicate that males maintain stable territories for at least two months and that several spectral and temporal call properties are individually distinctive. However, no consistent discrimination between neighbors and strangers was detected, suggesting that individual recognition may depend on additional communication modalities, reproductive behavior, or the type of defended resource. These findings provide new insights into the ecology and territorial behavior of O. histrionica and contribute to understanding acoustic signaling mechanisms in dendrobatid frogs.Introducción -- Materiales y métodos -- Área de estudio -- Muestreo -- Identificación individual -- Delimitación del territorio -- Grabación de las vocalizaciones -- Variación individual de las vocalizaciones -- Playback vecinos y desconocidos -- Resultados -- Delimitación del territorio -- Variación individual de las vocalizaciones -- Playback vecinos y desconocidos -- Discusión -- Referencias -- AnexosPregradoBiólogo(a)Etología y comunicación de anfibiosUniversidad de CaldasFacultad de Ciencias Exactas y NaturalesManizales, CaldasBiologíaGutiérrez-Cárdenas, Paul David AlfonsoUniversidad de CaldasGrupo de Ecología y Diversidad de Anfibios y Reptiles (Categoría B)Aristizabal Ortiz, Mariana2025-11-20T15:19:15Z2025-11-20T15:19:15Z2025-11-19Trabajo de grado - Pregradohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1fTextinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis37 páginasapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/26259Universidad de CaldasRepositorio Institucional Universidad de Caldasrepositorio.ucaldas.edu.cospaAudacity Team. (2023). Audacity (Version 3.7) [software]. https://www.audacityteam.org/Baca, G. X. (2024). Manual de Audacity [manual de usuario]. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. https://manual-audacity.recursos.uoc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Manual-de-Audacity.pdfBee, M. A. (2003). A test of the "dear enemy effect" in the strawberry dart-poison frog (Dendrobates pumilio). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 54, 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265003–0657–5Bee, M. A. (2016). Social recognition in anurans. En M. A. Bee & C. T. Miller (Eds.), Psychological mechanisms in animal communication (Vol. 5, pp. 169–198). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-319–48690–1_7Bee, M. A., Cook, J. M., Love, E. K., O'Bryan, L. R., Pettitt, B. A., Schrode, K., & Vélez, A. (2010). Assessing acoustic signal variability and the potential for sexual selection and social recognition in boreal chorus frogs (Pseudacris maculata). Ethology, 116(6), 564–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439–0310.2010.01773.xBee, M. A., & Gerhardt, H. C. (2001). Neighbour-stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana): I. Acoustic basis. Animal Behaviour, 62(6), 1129–1140. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1851Bee, M. A., & Gerhardt, H. C. (2002). Individual voice recognition in a territorial frog (Rana catesbeiana). Proceedings: Biological Sciences, 269(1499), 1443–1448. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2041Bee, M. A., Kozich, C. E., Blackwell, K. J. and Gerhardt, H. C. (2001), Individual variation in advertisement calls of territorial male Green Frogs, Rana clamitans: Implications for individual discrimination. Ethology, 107,65–84. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439–0310.2001.00640.xBee, M. A., Reichert, M. S., & Tumulty, J. (2016). Assessment and recognition of rivals in anuran contests. En Advances in the Study of Behavior (pp. 161–249). Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.asb.2016.01.001Beecher, M. D. (1989). Signalling systems for individual recognition: An information theory approach. Animal Behaviour, 38(2), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003–3472(89)80087–9Betancourth-Cundar, M., & Palacios-Rodriguez, P. (2022). Reproductive behaviors promote ecological and phenotypic sexual differentiation in the critically endangered lehmann’s poison frog. Evolutionary Ecology, 36(6), 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-022-10207-3Betancourth-Cundar, M., Amézquita, A., & Cadena, C. D. (2024a). Novel and classical methods similarly describe variation in territory size among males in neotropical poison frogs with contrasting reproductive and behavioral strategies. Evolutionary Ecology, 38(5), 799–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-024-10309-0Betancourth-Cundar, M., Canoine, V., Fusani, L., & Cadena, C. D. (2024b). Does testosterone underlie the interplay between male traits and territorial behavior in neotropical poison frogs? Hormones and Behavior, 162, 105547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2024.105547Bourne, G., Collins, C., Holder, A., & McCarthy, C. (2001). Vocal communication and reproductive behavior of the frog Colostethus beebei in Guyana. Journal of Herpetology, 35(2), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.2307/1566118Bradbury, J. W., & Vehrencamp, S. L. (2011). Principles of animal communication (2nd ed.). Sinauer Associates.Bunnell, P. (1973). Vocalizations in the territorial behavior of the frog Dendrobates pumilio. Copeia, 1973(2), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.2307/1442966Christensen, C., & Radford, A. N. (2018). Dear enemies or nasty neighbors? Causes and consequences of variation in the responses of group-living species to territorial intrusions. Behavioral Ecology, 29(5), 1004–1013. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary010Chuang, M. F. (2006). Overwintering tadpoles of Rana adenopleura in a subtropical lowland of Taiwan (Tesis de maestría). National Changhua University of Education.Chuang, M. F., Bee, M. A., & Kam, Y. C. (2013). Short amplexus duration in a territorial anuran: a possible adaptation in response to male-male competition. PLoS ONE, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083116Chuang, M. F., Kam, Y.-C., & Bee, M. A. (2017). Territorial olive frogs display lower aggression towards neighbours than strangers based on individual vocal signatures. Animal Behaviour, 123, 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.11.001Colombia en Mapas (2020). Parques Nacionales Naturales PNN. https://www.colombiaenmapas.gov.co/?e=-76.23929544372373,5.046566134843802,75.49085184020782,5.533373985795281,4686&b=igac&l=178&u=0&t=2&servicio=62Crothers, L. R., & Cummings, M. E. (2015). A multifunctional warning signal behaves as an agonistic status signal in a poison frog. Behavioral Ecology, 26(2), 560–568. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru231Crump, M. L. (1972). Territoriality and mating behavior in Dendrobates gerus (Anura: Dendrobatidae). Herpetologica, 28(3), 195–198. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3890619Davis, M. S. (1987). Acoustically mediated neighbor recognition in the North American bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 21(3), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303209Duellman, W. E. (1992). Reproductive strategies of frogs. Scientific American, 267(1), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0792–80Dyson, M. L., Reichert, M. S., & Halliday, T. R. (2013). Contests in amphibians. En I. C. W. Hardy & M. Briffa (Eds.), Animal contests (pp. 228–257). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051248Equipo de desarrollo de QGIS. (2024). Sistema de información geográfica de QGIS: guía de usuario. Proyecto de la Fundación Geoespacial de código abierto. https://docs.qgis.org/3.34/es/docs/user_manual/index.html#qgis-user-guideFeng, A. S., Arch, V. S., Yu, Z., Yu, X.-J., Xu, Z.-M. & Shen, J.-X. (2009). Neighbor–stranger discrimination in concave-eared torrent frogs, Odorrana tormota. Ethology, 115, 851–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439–0310.2009.01666.xFisher, J. (1954). Evolution and bird sociality. En J. Huxley, A. C. Hardy & E. B. Ford (Eds.), Evolution as a process (pp. 71–82). George Allen & Unwin. https://wellcomecollection.org/works/vf9q9akqFogo, B. R., Sanches, F. H., & Costa, T. M. (2019). Testing the dear enemy relationship in fiddler crabs: is there a difference between fighting conspecific and heterospecific opponents? Behavioural Processes, 162, 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2019.02.001Fouilloux, C. A., Goyes Vallejos, J. & Tumulty, J. P. (2024). Home is where the high-quality resources are: nursery characteristics and territory distribution suggest reproductive resource defense in golden rocket frogs. Evolutionary Ecology, 38, 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-023-10273-1Gardner, E. A., & Graves, B. M. (2005). Responses of resident male Dendrobates pumilio to territory intruders. Journal of Herpetology, 39(2), 248–253. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4092899Garrido-Priego, M., Tószeghi, M., Angiolani-Larrea, F. N., Valencia-Aguilar, A., Bégué, L., Núñez, R., Culebras, J., Ringler, M., Stynoski, J. L., & Ringler, E. (2024). Clutch attendance and call parameters are linked to mating success in a glassfrog with paternal care. Behavioral Ecology, 35(6), arae078. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arae078Gerhardt, H. C. (1991). Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Animal Behaviour, 42(4), 615–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003–3472(05)80245–3Gerhardt, H. C., & Bee, M. A. (2007). Recognition and localization of acoustic signals. En P. M. Narins, A. S. Feng, R. R. Fay, & A. N. Popper (Eds.), Hearing and sound communication in amphibians (Vol. 28, pp. 113–146). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-47796-1_5Gerhardt, H. C., & Huber, F. (2002). Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: Common problems and diverse solutions. University of Chicago Press.Getty, T. (1987). Dear enemies and the prisoner's dilemma: why should territorial neighbors form defensive coalitions? American Zoologist, 27(2), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/27.2.327Gil-Guevara, O., & Amézquita, A. (2020). Adjusted phonotactic reactions to sound amplitude and pulse number mediate territoriality in the harlequin poison frog. Behavioural Processes, 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104249Giraldo, A., Nadachowski, E., & Camargo, C. J. (1998). Diagnostico ambiental de comunidades negras del Alto San Juan. Corporación Autónoma Regional de Risaralda (CARDER)Gómez, C. J., & Amézquita, A. (2024). Ecological and behavioral correlates of homing performance in the egg-feeding poison frog Oophaga histrionica. Evolutionary Ecology, 38, 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682–023–10283-zGonzález, C. G., Lise, A. V., & Felpeto, A. B. (2013). Tratamiento de datos con R, Statistica y SPSS. Ediciones Díaz de Santos.Grant, T., Frost, D. R., Caldwell, J. P., Gagliardo, R., Haddad, C. F. B., Kok, P. J. R., Means, D. B., Noonan, B. P., Schargel, W. E., & Wheeler, W. C. (2006). Phylogenetic systematics of dartpoison frogs and their relatives (Amphibia: Athesphatanura: Dendrobatidae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 2006(299), 1–262. https://doi.org/10.1206/00030090(2006)299[1:SPOTDP]2.0.CO;2Gingras, B., Boeckle, M., Herbst, C. T., & Fitch, W. T. (2013). Call acoustics reflect body size across four clades of anurans. Journal of Zoology, 289(1), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14697998.2012.00973.xHödl, W., & Amézquita, A. (2001). Visual signaling in anuran amphibians. En M. J. Ryan (Ed.), Anuran communication (pp. 121–141). Smithsonian Institution Press.Holdridge, L. R. (1996). Ecología basada en zonas de vida. Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura, San José, Costa Rica. 216 pp.Howard, R. D. (1978). The evolution of mating strategies in bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana. Evolution, 32(4), 850–871. https://doi.org/10.2307/2407499Husak, J. F., & Fox, S. F. (2003). Adult male collared lizards, Crotaphytus collaris, increase aggression towards displaced neighbours. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.2058Jin, L., Liang, J., Fan, Q., Yu, J., Sun, K., & Wang, H. (2020). Male Great Tits (Parus major) adjust dear enemy effect expression in different breeding stages. Journal of Ornithology, 162(1), 221229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336–020–01815–3Jouventin, P., Aubin, T., & Lengagne, T. (1999). Finding a parent in a king penguin colony: the acoustic system of individual recognition. Animal Behaviour. 57, 1175–1183. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1086Jungfer K. H., Weygoldt, P., & Juraske, N. (1996). Dendrobates vicentei, ein neuer pfeilgiftfrosch aus zentral-Panama. Herpetofauna, 18(103), 17–26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317170638K. Lisa Yang Center for Conservation Bioacoustics at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology. (2024). Raven Pro: Interactive Sound Analysis Software (Version 1.6.5) [software]. Ithaca, NY: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Disponible en https://www.ravensoundsoftware.com/Kinsler, L. E., Frey, A. R., Coppens, A. B., & Sanders, J. V. (2000). Fundamentals of acoustics (4th ed.). Wiley.Keppel, G. & Wickens T. D. (1991). Design and analysis: a researcher’s handbook (4th ed.). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.Köhler, J., Jansen, M., Rodríguez, A., Kok, P., Toledo, L. F., Emmrich, M., Glaw, F., Haddad, C., Rödel, M. O., & Vences, M. (2017). The use of bioacoustics in anuran taxonomy: theory, terminology, methods and recommendations for best practice. Zootaxa, 4251(1), 1–124. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4251.1.1Kroodsma, D. E. (1989a). Inappropriate experimental designs impede progress in bioacoustic research: A reply. Animal Behaviour, 38(4), 717–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/S00033472(89)80020-XKroodsma, D. E. (1989b). Suggested experimental designs for song playbacks. Animal Behaviour, 37(4), 600–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003–3472(89)90039–0Lesbarrères, D., & Lodé, T. (2002). Variations in male calls and responses to an unfamiliar advertisement call in a territorial breeding anuran, Rana dalmatina: evidence for a “dear enemy” effect. Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 14(4), 287–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2002.9522731Limerick, S. (1980). Courtship behavior and oviposition of the poison-arrow frog Dendrobates pumilio. Herpetologica, 36(1), 69–71. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3891857Lodé, T., & Lesbarrères, D. (2004). Multiple paternity in Rana dalmatina, a monogamous territorial breeding anuran. The Science of Nature, 91(1), 44–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114–003–0491–7Martin, W. F. (1972). Evolution of vocalization in the genus Bufo. En W. F. Blair (Ed.), Evolution in the genus Bufo (pp. 279-309). University of Texas Press.McVey, M. E., Zahary, R. G., Perry, D., & MacDougal, J. (1981). Territoriality and homing behavior in dart frog (Dendrobates pumilio). Copeia, 1981(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2307/1444035Meuche, I., Brusa, O., Linsenmair, K. E., & Pröhl, H. (2013). Only distance matters – non-choosy females in a poison frog population. Frontiers in Zoology, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-999410-29Meuche, I., Linsenmair, K. E., & Pröhl, H. (2011). Female territoriality in the strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio). Copeia, 2011(3), 351–356. https://doi.org/10.1643/CE-08-135Meuche, I., Linsenmair, K. E., & Pröhl, H. (2012). Intrasexual competition, territoriality and acoustic communication in male strawberry poison frogs (Oophaga pumilio). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66(5), 613–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1309-9Narins, P. M., Hödl, W., & Grabul, D. S. (2003). Bimodal signal requisite for agonistic behavior in a dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(2), 577–580. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0237165100Owen, P. C., & Perrill, S. A. (1998). Habituation in the green frog, Rana clamitans. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 44(3), 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050533Pettitt, B. A., Bourne, G. R., & Bee, M. A. (2013). Advertisement call variation in the golden rocket frog (Anomaloglossus beebei): evidence for individual distinctiveness. Ethology, 119(3), 244256. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12058Posso-Terranova, A., & Andrés, J. (2018). Multivariate species boundaries and conservation of harlequin poison frogs. Molecular Ecology, 27, 3432–3451. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14803Pröhl, H. (2005). Territorial behavior in dendrobatid frogs. Journal of Herpetology, 39(3), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1670/162-04A.1Pröhl, H., & Berke, O. (2001). Spatial distributions of male and female strawberry poison frogs and their relation to female reproductive resources. Oecologia, 129, 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100751Pröhl, H., & Hödl, W. (1999). Parental investment, potential reproductive rates, and mating system in the strawberry dart-poison frog, Dendrobates pumilio. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46, 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050612Pröhl, H., & Willink, B. (2015). Ecología y comportamiento de las ranas venenosas del género Oophaga en Costa Rica y Panamá. Alytes, 32(1–4), 31–45.Protti, S. F., García-Rodríguez, A., Barrantes, G., & Sandoval, L. (2023). Does variation in call rate affect the response of territorial males in the Strawberry Poison Frog (Oophaga pumilio)? Ichthyology & Herpetology, 111(2), 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1643/h2021052RStudio Team (2022). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R (Version 4.2.1) [software]. http://www.rstudio.com/Restrepo, M. M. G., Rivera, J. L. J., Marín, E. R., Salazar, M. J. M., Jaramillo, C. F. R., Klinger, W. B., Ramirez, G. M., Mosquera, M. B., Lozano, L. A. M., Mosquera, J. P., Mosquera, S. Y. R., Mosquera, R. M., Perea, M. M., Moreno, H. L. M., Bonilla, N. S., Quinto, O. M., Palacios, E. T., Cárdenas, B. A., Rentería, C. B. M… Montoya, W. C. (2019). Tomo I: Alianzas estratégicas para el conocimiento y conservación de la riqueza cultural y biológica en los territorios étnicos del Alto San Juan. Tomo II: Territorios colectivos de las comunidades negras del Alto San Juan: Riqueza Cultural y Biológica en el Chocó Biogeográfico Risaraldense. M. Mosquera Blandón (Comp.), E. Marin Rios (Rev). Corporación Autónoma Regional de Risaralda (CARDER) & Instituto de Investigaciones Ambientales del Pacífico (IIAP).Roithmair, M. E. (1992). Territoriality and male mating success in the dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae, Anura). Ethology, 92(4), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439–0310.1992.tb00970.xRoithmair, M. E. (2010). Territoriality and male mating success in the Dart-poison Frog, Epipedobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae, Anura). Ethology, 92(4), 331–343.Rojas, B., & Pašukonis, A. (2019). From habitat use to social behavior: natural history of a voiceless poison frog, Dendrobates tinctorius. PeerJ, 7, e7648. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7648Sánchez-Barrera, F. H., Nadachowski, E., Bedoya, M., & Valencia, M. Y. (2012). Plan de manejo de los recursos naturales del territorio colectivo de las comunidades afro de Santa Cecilia, Pueblo Rico, Risaralda – Colombia. Corporación Autónoma Regional de Risaralda (CARDER).Staudt, K., Ospina, S., Mebs, D., & Pröhl, H. (2010). Foraging behaviour and territoriality of the strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio) in dependence of the presence of ants. AmphibiaReptilia, 31, 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853810791069100Summers, K., & Tumulty, J. (2014). Parental care, sexual selection, and mating systems in Neotropical poison frogs. In T. Kappeler (Ed.), Sexual selection in primates: New insights and directions (pp. 289–320). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978–0-12–4160286.00011–6Temeles, E. J. (1994). The role of neighbours in territorial systems: when are they ‘dear enemies’? Animal Behaviour, 47(2), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1994.1047Tibbetts, E. A., & Dale, J. (2007). Individual recognition: it is good to be different. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22(10), 529–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.001Tumulty, J. P. (2018). Dear enemy effect. En J. Vonk & T. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of animal cognition and behavior (pp. 1–4). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-319–478296_693–1Tumulty, J. & Bee, M. (2021). Ecological and social drivers of neighbor recognition and the dear enemy effect in a poison frog. Behavioral Ecology, 32(1), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/araa113Tumulty, J. P., Fouilloux, C. A., Vallejos, J. G., & Bee, M. A. (2022). Predicting and measuring decision rules for social recognition in a Neotropical frog. The American Naturalist, 200(2), 7792. https://doi.org/10.1086/720279Tumulty, J. P., Pašukonis, A., Ringler, M., Forester, J. D., Hödl, W., & Bee, M. A. (2018). Brilliantthighed poison frogs do not use acoustic identity information to treat territorial neighbours as dear enemies. Animal Behaviour, 141, 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.05.008Vaira, M., Corbalán, V., Quiroga, L., & Sanabria, E. (2021). Identificación y marcado de individuos. En L. Pereyra, E. Etchepare, & M. Vaira (Eds.), Manual de técnicas y protocolos para el relevamiento y estudio de anfibios de Argentina (pp.89–93). Ediunju.Vázquez, J., Fargallo, J. A., Jiménez, N., Aguilar-Montiel, F., & Rodríguez-Martínez, L. (2020). Dear enemy effect in the Mexican volcano mouse Neotomodon alstoni: Implications of sex in the agonistic behaviour among neighbours. Behavioural Processes, 181, 104251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104251Vélez, A., & Guajardo, A. S. (2021). Individual variation in two types of advertisement calls of Pacific tree frogs, Hyliola (=Pseudacris) regilla, and the implications for sexual selection and species recognition. Bioacoustics, 30(4), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2020.1803133Wells, K. D. (1977a). The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Animal Behaviour, 25(321), 666693. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003–3472(77)90118-XWells, K. D. (1977b). Territoriality and male mating success in the Green Frog (Rana clamitans). Ecology, 58(4), 750–762. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936211Wells, K. D. (1980a). Behavioral ecology and social organization of a dendrobatid frog (Colostethus inguinalis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 6(3), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00569201Wells, K. D. (1980b). Social behavior and communication of a dendrobatid frog (Colostethus trinitatis). Herpetologica, 36(2), 189–199. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3891485Wells, K. D. (2007). Mating systems and sexual selection in anurans. En The ecology and behavior of (pp. 338–402). The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226893334.001.0001Werba, J. A., Stuckert, A. M., Edwards, M., & McCoy, M. W. (2022). Stranger danger: A metaanalysis of the dear enemy hypothesis. Behavioural Processes, 194, 104542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2021.104542Wiedebusch, M. L. M. (2023). Proceso de cortejo de los machos de Oophaga sylvatica (Anura: Dendrobatidae) en la población del Bosque La Esperanza, Manabí, Ecuador [Tesis de biología]. Pontificia Universidad Católica del EcuadorWilson, E. O. (1970). Competitive and aggressive behavior. Social Science Information, 9(6), 123154. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847000900607Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Ziegler, L., Arim, M., & Bozinovic, F. (2016). Intraspecific scaling in frog calls: The interplay of temperature, body size and metabolic condition. Oecologia, 181(3), 673–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3499-8https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/262592025-11-21T08:01:13Z

¿Vecino o desconocido? Ausencia de discriminación vocal en la rana arlequín venenosa Oophaga histrionica (Anura: Dendrobatidae)

Publicaciones similares