Sistemas conversacionales: entre la privacidad y la funcionalidad de las interacciones

La tecnología ha viabilizado todo tipo de cambios en la sociedad, uno de los más trascendentes se refleja en la forma en la cual nos relacionamos con nuestro entorno. Es así como los sistemas conversacionales posibilitan diversos tipos de interacciones de manera sencilla y permanente, al tiempo que...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2023
Institución:
Universidad de Caldas
Repositorio:
Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
Idioma:
spa
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/24393
Acceso en línea:
https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/24393
https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2023.20.2.12
Palabra clave:
Sistemas conversacionales
inteligencia artificial
privacidad
datos personales
Conversational systems
Artificial Intelligence
privacy
personal data
Rights
openAccess
License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
id REPOUCALDA_2bde12d6a9a678e0fbd1e18ff1730cd7
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/24393
network_acronym_str REPOUCALDA
network_name_str Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sistemas conversacionales: entre la privacidad y la funcionalidad de las interacciones
Conversational Systems: between privacy and functionality
title Sistemas conversacionales: entre la privacidad y la funcionalidad de las interacciones
spellingShingle Sistemas conversacionales: entre la privacidad y la funcionalidad de las interacciones
Sistemas conversacionales
inteligencia artificial
privacidad
datos personales
Conversational systems
Artificial Intelligence
privacy
personal data
title_short Sistemas conversacionales: entre la privacidad y la funcionalidad de las interacciones
title_full Sistemas conversacionales: entre la privacidad y la funcionalidad de las interacciones
title_fullStr Sistemas conversacionales: entre la privacidad y la funcionalidad de las interacciones
title_full_unstemmed Sistemas conversacionales: entre la privacidad y la funcionalidad de las interacciones
title_sort Sistemas conversacionales: entre la privacidad y la funcionalidad de las interacciones
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Sistemas conversacionales
inteligencia artificial
privacidad
datos personales
Conversational systems
Artificial Intelligence
privacy
personal data
topic Sistemas conversacionales
inteligencia artificial
privacidad
datos personales
Conversational systems
Artificial Intelligence
privacy
personal data
description La tecnología ha viabilizado todo tipo de cambios en la sociedad, uno de los más trascendentes se refleja en la forma en la cual nos relacionamos con nuestro entorno. Es así como los sistemas conversacionales posibilitan diversos tipos de interacciones de manera sencilla y permanente, al tiempo que su impacto se vuelve escalonado acorde a sus potencialidades y funcionalidades dentro de los entornos en los cuales se encuentran incorporados. En este sentido, mediante la simulación de características específicas humanas estos sistemas intervienen sin mayor problema en el desarrollo de una conversación, con lo que generan una actitud de mayor o menor confianza ante sus respuestas, las mismas que conducirán a la toma de ciertas decisiones por parte de las personas; y, al ser entidades diseñadas, pueden adoptar las “formas” y “actitudes” que nosotros decidamos basados en la información que le suministremos, por lo que diversos aspectos en torno a la privacidad del usuario se encuentran seriamente comprometidos. Indiscutiblemente el rápido desarrollo e interés por introducir los sistemas conversacionales en todas las actividades de nuestra vida cotidiana consolida la premisa de que cuanto más generalizado sea su uso, mayor será la cantidad de datos personales que estarán a disposición de terceros; y, en consecuencia, diversas consideraciones en torno a la privacidad deben ser replanteadas.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-01T00:00:00Z
2023-07-01T00:00:00Z
2023-07-01
2025-10-08T21:32:00Z
2025-10-08T21:32:00Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Artículo de revista
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Text
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Journal article
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv 1794-2918
https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/24393
10.17151/jurid.2023.20.2.12
2590-8928
https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2023.20.2.12
identifier_str_mv 1794-2918
10.17151/jurid.2023.20.2.12
2590-8928
url https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/24393
https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2023.20.2.12
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 242
2
225
20
Jurídicas
Adam, M., Wessel, M., & Benlian, A. (2020). AI-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance. Electronic Markets, 31(2), 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00414-7
Baez, M., Daniel, F., & Casati, F. (2020). Conversational Web Interaction: Proposal of a Dialog-Based Natural Language Interaction Paradigm for the Web. In A. Følstad, T. Araujo, S. Papadopoulos, E.
Lai-Chong Law, O. Granmo, E. Luger & P. Brandtzaeg (Eds.), Chatbot Research and Design: Third International Workshop (pp. 94-110). Springer.
Bailenson, J. N., & Blascovich, J. (2004). Avatars. In W. S. Bainbridge (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human–computer interaction (pp. 64-68). Berkshire Publishing Group.
Bélanger, F., & Crossler, R. E. (2011). Privacy in the digital age: A Review of Information privacy research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 35(4). https://www.jstor.org/stable/41409971
Buchanan, T., Paine, C., Joinson, A., & Reips, U. (2007). Development of measures of online privacy concern and protection for use on the Internet. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20459
Burgoon, J. (1982). Privacy and Communication. Annals of the International Communication Association, 6(1), 206-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1982.11678499
Cassell, J. (2001). Embodied Conversational Agent: Representation and Intelligence in User Interfaces. AI Magazine. 22, 4: 67-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v22i4.1593
Chaves, A., & Gerosa, M. (2020). How should my chatbot interact? A survey on human-chatbot interaction design. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(8), 729-758. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1841438
Crolic, C., Thomaz, F., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2021). Blame the Bot: Anthropomorphism and Anger in Customer–Chatbot Interactions. Journal of Marketing, 86(1), 132-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429211045687
Dale, R. (2016). Industry Watch: The return of the chatbots. Natural Language Engineering, 22(5), 811-817. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324916000243
Ford, J., Chance, E., Haynes, K. & Rajpurohit, D. (2012). Embodied Conversational Agent Avatars in Virtual Worlds: Making today’s immersive environments more responsive to participants. In P.Hingston (Ed.), Believable Bots: Can Computers Play Like People? (pp. 99-118). Springer.
Guzman, A. L. (2019). Voices in and of the machine: Source orientation toward mobile virtual assistants.Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 343-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.009
Hasal, M., Nowaková, J., Ahmed, K., Abdulla, H., Snášel, V. y Ogiela, L. (2021). Chatbots: Security, privacy, data protection, and social aspects. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 33(19). 10.1002/cpe.6426
Holak, B. (16 de marzo de 2018). ¿Quién habla? Agente conversacional vs chatbot vs asistente virtual. Techtarget. https://www.computerweekly.com/es/cronica/Quien-habla-Agente-conversacional-vschatbot-vs-asistente-virtual
Lee, S. & Choi, J. (2017). Enhancing user experience with conversational agent for movie recommendation: Effects of self-disclosure and reciprocity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 103, 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.02.005
Luger, E. & Sellen, A. (2016). Like having a really Bad PA: The Gulf between User Expectation and Experience of Conversational Agents. CHI ‘16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 5286-5297. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858288
Malhotra, N., Kim, S. & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model. Information systems research, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0032
McAllister, P., Kerr, J., McTear, M., Mulvenna, M., Bond, R., Kirby, K., Morning, J. & Glover, D. (2020). Towards Chatbots to Support Bibliotherapy Preparation and Delivery. In A. Følstad, T. Araujo, S.Papadopoulos, E. Lai-Chong Law, O. Granmo, E. Luger % P. Brandtzaeg (Eds.), Chatbot Research and Design: Third International Workshop (pp. 127-142). Springer.
Nass, C. & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153
Nissenbaum, H. (2004). Privacy as Contextual Integrity. Washington Law Review, 79(1), 119-157. https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4450&context=wlr
Neururer, M., Schögl, S., Brinkschulte, L. & Groth, A. (2018). Perceptions on Authenticity in Chat Bots. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2030060
Nordberg, O., Dugstad, J., Sektnan, E., Flobak, E., Nordgreen, T., Kumar, S. y Guribye, F. (2020). Designing Chatbots for Guiding Online Peer Support Conversations for Adults with ADHD. In A.
Følstad, T. Araujo, S. Papadopoulos, E. Lai-Chong Law, O. Granmo, E. Luger & P. Brandtzaeg (Eds.), Chatbot Research and Design: Third International Workshop (pp. 113-126). Springer.
Pulman, S., Boye, J., Cavazza, M., Smith, C. & de La Cámara, R. (2010). How was your day? Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Companionable Dialogue Systems ACL, 37-42. https://aclanthology.org/W10-2707.pdf
Rouvroy, A. (2008). Privacy, data protection, and the unprecedented challenges of ambient intelligence.Studies in ethics, law, and technology, 2(1), 1-51. https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1001
Sağlam, R., & Nurse, J. (2020). Is your chatbot GDPR compliant? Open issues in agent design.Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (pp. 1-3). https://doi.org/10.1145/3405755.3406131
Satzger, B., Endres, M. & Kießling, W. (2006). A Preference-Based Recommender System. In K.Bauknecht, B. Pröll & H. Werthner (Eds.), E-Commerce and Web Technologies: 7th International Conference (pp. 31-40). Springer.
Shechtman, N., & Horowitz, L. (2003). Media inequality in conversation: how people behave differently when interacting with computers and people. CHI ‘03: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 281-288). https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642661
Skinner, G., Han, S., & Chang, E. (2006). An information privacy taxonomy for collaborative environments. Information management & computer security, 14(4), 382-394.
Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., & Burke, S. J. (1996). Information privacy: Measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices. MIS quarterly, 167-196.
Solove, D. J. (2006). A Taxonomy of Privacy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 154(3), 477-564. https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/pnlr154&section=20
Solvan. (12 de marzo de 2018). Chatbot, asistente virtual y agente conversacional. Solvan. https://solvanweb.com.mx/chatbot-asistente-virtual-y-agente-conversacional
Väänänen, K., Hiltunen, A., Varsaluoma, J. y Pietilä, I. (2020). CivicBots – Chatbots for Supporting Youth in Societal Participation. In A. Følstad, T. Araujo, S. Papadopoulos, E. Lai-Chong Law, O. Granmo,
E. Luger & P. Brandtzaeg (Eds.), Chatbot Research and Design: Third International Workshop, CONVERSATIONS 2019 Amsterdam (pp. 143-157). Springer.
Von der Pütten, A. M., Krämer, N., Gratch, J., & Kang, S. (2010). It doesn’t matter what you are! Explaining social effects of agents and avatars. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.012
Warren, S., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4, 193-220. West, M., Kraut, R., & Chew, H. (2019). I’d blush if I could: closing gender divides in digital skills through education. UNESCO.
Wilks, Y. (2010). Is a Companion a distinctive kind of relationship with a machine? Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Companionable Dialogue Systems, 13-18. https://aclanthology.org/W10-2703.pdf
Núm. 2 , Año 2023 : Julio-Diciembre
https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/download/9483/7636
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Caldas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Caldas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/view/9483
institution Universidad de Caldas
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1855532623537897472
spelling Sistemas conversacionales: entre la privacidad y la funcionalidad de las interaccionesConversational Systems: between privacy and functionalitySistemas conversacionalesinteligencia artificialprivacidaddatos personalesConversational systemsArtificial Intelligenceprivacypersonal dataLa tecnología ha viabilizado todo tipo de cambios en la sociedad, uno de los más trascendentes se refleja en la forma en la cual nos relacionamos con nuestro entorno. Es así como los sistemas conversacionales posibilitan diversos tipos de interacciones de manera sencilla y permanente, al tiempo que su impacto se vuelve escalonado acorde a sus potencialidades y funcionalidades dentro de los entornos en los cuales se encuentran incorporados. En este sentido, mediante la simulación de características específicas humanas estos sistemas intervienen sin mayor problema en el desarrollo de una conversación, con lo que generan una actitud de mayor o menor confianza ante sus respuestas, las mismas que conducirán a la toma de ciertas decisiones por parte de las personas; y, al ser entidades diseñadas, pueden adoptar las “formas” y “actitudes” que nosotros decidamos basados en la información que le suministremos, por lo que diversos aspectos en torno a la privacidad del usuario se encuentran seriamente comprometidos. Indiscutiblemente el rápido desarrollo e interés por introducir los sistemas conversacionales en todas las actividades de nuestra vida cotidiana consolida la premisa de que cuanto más generalizado sea su uso, mayor será la cantidad de datos personales que estarán a disposición de terceros; y, en consecuencia, diversas consideraciones en torno a la privacidad deben ser replanteadas.Technology has made possible all kinds of changes in society, one of the most important is reflected in the way in which we relate to our environment. Thus, conversational systems enable various types of interactions in a simple and permanent way, while their impact becomes staggered according to their potential and functionalities within the environments in which they are incorporated. In this sense, by simulating specific human characteristics, these systems intervene without major problem in the development of a conversation, thus generating an attitude of greater or lesser confidence in their responses, which will lead to certain decisions being made by people; and being designed entities, they can adopt the “forms” and “attitudes” that we decide based on the information we provide, so that various aspects of user privacy are seriously compromised. Unquestionably the rapid development and interest in introducing conversational systems in all the activities of our daily life consolidates the premise that the more widespread its use, the greater the amount of personal data that will be available to third parties and consequently various considerations about privacy must be rethought.Universidad de Caldas2023-07-01T00:00:00Z2025-10-08T21:32:00Z2023-07-01T00:00:00Z2025-10-08T21:32:00Z2023-07-01Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1application/pdf1794-2918https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/2439310.17151/jurid.2023.20.2.122590-8928https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2023.20.2.12https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/view/9483spa242222520JurídicasAdam, M., Wessel, M., & Benlian, A. (2020). AI-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance. Electronic Markets, 31(2), 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00414-7Baez, M., Daniel, F., & Casati, F. (2020). Conversational Web Interaction: Proposal of a Dialog-Based Natural Language Interaction Paradigm for the Web. In A. Følstad, T. Araujo, S. Papadopoulos, E.Lai-Chong Law, O. Granmo, E. Luger & P. Brandtzaeg (Eds.), Chatbot Research and Design: Third International Workshop (pp. 94-110). Springer.Bailenson, J. N., & Blascovich, J. (2004). Avatars. In W. S. Bainbridge (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human–computer interaction (pp. 64-68). Berkshire Publishing Group.Bélanger, F., & Crossler, R. E. (2011). Privacy in the digital age: A Review of Information privacy research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 35(4). https://www.jstor.org/stable/41409971Buchanan, T., Paine, C., Joinson, A., & Reips, U. (2007). Development of measures of online privacy concern and protection for use on the Internet. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20459Burgoon, J. (1982). Privacy and Communication. Annals of the International Communication Association, 6(1), 206-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1982.11678499Cassell, J. (2001). Embodied Conversational Agent: Representation and Intelligence in User Interfaces. AI Magazine. 22, 4: 67-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v22i4.1593Chaves, A., & Gerosa, M. (2020). How should my chatbot interact? A survey on human-chatbot interaction design. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(8), 729-758. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1841438Crolic, C., Thomaz, F., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2021). Blame the Bot: Anthropomorphism and Anger in Customer–Chatbot Interactions. Journal of Marketing, 86(1), 132-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429211045687Dale, R. (2016). Industry Watch: The return of the chatbots. Natural Language Engineering, 22(5), 811-817. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324916000243Ford, J., Chance, E., Haynes, K. & Rajpurohit, D. (2012). Embodied Conversational Agent Avatars in Virtual Worlds: Making today’s immersive environments more responsive to participants. In P.Hingston (Ed.), Believable Bots: Can Computers Play Like People? (pp. 99-118). Springer.Guzman, A. L. (2019). Voices in and of the machine: Source orientation toward mobile virtual assistants.Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 343-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.009Hasal, M., Nowaková, J., Ahmed, K., Abdulla, H., Snášel, V. y Ogiela, L. (2021). Chatbots: Security, privacy, data protection, and social aspects. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 33(19). 10.1002/cpe.6426Holak, B. (16 de marzo de 2018). ¿Quién habla? Agente conversacional vs chatbot vs asistente virtual. Techtarget. https://www.computerweekly.com/es/cronica/Quien-habla-Agente-conversacional-vschatbot-vs-asistente-virtualLee, S. & Choi, J. (2017). Enhancing user experience with conversational agent for movie recommendation: Effects of self-disclosure and reciprocity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 103, 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.02.005Luger, E. & Sellen, A. (2016). Like having a really Bad PA: The Gulf between User Expectation and Experience of Conversational Agents. CHI ‘16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 5286-5297. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858288Malhotra, N., Kim, S. & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model. Information systems research, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0032McAllister, P., Kerr, J., McTear, M., Mulvenna, M., Bond, R., Kirby, K., Morning, J. & Glover, D. (2020). Towards Chatbots to Support Bibliotherapy Preparation and Delivery. In A. Følstad, T. Araujo, S.Papadopoulos, E. Lai-Chong Law, O. Granmo, E. Luger % P. Brandtzaeg (Eds.), Chatbot Research and Design: Third International Workshop (pp. 127-142). Springer.Nass, C. & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153Nissenbaum, H. (2004). Privacy as Contextual Integrity. Washington Law Review, 79(1), 119-157. https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4450&context=wlrNeururer, M., Schögl, S., Brinkschulte, L. & Groth, A. (2018). Perceptions on Authenticity in Chat Bots. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2030060Nordberg, O., Dugstad, J., Sektnan, E., Flobak, E., Nordgreen, T., Kumar, S. y Guribye, F. (2020). Designing Chatbots for Guiding Online Peer Support Conversations for Adults with ADHD. In A.Følstad, T. Araujo, S. Papadopoulos, E. Lai-Chong Law, O. Granmo, E. Luger & P. Brandtzaeg (Eds.), Chatbot Research and Design: Third International Workshop (pp. 113-126). Springer.Pulman, S., Boye, J., Cavazza, M., Smith, C. & de La Cámara, R. (2010). How was your day? Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Companionable Dialogue Systems ACL, 37-42. https://aclanthology.org/W10-2707.pdfRouvroy, A. (2008). Privacy, data protection, and the unprecedented challenges of ambient intelligence.Studies in ethics, law, and technology, 2(1), 1-51. https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1001Sağlam, R., & Nurse, J. (2020). Is your chatbot GDPR compliant? Open issues in agent design.Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (pp. 1-3). https://doi.org/10.1145/3405755.3406131Satzger, B., Endres, M. & Kießling, W. (2006). A Preference-Based Recommender System. In K.Bauknecht, B. Pröll & H. Werthner (Eds.), E-Commerce and Web Technologies: 7th International Conference (pp. 31-40). Springer.Shechtman, N., & Horowitz, L. (2003). Media inequality in conversation: how people behave differently when interacting with computers and people. CHI ‘03: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 281-288). https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642661Skinner, G., Han, S., & Chang, E. (2006). An information privacy taxonomy for collaborative environments. Information management & computer security, 14(4), 382-394.Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., & Burke, S. J. (1996). Information privacy: Measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices. MIS quarterly, 167-196.Solove, D. J. (2006). A Taxonomy of Privacy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 154(3), 477-564. https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/pnlr154&section=20Solvan. (12 de marzo de 2018). Chatbot, asistente virtual y agente conversacional. Solvan. https://solvanweb.com.mx/chatbot-asistente-virtual-y-agente-conversacionalVäänänen, K., Hiltunen, A., Varsaluoma, J. y Pietilä, I. (2020). CivicBots – Chatbots for Supporting Youth in Societal Participation. In A. Følstad, T. Araujo, S. Papadopoulos, E. Lai-Chong Law, O. Granmo,E. Luger & P. Brandtzaeg (Eds.), Chatbot Research and Design: Third International Workshop, CONVERSATIONS 2019 Amsterdam (pp. 143-157). Springer.Von der Pütten, A. M., Krämer, N., Gratch, J., & Kang, S. (2010). It doesn’t matter what you are! Explaining social effects of agents and avatars. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.012Warren, S., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4, 193-220. West, M., Kraut, R., & Chew, H. (2019). I’d blush if I could: closing gender divides in digital skills through education. UNESCO.Wilks, Y. (2010). Is a Companion a distinctive kind of relationship with a machine? Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Companionable Dialogue Systems, 13-18. https://aclanthology.org/W10-2703.pdfNúm. 2 , Año 2023 : Julio-Diciembrehttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/juridicas/article/download/9483/7636https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Chávez Valdivia, Ana Karinoai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/243932025-10-08T21:32:00Z

Publicaciones similares