Al-Ghazali and Descartes from doubt to certainty: a phenomenological approach

Este artículo aclara la relación entre Al-Ghazali y René Descartes, para articular similitudes y diferencias en sus respectivos periplos desde la duda a la certidumbre. Algunos investigadores concuerdan en que los argumentos de la duda que emplean Descartes y AlGhazali son similares, pero identifi c...

Full description

Autores:

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2017

Institución:: Universidad de Caldas

Repositorio:: Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas

Idioma:: spa

id	REPOUCALDA_23abce3cf73e73e5164415fcacc2ab7c
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/15568
network_acronym_str	REPOUCALDA
network_name_str	Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv	Al-Ghazali and Descartes from doubt to certainty: a phenomenological approach Al-Ghazali y Descartes de la duda a la certeza: una aproximación fenomenológica
title	Al-Ghazali and Descartes from doubt to certainty: a phenomenological approach
spellingShingle	Al-Ghazali and Descartes from doubt to certainty: a phenomenological approach Al-Ghazali René Descartes phenomenology Edmund Husserl epistemology scepticism Al-Ghazali René Descartes fenomenología Edmund Husserl epistemología escepticismo
title_short	Al-Ghazali and Descartes from doubt to certainty: a phenomenological approach
title_full	Al-Ghazali and Descartes from doubt to certainty: a phenomenological approach
title_fullStr	Al-Ghazali and Descartes from doubt to certainty: a phenomenological approach
title_full_unstemmed	Al-Ghazali and Descartes from doubt to certainty: a phenomenological approach
title_sort	Al-Ghazali and Descartes from doubt to certainty: a phenomenological approach
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv	Al-Ghazali René Descartes phenomenology Edmund Husserl epistemology scepticism Al-Ghazali René Descartes fenomenología Edmund Husserl epistemología escepticismo
topic	Al-Ghazali René Descartes phenomenology Edmund Husserl epistemology scepticism Al-Ghazali René Descartes fenomenología Edmund Husserl epistemología escepticismo
description	Este artículo aclara la relación entre Al-Ghazali y René Descartes, para articular similitudes y diferencias en sus respectivos periplos desde la duda a la certidumbre. Algunos investigadores concuerdan en que los argumentos de la duda que emplean Descartes y AlGhazali son similares, pero identifi can sus caminos desde la duda como radicalmente diferentes: mientras Descartes encontró la superación de la duda mediante el cogito o la razón, Al-Ghazali fi nalizó su Aventura fi losófi ca como un Sufi , abrumado por su experiencia místico-religiosa. Este artículo demuestra lo contrario. Bajo un cuidadoso escrutinio textual y aprovechando algunos conceptos fenomenológicos básicos de Husserl, planteo que la posición de AlGhazali fue malinterpretada, y así revelo su verdadera naturaleza filosófica.
publishDate	2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv	2017-07-01 00:00:00 2017-07-01 00:00:00 2017-07-01 2021-02-04T14:55:32Z 2021-02-04T14:55:32Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	Sección Artículos Artículo de revista Journal Article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Text info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv	0124-6127 https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2017.18.31.2. https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/15568 10.17151/difil.2017.18.31.2. 2462-9596
identifier_str_mv	0124-6127 10.17151/difil.2017.18.31.2. 2462-9596
url	https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2017.18.31.2. https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/15568
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv	spa
language	spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv	40 31 15 18 Discusiones Filosóficas Albertini, T. “Crisis and Certainty of Knowledge in Al-Ghazāl (1058-1111) and Descartes (1596-1650).” Philosophy East and West. 2005: 1-14. Alfalahi, A. Naqd Al-aql bayna Al-Ghazali wa Kant (Critique of Reason between Al-Ghazali and Kant). Beirut: Almo’assa Algame’eyya ledderasat, 2003. Al-Ghazali. Al-Mustasfa min ‘ilm al-isul. Translated by Hammad, Ahmad Zaki, unpublished PhD dissertation. The University of Chicago, 1987. ---. Revival of Religious Sciences(Ihya’ Ulum Aldin). Cairo, Egypt: Al-Ahram Center for Translation and Publication, 1988. ---. Moderation in Belief (Al-Iqtisad fi Al-I’Tiqad). Translated by Aladdin M. Yaqoub. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003. ---. Deliverance from Error (Al-Munqith min al-Dalal). Translated by Richard Joseph McCarthy. Louisville: Fons Vitae, 2006 (original work published 1116). Al-Kaa'k, O. Al-Ahram daily newspaper, Egypt, 30-7-1976. Al-Najjar, A. Viewpoints on Al-Ghazali’s Thought (Natharat fi fikr AlGhazali). Cairo, Egypt: Dar Al-Ma’aref, 1992. Bernet, R., Kern, I. and E. Marbach. An Introduction to Husserlian Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1993. Descartes, R. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch, 2 volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. Doney, W. “The Cartesian Circle.” Journal of the History of Ideas. 1955: 324-338. Esposito, J. L. Oxford Dictionary of Islam. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003 Husserl, E. The Idea of Phenomenology. Translated by Lee Hardy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999. Menn, S. “The Discourse on the Method and the Tradition of Intellectual Autobiography,” Miller, J. and B. Inwood (Eds.). Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Moad, O. E. “Comparing Phases of Skepticism in Al-Ghazali and Descartes: Some First Meditations on Deliverance from Error.” Philosophy East and West. 2009: 88-101. Moghniya, M. J. Ma’alem Al-falsafa Al-Islamiya (Characteristics of Islamic Philosophy). Beirut, Lebanon: Al-Hilal Publishing House, 1973. Najm, S. M. “The Place and Function of Doubt in the Philosophies of Descartes and Al-GGhazāl.” Philosophy East and West. 1966: 133-141. Naumkin, V. V. “Some Problems Related to the Study of Works by AlGhazzali.” Ghazzali: La Raison et le Miracle, Paris: UNESCO, 1987. Rose, L. E. “The Cartesian Circle.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 1965: 80-81. Sharif, M. M. “Influence of Muslim Though on the West.” Sharif, M. M. (Ed.). A History of Muslim Philosophy. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrasowitz, 1963. Wilson, C. “Modern Western Philosophy,” Nasr, S. H. and O. Leaman (Eds.). History of Islamic Philosophy, part 2. London: Routledge, 1996. Núm. 31 , Año 2017 : Julio - Diciembre https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/2865/2646
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv	Derechos de autor 2017 Discusiones Filosóficas https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	Derechos de autor 2017 Discusiones Filosóficas https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Caldas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Caldas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/2865
institution	Universidad de Caldas
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_	1836145085961469952
spelling	Al-Ghazali and Descartes from doubt to certainty: a phenomenological approachAl-Ghazali y Descartes de la duda a la certeza: una aproximación fenomenológicaAl-GhazaliRené DescartesphenomenologyEdmund HusserlepistemologyscepticismAl-GhazaliRené DescartesfenomenologíaEdmund HusserlepistemologíaescepticismoEste artículo aclara la relación entre Al-Ghazali y René Descartes, para articular similitudes y diferencias en sus respectivos periplos desde la duda a la certidumbre. Algunos investigadores concuerdan en que los argumentos de la duda que emplean Descartes y AlGhazali son similares, pero identifi can sus caminos desde la duda como radicalmente diferentes: mientras Descartes encontró la superación de la duda mediante el cogito o la razón, Al-Ghazali fi nalizó su Aventura fi losófi ca como un Sufi , abrumado por su experiencia místico-religiosa. Este artículo demuestra lo contrario. Bajo un cuidadoso escrutinio textual y aprovechando algunos conceptos fenomenológicos básicos de Husserl, planteo que la posición de AlGhazali fue malinterpretada, y así revelo su verdadera naturaleza filosófica.This paper clarifies the philosophical connection between Al-Ghazali and René Descartes, to articulate similarities and differences in their journeys from doubt to certainty. Some scholars agree that the doubt arguments used by Descartes and Al-Ghazali are similar, but identify their departures from doubt as radically different: while Descartes found his way out of doubt through the cogito or reason, Al-Ghazali ended his philosophical journey as a Sufi , overwhelmed by his religious-mystical experience. This paper proves the opposite. Under close textual scrutiny and using of basic Husserlian-phenomenological concepts, I show that Al-Ghazali’s position was misunderstood, and thus disclose his true philosophic nature.Universidad de Caldas2017-07-01 00:00:002021-02-04T14:55:32Z2017-07-01 00:00:002021-02-04T14:55:32Z2017-07-01Sección ArtículosArtículo de revistaJournal Articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1application/pdf0124-6127https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2017.18.31.2.https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/1556810.17151/difil.2017.18.31.2.2462-9596https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/2865spa40311518Discusiones FilosóficasAlbertini, T. “Crisis and Certainty of Knowledge in Al-Ghazāl (1058-1111) and Descartes (1596-1650).” Philosophy East and West. 2005: 1-14.Alfalahi, A. Naqd Al-aql bayna Al-Ghazali wa Kant (Critique of Reason between Al-Ghazali and Kant). Beirut: Almo’assa Algame’eyya ledderasat, 2003.Al-Ghazali. Al-Mustasfa min ‘ilm al-isul. Translated by Hammad, Ahmad Zaki, unpublished PhD dissertation. The University of Chicago, 1987.---. Revival of Religious Sciences(Ihya’ Ulum Aldin). Cairo, Egypt: Al-Ahram Center for Translation and Publication, 1988.---. Moderation in Belief (Al-Iqtisad fi Al-I’Tiqad). Translated by Aladdin M. Yaqoub. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.---. Deliverance from Error (Al-Munqith min al-Dalal). Translated by Richard Joseph McCarthy. Louisville: Fons Vitae, 2006 (original work published 1116).Al-Kaa'k, O. Al-Ahram daily newspaper, Egypt, 30-7-1976.Al-Najjar, A. Viewpoints on Al-Ghazali’s Thought (Natharat fi fikr AlGhazali). Cairo, Egypt: Dar Al-Ma’aref, 1992.Bernet, R., Kern, I. and E. Marbach. An Introduction to Husserlian Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1993.Descartes, R. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch, 2 volumes.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Doney, W. “The Cartesian Circle.” Journal of the History of Ideas. 1955: 324-338.Esposito, J. L. Oxford Dictionary of Islam. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003Husserl, E. The Idea of Phenomenology. Translated by Lee Hardy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.Menn, S. “The Discourse on the Method and the Tradition of Intellectual Autobiography,” Miller, J. and B. Inwood (Eds.). Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Moad, O. E. “Comparing Phases of Skepticism in Al-Ghazali and Descartes: Some First Meditations on Deliverance from Error.” Philosophy East and West. 2009: 88-101.Moghniya, M. J. Ma’alem Al-falsafa Al-Islamiya (Characteristics of Islamic Philosophy). Beirut, Lebanon: Al-Hilal Publishing House, 1973.Najm, S. M. “The Place and Function of Doubt in the Philosophies of Descartes and Al-GGhazāl.” Philosophy East and West. 1966: 133-141.Naumkin, V. V. “Some Problems Related to the Study of Works by AlGhazzali.” Ghazzali: La Raison et le Miracle, Paris: UNESCO, 1987.Rose, L. E. “The Cartesian Circle.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 1965: 80-81.Sharif, M. M. “Influence of Muslim Though on the West.” Sharif, M. M.(Ed.). A History of Muslim Philosophy. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrasowitz, 1963.Wilson, C. “Modern Western Philosophy,” Nasr, S. H. and O. Leaman (Eds.). History of Islamic Philosophy, part 2. London: Routledge, 1996.Núm. 31 , Año 2017 : Julio - Diciembrehttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/download/2865/2646Derechos de autor 2017 Discusiones Filosóficashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2ALWAHAIB, MOHAMMADoai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/155682024-07-16T21:49:13Z

Al-Ghazali and Descartes from doubt to certainty: a phenomenological approach

Publicaciones similares