Heurísticos estéticos para el diseño: determinantes cognitivos y socio-culturales

&nbsp; El placer estético se obtiene a partir de la percepción sensorial. Este placer depende de tres aspectos: las propiedades físicas del objeto, las cualidades del perceptor y cuatro tipos de determinantes estéticos. Los determinantes perceptuales y estándares de belleza se han estudiado...

Full description

Autores:

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2024

Institución:: Universidad de Caldas

Repositorio:: Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas

Idioma:: eng

id	REPOUCALDA_113e4bc6c2858cb49b8384ef865e6d0e
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/24541
network_acronym_str	REPOUCALDA
network_name_str	Repositorio Institucional U. Caldas
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv	Heurísticos estéticos para el diseño: determinantes cognitivos y socio-culturales Aesthetic heuristics for design: cognitive and sociocultural determinants
title	Heurísticos estéticos para el diseño: determinantes cognitivos y socio-culturales
spellingShingle	Heurísticos estéticos para el diseño: determinantes cognitivos y socio-culturales Heurísticos placer estético diseño belleza Heuristics aesthetic pleasure design beauty
title_short	Heurísticos estéticos para el diseño: determinantes cognitivos y socio-culturales
title_full	Heurísticos estéticos para el diseño: determinantes cognitivos y socio-culturales
title_fullStr	Heurísticos estéticos para el diseño: determinantes cognitivos y socio-culturales
title_full_unstemmed	Heurísticos estéticos para el diseño: determinantes cognitivos y socio-culturales
title_sort	Heurísticos estéticos para el diseño: determinantes cognitivos y socio-culturales
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv	Heurísticos placer estético diseño belleza Heuristics aesthetic pleasure design beauty
topic	Heurísticos placer estético diseño belleza Heuristics aesthetic pleasure design beauty
description	&nbsp; El placer estético se obtiene a partir de la percepción sensorial. Este placer depende de tres aspectos: las propiedades físicas del objeto, las cualidades del perceptor y cuatro tipos de determinantes estéticos. Los determinantes perceptuales y estándares de belleza se han estudiado científicamente. Así mismo se han desarrollado muchas de las reglas metodológicas conocidas y usadas por los diseñadores durante décadas; el equilibrio, la buena proporción y las leyes de la Gestalt. Por el contrario, los determinantes cognitivos y socioculturales carecen de métodos que apoyen el proceso de diseño estético de los diseñadores. El uso de los heurísticos como método de apoyo a este proceso, podría ser un medio para ampliar las posibilidades estéticas del producto cuando se dispone de tiempo y conocimientos limitados. Mediante una revisión de la literatura y un análisis de los productos premiados, identificamos, extrajimos, organizamos y clasificamos los heurísticos estéticos, dando como resultado un repertorio de 48 heurísticos estéticos de los determinantes cognitivos y socioculturales. Usamos estos heurísticos en dos estudios exploratorios. Los resultados mostraron que estos heurísticos permiten crear ideas nuevas y originales en menos tiempo de lo habitual y ampliar las posibilidades en el proceso de diseño estético.
publishDate	2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv	2024-07-01T00:00:00Z 2024-07-01T00:00:00Z 2024-07-01 2025-10-08T21:36:41Z 2025-10-08T21:36:41Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Text info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv	1794-7111 https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/24541 10.17151/kepes.2024.21.30.8 2462-8115 https://doi.org/10.17151/kepes.2024.21.30.8
identifier_str_mv	1794-7111 10.17151/kepes.2024.21.30.8 2462-8115
url	https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/24541 https://doi.org/10.17151/kepes.2024.21.30.8
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv	263 30 221 21 Kepes Abraira, V. (2001). El índice kappa. Semergen-Medicina de Familia, 247-249. Ahmed, S., Wallace, K.M., Blessing, L.T. (2003). Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in engineering design, 14, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-002-0023-z Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. University of California Press. Arnheim, R. (1983). The power of the center: A study of composition in the visual arts. University of California Press. Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W.D. (1981). The Evolution of cooperation. Science, 211 (4489), 1390-1396. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7466396 Baxter, M. (1995). Product design: A practical guide to systematic methods of new product development. Champman and Hall. Bentley, P.J. & Corne, D.W., (2002). Creative Evolutionary Systems, Academic Press. Berghman, M. & Hekkert, P., 2017. Towards a unified model of aesthetic pleasure in design. New Ideas in Psychology, 47(136-144). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.03.004 Berlyne. D.E. (1966). Curiosity and exploration. Science, 153(3731), 25-33. Blijlevens, J., Thurgood, C., Hekkert, P., Leder, H., Whitfield, T.W.A. (2014). The development of a reliable and valid scale to measure aesthetic pleasure in design. In Proceedings of the 23rd Biennial Congress of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics, 22-24th August 2014, New York, USA. Bloch, P. H. (1995). Seeking the ideal form: product design and consumer response. The Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242995059003 Bornstein, R.F. (1989). Exposure and effect: overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 265-289. Bowers, J. (1999). Introduction to two-dimensional design: Understanding form and function.John Wiley & Sons. Cadavid, A., Ruiz, S., Maya, J. (2016). Extracting Design Aesthetics Heuristics from Scientific Literature. In: Lloyd, P. & Bohemia, E. (Eds.), Future Focused Thinking - DRS International Conference Proceedings, Brighton, UK. Conger, A.J. (1980). Integration and generalization of kappas for multiple raters. Psychological bulletin, 88(2), 322. Cooper, R. (2011). Winning at new products: Creating value through innovation. Basic Books. Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., & Clarkson, J.P. (2004). Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Design Studies, 25(6), 547-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.03.001 Cross, N. (1989). Engineering design methods. New York: Wiley. Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: an overview. Design Studies, 25(5) 427-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.002 Crozier, R. (1994). Manufactured pleasures: psychological responses to design. Manchester University Press. Da Silva, O, Crilly, N., Hekkert, P. (2013). Aesthetic appreciation of products: the effect of ideas underlying design. “Consilience and Innovation in Design”: Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of International Association of Societies of Design Research. 26-30 August 2013, Tokyo. Daly, S., Yilmaz, S., Christian, J., Seifert, C., & Gonzalez, R. (2012). Design Heuristics in engineering concept generation. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 601-629. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01121.x Daly, S., Christian, J.L., Seifert, C., Gonzalez, R., Yilmaz, S. (2014). Design Heuristics 77 cards. Design Heuristics, LLC Elam, K. (2001). Geometry of design: studies in proportion and composition. Princeton Architectural Press. Faimon, P. & Weigand, J. (2004). The nature of design. HOW Books. Figure 3,9: Buydeem Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China. (2022, 28 January). Kettle K206 [Photography]. https://www.red-dot.org. https://www.red-dot.org/project/k206-31242 Figure 5,10: Invacare France Operations SAS, Fondettes, France. (2022, 28 January). Action 5 / MyOn HC [Photography]. https://www.red-dot.org. https://www.red-dot.org/project/action-5-myon-hc-33172 Figure 10: Springetts Brand Design Consultants Ltd, London. (2022, 28 January). Williamson Tea Limited Edition Caddie [Photography]. https://www.red-dot.org. https://www.red-dot.org/project/williamson-tea-limited-edition-caddies-20952 Galanter, P. (2012). Computational aesthetic evaluation: steps towards machine creativity. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2012 Courses, (pp. 1-162). Gatto, J.A., Porter, A.W. & Selleck, J. (1978). Exploring visual design. Davis Publications. Gigerenzer, G, Todd, P.M., & ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple Heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press. Hannah, G.G. (2002). Elements of design: Rowena Reed Kostellow and the structure of visual relationships. Princeton Architectural Press. Hekkert, P. (2014). Aesthetic responses to design: A battle of impulses. In Tinio, P.P.L., Smith, J.K. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of aesthetics and the arts, CUP, (pp.277-299). Hekkert, P., & Leder, H. (2008). Product Aesthetics, in: Schifferstein, H.N.J., & Hekkert, P. (Eds.), Product Experience, (pp. 259-285), Elsevier. Kim, K., & Nam, T.J. (2014). Designing Unique Products with Self-morphing Randomness. Archives of Design Research, 27(1), 7-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.15187/adr.2014.02.109.1.7 Kimball, M. (2013). Visual design principles: An empirical study of design lore. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 43(1), 3-41. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.43.1.b Köhler, W., (1992). Gestalt psychology: An introduction to new concepts in modern psychology, WW Norton & Company. Kotler, P., Rath, A.G. (1984). Design: A powerful but neglected strategic tool. Journal of business strategy, 5(2),16-21. Krippendorff, K. (1989). Product semantics: A triangulation and four design theories. In Product Semantic ’89. Väkevä, S. (Ed.) Helsinki, Finland, University of Industrial Arts, 1990. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage. Krippendorff, K., & Butter, R. (1984). Product Semantics: Exploring the symbolic qualities of form. Innovation, 3(2), 4-9. Lauer, D.A. & Pentak, S. (2011). Design Basics. Cengage Learning. Levinson, J., (Ed.), (2003). The Oxford handbook of aesthetics, Oxford University Press. Lidwell, W., Holden, K., & Butler, J. (2010). Universal principles of design, revised and updated: 125 ways to enhance usability, influence perception, increase appeal, make better design decisions, and teach through design. Rockport Pub. Loftus, E.F., & Beach, L.R. (1982). Human inference and judgment: Is the glass half empty or half full? Stanford Law Review, 34, 939- 956. Lu, C.C. (2015). The relationship between student design cognition types and creative design outcomes. Design Studies, 36, 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2014.08.002 Ludden, G.D., Schifferstein, H.N. & Hekkert, P., (2004). Visual-tactual incongruities: Surprises in products. Department of Industrial Design, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands. Ludden, G.D., Schifferstein, H.N. & Hekkert, P., (2012). Beyond surprise: A longitudinal study on the experience of visual-tactual incongruities in products. International journal of design, 6(1). Luecking, S. (2002). Principles of Three-dimensional Design: Objects, Space, and Meaning. Prentice Hall. Martindale, C. (1999). Peak shift, prototypicality and aesthetic preference. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (6-7), 52-54. Nisbett, R.E., Krantz, D.H., Jepson, C., & Kunda, Z. (1983). The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological review, 90(4), 339. Norman, D.A. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic Books. Nussbaum, B., (1988). Smart Design, Business Week, (April 11), 102-1 Padovan, R. (1999). Proportion: Science, Philosophy, Architecture. Taylor & Francis. Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J. & Grote, K.H. (2013). Engineering design: a systematic approach. Springer Science & Business Media. Quarante, D. (1994). Eléments de design industriel. Polytechnica. Ramachandran, V.S., Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetics experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, (6-7), 15-51. Roozenburg, N.F.M. & Eekels, J. (1995). Product Design: Fundamental and Methods. Wiley. Samara, T. (2008). Design evolution: a handbook of basic design principles applied in contemporary design. Rockport Pub. Sausmarez, M.D. (1992). Basic design: the dynamics of visual form. Bloomsbury Publishing. Scholfield, P., (2011). The Theory of Proportion in Architecture, (Reissue edition), Cambridge University Press. Shah, J.J., Kulkarni, S.V., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2000). Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: effectiveness metrics and design of experiments. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122(4), 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1315592 Snelders, D., & Hekkert, P. (1999). Association measures as predictors of product originality. NA - Advances in Consumer Research, 26(1), 588-592. Stone, R.B. & Wood, K. (2000). Development of a functional basis for design. Journal of Mechanical design. 122(December), 359-370. Ulrich, K. & Eppinger, S.D. (1995). Product design and development, Singapore: McGraw. Veryzer Jr., R.W. (1993). Aesthetic response and the influence of design principles on product preferences. Advances in Consumer Research, 20(1). Veryzer Jr., R.W. (1999). A nonconscious processing explanation of consumer response to product design. Psychology & Marketing 16(6), 497-522. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199909)16:6%3C497::AID-MAR4%3E3.0.CO;2-Z Whitfield, T.W.A. (1983). Predicting preference for familiar, everyday objects: An experimental confrontation between two theories of aesthetic behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(3), 221-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80002-4 Wilson, R.A., Keil, F.C. (Eds.), (2001). The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences. MIT Press. Wolchonok, L., (2013). The Art of Three-Dimensional Design, Courier Dover Publications. Wong, W. (1993). Principles of form and design. John Wiley & Sons. Yilmaz, S. (2010). Design Heuristics. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan]. Yilmaz, S., Daly, S. Christian, J.L., Seifert, C., & Gonzalez, R. (2014). Can experienced designers learn from new tools? A case study of idea generation in a professional engineering team, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 2(2), 82-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2013.832016 Zajonc, R.B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 9(2p2), 1-27. Zelanski, P. & Fisher, M.P. (2007). The art of seeing, 7th ed., Prentice-Hall. Núm. 30 , Año 2024 : Julio-Diciembre https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/download/9735/7727
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
rights_invalid_str_mv	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv	application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Caldas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Universidad de Caldas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/9735
institution	Universidad de Caldas
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_	1855532518737969152
spelling	Heurísticos estéticos para el diseño: determinantes cognitivos y socio-culturalesAesthetic heuristics for design: cognitive and sociocultural determinantsHeurísticosplacer estéticodiseñobellezaHeuristicsaesthetic pleasuredesignbeauty&nbsp; El placer estético se obtiene a partir de la percepción sensorial. Este placer depende de tres aspectos: las propiedades físicas del objeto, las cualidades del perceptor y cuatro tipos de determinantes estéticos. Los determinantes perceptuales y estándares de belleza se han estudiado científicamente. Así mismo se han desarrollado muchas de las reglas metodológicas conocidas y usadas por los diseñadores durante décadas; el equilibrio, la buena proporción y las leyes de la Gestalt. Por el contrario, los determinantes cognitivos y socioculturales carecen de métodos que apoyen el proceso de diseño estético de los diseñadores. El uso de los heurísticos como método de apoyo a este proceso, podría ser un medio para ampliar las posibilidades estéticas del producto cuando se dispone de tiempo y conocimientos limitados. Mediante una revisión de la literatura y un análisis de los productos premiados, identificamos, extrajimos, organizamos y clasificamos los heurísticos estéticos, dando como resultado un repertorio de 48 heurísticos estéticos de los determinantes cognitivos y socioculturales. Usamos estos heurísticos en dos estudios exploratorios. Los resultados mostraron que estos heurísticos permiten crear ideas nuevas y originales en menos tiempo de lo habitual y ampliar las posibilidades en el proceso de diseño estético.Aesthetic pleasure is derived from sensory perception. This pleasure depends on three aspects: the physical properties of the object, the qualities of the perceiver, and four types of aesthetic determinants. Perceptual determinants and beauty standards have been studied scientifically and many methodological rules known and used by designers for decades, such as balance, good proportion, and Gestalt laws, have also been developed. In contrast, cognitive and socio-cultural determinants lack methods to support the aesthetic design process of designers. The use of heuristics as a method of support to this process could be a means of extending the aesthetic possibilities of the product when limited time and knowledge are available. Through a literature review and an analysis of award-winning products the aesthetic heuristics were identified, extracted, organized, and classified, resulting in a repertoire of 48 aesthetic heuristics of cognitive and socio-cultural determinants which were used in two exploratory studies. The results showed that these heuristics allow new and original ideas to be created in less time than usual and expand the possibilities in the aesthetic design process.Universidad de Caldas2024-07-01T00:00:00Z2025-10-08T21:36:41Z2024-07-01T00:00:00Z2025-10-08T21:36:41Z2024-07-01Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1application/pdf1794-7111https://repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co/handle/ucaldas/2454110.17151/kepes.2024.21.30.82462-8115https://doi.org/10.17151/kepes.2024.21.30.8https://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/view/9735eng2633022121KepesAbraira, V. (2001). El índice kappa. Semergen-Medicina de Familia, 247-249.Ahmed, S., Wallace, K.M., Blessing, L.T. (2003). Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in engineering design, 14, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-002-0023-zArnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. University of California Press.Arnheim, R. (1983). The power of the center: A study of composition in the visual arts. University of California Press.Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W.D. (1981). The Evolution of cooperation. Science, 211 (4489), 1390-1396. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7466396Baxter, M. (1995). Product design: A practical guide to systematic methods of new product development. Champman and Hall.Bentley, P.J. & Corne, D.W., (2002). Creative Evolutionary Systems, Academic Press.Berghman, M. & Hekkert, P., 2017. Towards a unified model of aesthetic pleasure in design. New Ideas in Psychology, 47(136-144). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.03.004Berlyne. D.E. (1966). Curiosity and exploration. Science, 153(3731), 25-33.Blijlevens, J., Thurgood, C., Hekkert, P., Leder, H., Whitfield, T.W.A. (2014). The development of a reliable and valid scale to measure aesthetic pleasure in design. In Proceedings of the 23rd Biennial Congress of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics, 22-24th August 2014, New York, USA.Bloch, P. H. (1995). Seeking the ideal form: product design and consumer response. The Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242995059003Bornstein, R.F. (1989). Exposure and effect: overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 265-289.Bowers, J. (1999). Introduction to two-dimensional design: Understanding form and function.John Wiley & Sons.Cadavid, A., Ruiz, S., Maya, J. (2016). Extracting Design Aesthetics Heuristics from Scientific Literature. In: Lloyd, P. & Bohemia, E. (Eds.), Future Focused Thinking - DRS International Conference Proceedings, Brighton, UK.Conger, A.J. (1980). Integration and generalization of kappas for multiple raters. Psychological bulletin, 88(2), 322.Cooper, R. (2011). Winning at new products: Creating value through innovation. Basic Books.Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., & Clarkson, J.P. (2004). Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Design Studies, 25(6), 547-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.03.001Cross, N. (1989). Engineering design methods. New York: Wiley.Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: an overview. Design Studies, 25(5) 427-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.002Crozier, R. (1994). Manufactured pleasures: psychological responses to design. Manchester University Press.Da Silva, O, Crilly, N., Hekkert, P. (2013). Aesthetic appreciation of products: the effect of ideas underlying design. “Consilience and Innovation in Design”: Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of International Association of Societies of Design Research. 26-30 August 2013, Tokyo.Daly, S., Yilmaz, S., Christian, J., Seifert, C., & Gonzalez, R. (2012). Design Heuristics in engineering concept generation. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 601-629. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01121.xDaly, S., Christian, J.L., Seifert, C., Gonzalez, R., Yilmaz, S. (2014). Design Heuristics 77 cards. Design Heuristics, LLCElam, K. (2001). Geometry of design: studies in proportion and composition. Princeton Architectural Press.Faimon, P. & Weigand, J. (2004). The nature of design. HOW Books.Figure 3,9: Buydeem Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China. (2022, 28 January). Kettle K206 [Photography]. https://www.red-dot.org. https://www.red-dot.org/project/k206-31242Figure 5,10: Invacare France Operations SAS, Fondettes, France. (2022, 28 January). Action 5 / MyOn HC [Photography]. https://www.red-dot.org. https://www.red-dot.org/project/action-5-myon-hc-33172Figure 10: Springetts Brand Design Consultants Ltd, London. (2022, 28 January). Williamson Tea Limited Edition Caddie [Photography]. https://www.red-dot.org. https://www.red-dot.org/project/williamson-tea-limited-edition-caddies-20952Galanter, P. (2012). Computational aesthetic evaluation: steps towards machine creativity. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2012 Courses, (pp. 1-162).Gatto, J.A., Porter, A.W. & Selleck, J. (1978). Exploring visual design. Davis Publications.Gigerenzer, G, Todd, P.M., & ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple Heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press.Hannah, G.G. (2002). Elements of design: Rowena Reed Kostellow and the structure of visual relationships. Princeton Architectural Press.Hekkert, P. (2014). Aesthetic responses to design: A battle of impulses. In Tinio, P.P.L., Smith, J.K. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of aesthetics and the arts, CUP, (pp.277-299).Hekkert, P., & Leder, H. (2008). Product Aesthetics, in: Schifferstein, H.N.J., & Hekkert, P. (Eds.), Product Experience, (pp. 259-285), Elsevier.Kim, K., & Nam, T.J. (2014). Designing Unique Products with Self-morphing Randomness. Archives of Design Research, 27(1), 7-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.15187/adr.2014.02.109.1.7Kimball, M. (2013). Visual design principles: An empirical study of design lore. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 43(1), 3-41. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.43.1.bKöhler, W., (1992). Gestalt psychology: An introduction to new concepts in modern psychology, WW Norton & Company.Kotler, P., Rath, A.G. (1984). Design: A powerful but neglected strategic tool. Journal of business strategy, 5(2),16-21.Krippendorff, K. (1989). Product semantics: A triangulation and four design theories. In Product Semantic ’89. Väkevä, S. (Ed.) Helsinki, Finland, University of Industrial Arts, 1990.Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.Krippendorff, K., & Butter, R. (1984). Product Semantics: Exploring the symbolic qualities of form. Innovation, 3(2), 4-9.Lauer, D.A. & Pentak, S. (2011). Design Basics. Cengage Learning.Levinson, J., (Ed.), (2003). The Oxford handbook of aesthetics, Oxford University Press.Lidwell, W., Holden, K., & Butler, J. (2010). Universal principles of design, revised and updated: 125 ways to enhance usability, influence perception, increase appeal, make better design decisions, and teach through design. Rockport Pub.Loftus, E.F., & Beach, L.R. (1982). Human inference and judgment: Is the glass half empty or half full? Stanford Law Review, 34, 939- 956.Lu, C.C. (2015). The relationship between student design cognition types and creative design outcomes. Design Studies, 36, 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2014.08.002Ludden, G.D., Schifferstein, H.N. & Hekkert, P., (2004). Visual-tactual incongruities: Surprises in products. Department of Industrial Design, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.Ludden, G.D., Schifferstein, H.N. & Hekkert, P., (2012). Beyond surprise: A longitudinal study on the experience of visual-tactual incongruities in products. International journal of design, 6(1).Luecking, S. (2002). Principles of Three-dimensional Design: Objects, Space, and Meaning. Prentice Hall.Martindale, C. (1999). Peak shift, prototypicality and aesthetic preference. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (6-7), 52-54.Nisbett, R.E., Krantz, D.H., Jepson, C., & Kunda, Z. (1983). The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological review, 90(4), 339.Norman, D.A. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic Books.Nussbaum, B., (1988). Smart Design, Business Week, (April 11), 102-1Padovan, R. (1999). Proportion: Science, Philosophy, Architecture. Taylor & Francis. Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J. & Grote, K.H. (2013). Engineering design: a systematic approach. Springer Science & Business Media.Quarante, D. (1994). Eléments de design industriel. Polytechnica.Ramachandran, V.S., Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetics experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, (6-7), 15-51.Roozenburg, N.F.M. & Eekels, J. (1995). Product Design: Fundamental and Methods. Wiley.Samara, T. (2008). Design evolution: a handbook of basic design principles applied in contemporary design. Rockport Pub.Sausmarez, M.D. (1992). Basic design: the dynamics of visual form. Bloomsbury Publishing.Scholfield, P., (2011). The Theory of Proportion in Architecture, (Reissue edition), Cambridge University Press.Shah, J.J., Kulkarni, S.V., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2000). Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: effectiveness metrics and design of experiments. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122(4), 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1315592Snelders, D., & Hekkert, P. (1999). Association measures as predictors of product originality. NA - Advances in Consumer Research, 26(1), 588-592.Stone, R.B. & Wood, K. (2000). Development of a functional basis for design. Journal of Mechanical design. 122(December), 359-370.Ulrich, K. & Eppinger, S.D. (1995). Product design and development, Singapore: McGraw.Veryzer Jr., R.W. (1993). Aesthetic response and the influence of design principles on product preferences. Advances in Consumer Research, 20(1).Veryzer Jr., R.W. (1999). A nonconscious processing explanation of consumer response to product design. Psychology & Marketing 16(6), 497-522. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199909)16:6%3C497::AID-MAR4%3E3.0.CO;2-ZWhitfield, T.W.A. (1983). Predicting preference for familiar, everyday objects: An experimental confrontation between two theories of aesthetic behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(3), 221-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80002-4Wilson, R.A., Keil, F.C. (Eds.), (2001). The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences. MIT Press.Wolchonok, L., (2013). The Art of Three-Dimensional Design, Courier Dover Publications.Wong, W. (1993). Principles of form and design. John Wiley & Sons.Yilmaz, S. (2010). Design Heuristics. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan].Yilmaz, S., Daly, S. Christian, J.L., Seifert, C., & Gonzalez, R. (2014). Can experienced designers learn from new tools? A case study of idea generation in a professional engineering team, International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 2(2), 82-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2013.832016Zajonc, R.B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 9(2p2), 1-27.Zelanski, P. & Fisher, M.P. (2007). The art of seeing, 7th ed., Prentice-Hall.Núm. 30 , Año 2024 : Julio-Diciembrehttps://revistasojs.ucaldas.edu.co/index.php/kepes/article/download/9735/7727https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Cadavid, AnaMaya, Jorgeoai:repositorio.ucaldas.edu.co:ucaldas/245412025-10-08T21:36:41Z

Heurísticos estéticos para el diseño: determinantes cognitivos y socio-culturales

Publicaciones similares