Hacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales: el caso colombiano
Este artículo presenta nuevas estimaciones de distancia en los negocios internacionales entre Colombia y 57 países de Europa, América, Asia, África y Oceanía. El concepto de distancia que utilizamos trasciende el plano de lo institucional e incorpora tanto aspectos institucionales como aquellos que...
- Autores:
-
Caicedo Marulanda , Carolina
Pla Barber, Jose
León-Darder, Fidel
Mora Rodríguez, Jhon James
- Tipo de recurso:
- Article of journal
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2017
- Institución:
- Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
- Repositorio:
- RED: Repositorio Educativo Digital UAO
- Idioma:
- spa
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:red.uao.edu.co:10614/11201
- Acceso en línea:
- http://hdl.handle.net/10614/11201
- Palabra clave:
- Economía internacional
International economic relations
Negocios internacionales
Densidad de Kernel
Distancia holística
Análisis factorial
International business
Kernel density
Factor analysis
Holistic distance
- Rights
- openAccess
- License
- Derechos Reservados - Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
| id |
REPOUAO2_6cd4f08150ebe972cdfbd5716346c3e7 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:red.uao.edu.co:10614/11201 |
| network_acronym_str |
REPOUAO2 |
| network_name_str |
RED: Repositorio Educativo Digital UAO |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Hacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales: el caso colombiano |
| dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Towards holistic version of distance in international business: the Colombian case |
| title |
Hacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales: el caso colombiano |
| spellingShingle |
Hacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales: el caso colombiano Economía internacional International economic relations Negocios internacionales Densidad de Kernel Distancia holística Análisis factorial International business Kernel density Factor analysis Holistic distance |
| title_short |
Hacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales: el caso colombiano |
| title_full |
Hacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales: el caso colombiano |
| title_fullStr |
Hacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales: el caso colombiano |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Hacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales: el caso colombiano |
| title_sort |
Hacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales: el caso colombiano |
| dc.creator.fl_str_mv |
Caicedo Marulanda , Carolina Pla Barber, Jose León-Darder, Fidel Mora Rodríguez, Jhon James |
| dc.contributor.author.none.fl_str_mv |
Caicedo Marulanda , Carolina Pla Barber, Jose León-Darder, Fidel Mora Rodríguez, Jhon James |
| dc.subject.armarc.spa.fl_str_mv |
Economía internacional |
| topic |
Economía internacional International economic relations Negocios internacionales Densidad de Kernel Distancia holística Análisis factorial International business Kernel density Factor analysis Holistic distance |
| dc.subject.armarc.eng.fl_str_mv |
International economic relations |
| dc.subject.proposal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Negocios internacionales Densidad de Kernel Distancia holística Análisis factorial |
| dc.subject.proposal.eng.fl_str_mv |
International business Kernel density Factor analysis Holistic distance |
| description |
Este artículo presenta nuevas estimaciones de distancia en los negocios internacionales entre Colombia y 57 países de Europa, América, Asia, África y Oceanía. El concepto de distancia que utilizamos trasciende el plano de lo institucional e incorpora tanto aspectos institucionales como aquellos que aún no han sido considerados en la literatura como el mercado laboral, la práctica mercantil y la innovación. De esta forma, a partir de la construcción de un índice sintético de distancia nosotros calculamos las distancias entre Colombia y los países de la muestra usando el concepto de distancia de Mahalanobis en las dimensiones aquí analizadas. Nuestros resultados muestran que si bien hay avances en la globalización sobre los negocios internacionales entre Colombia y los países de la muestra, todavía existen restricciones a las que se enfrentan las empresas colombianas que están interesadas en incursionar estos mercados buscando beneficiarse de los acuerdos de libre comercio |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-06 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-11T19:35:11Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-11T19:35:11Z |
| dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo de revista |
| dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 |
| dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.coar.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| dc.type.content.eng.fl_str_mv |
Text |
| dc.type.driver.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| dc.type.redcol.eng.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF |
| dc.type.version.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.issn.spa.fl_str_mv |
1886516X (en línea) |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10614/11201 |
| identifier_str_mv |
1886516X (en línea) |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10614/11201 |
| dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.citationendpage.none.fl_str_mv |
47 |
| dc.relation.citationstartpage.none.fl_str_mv |
24 |
| dc.relation.citationvolume.none.fl_str_mv |
23 |
| dc.relation.cites.spa.fl_str_mv |
Caicedo Marulanda, C., Pla Barber, J., León Darder, F., & Mora, J. J. (2017). Hacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales: el caso colombiano/Towards Holistic Version of Distance in International Business: The Colombian Case. Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa, 23, 24-47 |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal.spa.fl_str_mv |
Revista de métodos cuantitativos para la economía y la empresa |
| dc.relation.references.none.fl_str_mv |
Anderson, J. & Marcouiller, D. (2002): “Insecurity and the Pattern of Trade: An Empirical Investigation”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2): 342-352 Bae, J. & Salomon, R. (2010): “Institutional distance in international business research”, en Devinney, T., Pedersen, T. & Tihanyi, L. (eds.): The Past, Present and Future of International Business & Management (Advances in International Management, 23), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 327-349 Barkema, H., Bell, J. & Pennings, J. (1996): “Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning”, Strategic Management Journal, 17(2): 151-166 Bénassy-Quéré, A., Coupet, M. & Mayer, T. (2007): “Institutional Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment”, World Economy, 30(5): 764-782 Berry, H., Guillen, M. & Zhou, N. (2010): “An institutional approach to cross-national distance”, Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1460-1480 Berthelon, M. & Freund, C. (2008): “On the Conservation of Distance in International Trade”, Journal of International Economics, 75(2): 310-320 Burdenski, T. (2000): “Evaluating univariate, bivariate, and multivariate normality using graphical and statistical procedures”, Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 26(2): 15-28 Busenitz, L., Gómez, C. & Spencer, J. (2000): “Country Institutional Profiles: Unlocking Entrepreneurial Phenomena”, Academy of Management Journal, 43(5): 994-1003 Chang, Y-C., Kao, M-S. & Chiu, C-F. (2011): “How cultural distance influences entry mode choice: The contingent role of host country's governance quality”, Journal of Business Research, 65(8): 1160-1170 Cea D’Ancona, M. (2002): Análisis Multivariable Teoría y Práctica en la Investigación Social, Madrid: Editorial Síntesis Chao, M. & Kumar, V. (2010): “The impact of institutional distance on the international diversity-performance relationship”, Journal of World Business, 45(1): 93-103 Deardorff, A. (1987): “Why Do Governments Prefer Nontariff Barriers?", Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 26: 191-216 Deardorff, A. & Stern, R. (1985): Methods of Measurement of Non-Tariff Barriers, Geneva: UNCTAD De Groot, H.L.F., Linders, G-J., Rielveld, P. & Subramanian, U. (2004): “The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns”, Kyklos, 57(1): 103-123 Disdier, A-C. & Head, K. (2008): “The Puzzling Persistence of the Distance Effect on Bilateral Trade”, The Review of Economics and Statistic, 90(1): 37-48 Driffield, N. & Taylor, K. (2000): “FDI and the Labor Market: A review of the evidence and policy implications”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 16(3): 90-103 Drogendijka, R. & Slangen, A. (2006): “Hofstede, Schwartz, or managerial perceptions? The effects of different cultural distance measures on establishment mode choices by multinational enterprises”, International Business Review, 15(4): 361-380 Eriksson, K., Johanson, J., Majkgard, A. & Sharma, D. (1997): “Experiential Knowledge and Cost in the Internationalization Process”, Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2): 337-360 Fitzpatrick, G. & Modlin, M. (1986): Direct-line Distances: International Edition, Metuchen: Scarecrow Press Furman, J., Porter, M. & Stern, S. (2002): “The determinants of national innovative capacity”, Research Policy, 31(6): 899-933 Gaur, A., Delios, A. & Singh, K. (2007): “Institutional Environments, Staffing Strategies, and Subsidiary Performance”, Journal of Management, 33(4): 611-636 Ghemawat, P. & Altman, S. (2014): DHL Global Connectedness Index 2014, Deutsche Post DHL, Headquaters Ghemawat, P. (2001): “Distance Still Matters. The Hard Reality of Global Expansion”, Harvard Business Review, 79(8): 137-147 Globerman, S. & Shapiro, D. (2002): “Global Foreign Direct Investment Flows: The Role of Governance Infrastructure”, World Development, 30(11): 1899-1919 Hall, R. & Jones, Ch. (1999): “Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others?”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83-116 Hasan, I. & Tucci, C. (2010): “The innovation–economic growth nexus: Global evidence”, Research Policy, 39(10), 1264-1276 Hymer, S. (1960): The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment. Cambridge: MIT Press Inglehart, R. & Baker, W. (2000): “Modernization, Cultural Change and the Persistence of Traditional”, American Sociological Review, 65(1): 19-51 Izenman, A. & Sommer, C. (1988): “Philatelic mixtures and multimodal densities”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404): 941-953 Johanson, J. & Vahlne, J. (1977): “The Internationalization Process of the Firm-A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments”, Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23-32 Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations, Thousand Oaks: Sage Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Zoido-Lobatón, P. (1999): “Aggregating governance indicators”, Policy Research Working Paper, 2195: 39 pp. Knack, S. & Keefer, P. (1995): “Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures”, Economics & Politics, 7(3): 207-227 Kogut, B. & Singh, H. (1988): “The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode”, Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3): 411-432 Kostova, T. & Roth, K. (2002): “Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects”, Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 215-233 Kostova, T., Roth K. & Dacin, T. (2008): “Institutional Theory in the Study of Multinational Corporations: A Critique and New Directions”, Academy Management Review, 33(4): 994-1006 Kostova, T. & Zaheer, S. (1999): “Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise”, Academy of Management Review, 24(1): 64-81 Koukhartchouk, O. & Maurel, M. (2003): “Accession to the WTO and EU enlargement: what potential for trade increase?”, CEPR Discussion Paper, 3944, London: Centre for Economic Policy Research Krzanowski, W. J. (1988): Principles of Multivariate Analysis: A User’s Perspective, New York: Oxford University Press La Porta, R., López-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (1998): “Law and finance”, Journal of Political Economy, 106(6): 1113-1155 Mahalanobis, P. (1930): “On tests and measures of group divergence”, Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 26, 541-588 Mahalanobis, P. (1936): “On the generalized distance in statistics”, Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India, 2, 49-55 Mardia, K., Kent, J. & Bibby, J. (1979): Multivariate Analysis, London: Academic Press Markus, H. & Zajonc, R. (1985): “The cognitive perspective in social psychology”, en Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (eds.): The Handbook of Social Psychology, New York: Random House, pp. 137-229 Martin, X., Salomon, R. & Wu, Z. (2010): “The institutional determinants of agglomeration: a study in the global semiconductor industry”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(6): 1769-1800 Miller, S. & Parkhe, A. (2002): “Is there a Liability of Foreignness in Global Banking? An empirical test of Banks’ X-Efficiency”, Strategic Management Journal, 23(1): 55-75 Mitchell, A. & Krzanowski, W. (1985): “The Mahalanobis distance and elliptic distributions”, Biometrika, 72(2): 464-467 Mora, J.J. & Nuñez, J. (2009): “Economic convergence of income distribution worldwide from 1986 to 2000”, Journal of Economic Studies, 36(6): 675-691 Morosini, P., Shane, S. & Singh, H. (1998): “National cultural distance and cross-border acquisition performance”, Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 137-158 North, D. (1990): “Institutions”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97-112 North, D. (1995): “Five Propositions about Institutional Change”, en Knight, J. & Sened, I. (eds.): Explaining Social Institutions, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 15-26 OECD (2008): Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and user guide, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Olson, M. (1996): “Big Bill a Left on the Sidewalk: Why Some Nations are Rich and Others Poor”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(2): 3-24 Oxley, J. & Yeung, B. (2001): “E-commerce readiness: Institutional environment and international competitiveness”, Journal of International Business Studies, 32(4): 705-723 Pla-Barber, J. & León-Darder, F. (2004): Dirección de Empresas Internacionales. Madrid: Prentice Hall Perkins, S. (2014): “When does prior experience pay? Institutional experience and the case of multinational corporation”, Adminnistrative Science Quaterly, 59(1): 145-181 Rockefeller College (2007): “PAD 705 Handout: Factor Analysis”, disponible en: http://www.albany.edu/faculty/kretheme/PAD705/SupportMat/FactorAnalysisTheory.pdf Salgado-Ugarte, I., Shimizu, M. & Taniuchi, T. (1997): “Nonparametric assessment of multimodality for univariate data”, Stata Technical Bulletin, 38: 27-35 Seber, G. (1984): Multivariate observations. New York: Wiley Scott, W. (1995): Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Sethi, D. & Guisinger, S. (2002): “Liability of foreignness to competitive advantage: How multinational enterprises cope with the international business environment”, Journal of International Management, 8: 223-240 Silverman, B. (1986): Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, London: Chapman & Hall Shaxby, J.H. (1945): “Great circles routes”, Geography, 30(4): 112-115 Shenkar, O. (2001): “Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences”, Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3): 519-535 Sokal, R. (1979): “Testing Statistical Significance of Geographic Variation Patterns”, Systematic Zoology, 28(2): 227-232 Wei, S-J. (2000): “Natural openness and good government”, NBER Working Paper no. 7765: 32 pp. Wheeler, D. & Mody, A. (1992): “International investment location decisions: The case of U.S. firms”, Journal of International Economics, 33(1-2): 57-76 Whitley, R. (1992): Business systems in East Asia: Firms, markets, and societies, London: Sage Xu, D., Pan, Y. & Beamish, P. (2004): “The Effect of Regulative and Normative Distances on MNE Ownership and Expatriate Strategies”, Management International Review, 44(3): 285-307 Zelner B., Henisz W. & Holburn, G. (2009): “Contentious Implementation and Retrenchment in Neoliberal Policy Reform: The Global Electric Power Industry, 1989-2001”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(3): 379-41 |
| dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Derechos Reservados - Universidad Autónoma de Occidente |
| dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| dc.rights.uri.eng.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.accessrights.eng.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.rights.creativecommons.spa.fl_str_mv |
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos Reservados - Universidad Autónoma de Occidente https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.eng.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.format.extent.none.fl_str_mv |
24 páginas |
| dc.coverage.spatial.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Autónoma de Occidente. Calle 25 115-85. Km 2 vía Cali-Jamundí Colombia |
| dc.coverage.spatial.spa.fl_str_mv |
Europa |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Pablo de Olavide |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Pablo de Olavide |
| institution |
Universidad Autónoma de Occidente |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/0fd8d98d-47c5-4045-a007-90b623cd7fd5/download https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/610fd7b9-21dd-4c42-b8d8-e904ba10efb7/download https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/b69106b1-0840-43ba-9722-cf95bf51b6eb/download https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/7c5dad86-f269-4da2-9466-703fccbbfdce/download https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/22624377-c6db-4e2a-b2a2-dfd9838b63e3/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 20b5ba22b1117f71589c7318baa2c560 99772573416c98578daf4122b808209a 7ae51c3bf464c90fe549f4f381ca4701 7f51454f1109ad0f705b2eeefafcda0c |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Digital Universidad Autonoma de Occidente |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@uao.edu.co |
| _version_ |
1828230191760015360 |
| spelling |
Caicedo Marulanda , Carolina virtual::3072-1Pla Barber, Jose15e5f9a6a98c14daca3964d9ee4986d2León-Darder, Fidel69f69d4deec17d66dd58974a98ca66fdMora Rodríguez, Jhon James3fe7d9d6da21ffe3ca03c3a7b1f8c161Universidad Autónoma de Occidente. Calle 25 115-85. Km 2 vía Cali-JamundíColombiaEuropa2019-10-11T19:35:11Z2019-10-11T19:35:11Z2017-061886516X (en línea)http://hdl.handle.net/10614/11201Este artículo presenta nuevas estimaciones de distancia en los negocios internacionales entre Colombia y 57 países de Europa, América, Asia, África y Oceanía. El concepto de distancia que utilizamos trasciende el plano de lo institucional e incorpora tanto aspectos institucionales como aquellos que aún no han sido considerados en la literatura como el mercado laboral, la práctica mercantil y la innovación. De esta forma, a partir de la construcción de un índice sintético de distancia nosotros calculamos las distancias entre Colombia y los países de la muestra usando el concepto de distancia de Mahalanobis en las dimensiones aquí analizadas. Nuestros resultados muestran que si bien hay avances en la globalización sobre los negocios internacionales entre Colombia y los países de la muestra, todavía existen restricciones a las que se enfrentan las empresas colombianas que están interesadas en incursionar estos mercados buscando beneficiarse de los acuerdos de libre comercioThis article presents new estimations of the distance in international business between Colombia and 57 countries in Europe, America, Asia, Africa and Oceania. The concept of distance that we use transcends the institutional level and incorporates both institutional aspects and those that have not yet been considered in the literature such as labor market, business practice and innovation. In this way, we build a holistic distance index and discuss the results for the specific case of Colombia. Thus, from the construction of a synthetic index of distance, we calculated the distances between Colombia and the countries of the sample using the Mahalanobis distance in the dimensions analyzed here. Our results show that although there is progress in the globalization of international business between Colombia and the countries of the sample there are still restrictions faced by Colombian companies that are interested in entering these markets seeking to benefit from the free trade agreementsapplication/pdf24 páginasspaUniversidad Pablo de OlavideDerechos Reservados - Universidad Autónoma de Occidentehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Hacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales: el caso colombianoTowards holistic version of distance in international business: the Colombian caseArtículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Economía internacionalInternational economic relationsNegocios internacionalesDensidad de KernelDistancia holísticaAnálisis factorialInternational businessKernel densityFactor analysisHolistic distance472423Caicedo Marulanda, C., Pla Barber, J., León Darder, F., & Mora, J. J. (2017). Hacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales: el caso colombiano/Towards Holistic Version of Distance in International Business: The Colombian Case. Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa, 23, 24-47Revista de métodos cuantitativos para la economía y la empresaAnderson, J. & Marcouiller, D. (2002): “Insecurity and the Pattern of Trade: An Empirical Investigation”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2): 342-352Bae, J. & Salomon, R. (2010): “Institutional distance in international business research”, en Devinney, T., Pedersen, T. & Tihanyi, L. (eds.): The Past, Present and Future of International Business & Management (Advances in International Management, 23), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 327-349Barkema, H., Bell, J. & Pennings, J. (1996): “Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning”, Strategic Management Journal, 17(2): 151-166Bénassy-Quéré, A., Coupet, M. & Mayer, T. (2007): “Institutional Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment”, World Economy, 30(5): 764-782Berry, H., Guillen, M. & Zhou, N. (2010): “An institutional approach to cross-national distance”, Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1460-1480Berthelon, M. & Freund, C. (2008): “On the Conservation of Distance in International Trade”, Journal of International Economics, 75(2): 310-320Burdenski, T. (2000): “Evaluating univariate, bivariate, and multivariate normality using graphical and statistical procedures”, Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 26(2): 15-28Busenitz, L., Gómez, C. & Spencer, J. (2000): “Country Institutional Profiles: Unlocking Entrepreneurial Phenomena”, Academy of Management Journal, 43(5): 994-1003Chang, Y-C., Kao, M-S. & Chiu, C-F. (2011): “How cultural distance influences entry mode choice: The contingent role of host country's governance quality”, Journal of Business Research, 65(8): 1160-1170Cea D’Ancona, M. (2002): Análisis Multivariable Teoría y Práctica en la Investigación Social, Madrid: Editorial SíntesisChao, M. & Kumar, V. (2010): “The impact of institutional distance on the international diversity-performance relationship”, Journal of World Business, 45(1): 93-103Deardorff, A. (1987): “Why Do Governments Prefer Nontariff Barriers?", Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 26: 191-216Deardorff, A. & Stern, R. (1985): Methods of Measurement of Non-Tariff Barriers, Geneva: UNCTADDe Groot, H.L.F., Linders, G-J., Rielveld, P. & Subramanian, U. (2004): “The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns”, Kyklos, 57(1): 103-123Disdier, A-C. & Head, K. (2008): “The Puzzling Persistence of the Distance Effect on Bilateral Trade”, The Review of Economics and Statistic, 90(1): 37-48Driffield, N. & Taylor, K. (2000): “FDI and the Labor Market: A review of the evidence and policy implications”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 16(3): 90-103Drogendijka, R. & Slangen, A. (2006): “Hofstede, Schwartz, or managerial perceptions? The effects of different cultural distance measures on establishment mode choices by multinational enterprises”, International Business Review, 15(4): 361-380Eriksson, K., Johanson, J., Majkgard, A. & Sharma, D. (1997): “Experiential Knowledge and Cost in the Internationalization Process”, Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2): 337-360Fitzpatrick, G. & Modlin, M. (1986): Direct-line Distances: International Edition, Metuchen: Scarecrow PressFurman, J., Porter, M. & Stern, S. (2002): “The determinants of national innovative capacity”, Research Policy, 31(6): 899-933Gaur, A., Delios, A. & Singh, K. (2007): “Institutional Environments, Staffing Strategies, and Subsidiary Performance”, Journal of Management, 33(4): 611-636Ghemawat, P. & Altman, S. (2014): DHL Global Connectedness Index 2014, Deutsche Post DHL, HeadquatersGhemawat, P. (2001): “Distance Still Matters. The Hard Reality of Global Expansion”, Harvard Business Review, 79(8): 137-147Globerman, S. & Shapiro, D. (2002): “Global Foreign Direct Investment Flows: The Role of Governance Infrastructure”, World Development, 30(11): 1899-1919Hall, R. & Jones, Ch. (1999): “Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others?”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83-116Hasan, I. & Tucci, C. (2010): “The innovation–economic growth nexus: Global evidence”, Research Policy, 39(10), 1264-1276Hymer, S. (1960): The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment. Cambridge: MIT PressInglehart, R. & Baker, W. (2000): “Modernization, Cultural Change and the Persistence of Traditional”, American Sociological Review, 65(1): 19-51Izenman, A. & Sommer, C. (1988): “Philatelic mixtures and multimodal densities”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404): 941-953Johanson, J. & Vahlne, J. (1977): “The Internationalization Process of the Firm-A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments”, Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23-32Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations, Thousand Oaks: SageKaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Zoido-Lobatón, P. (1999): “Aggregating governance indicators”, Policy Research Working Paper, 2195: 39 pp.Knack, S. & Keefer, P. (1995): “Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures”, Economics & Politics, 7(3): 207-227Kogut, B. & Singh, H. (1988): “The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode”, Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3): 411-432Kostova, T. & Roth, K. (2002): “Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects”, Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 215-233Kostova, T., Roth K. & Dacin, T. (2008): “Institutional Theory in the Study of Multinational Corporations: A Critique and New Directions”, Academy Management Review, 33(4): 994-1006Kostova, T. & Zaheer, S. (1999): “Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise”, Academy of Management Review, 24(1): 64-81Koukhartchouk, O. & Maurel, M. (2003): “Accession to the WTO and EU enlargement: what potential for trade increase?”, CEPR Discussion Paper, 3944, London: Centre for Economic Policy ResearchKrzanowski, W. J. (1988): Principles of Multivariate Analysis: A User’s Perspective, New York: Oxford University PressLa Porta, R., López-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (1998): “Law and finance”, Journal of Political Economy, 106(6): 1113-1155Mahalanobis, P. (1930): “On tests and measures of group divergence”, Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 26, 541-588Mahalanobis, P. (1936): “On the generalized distance in statistics”, Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India, 2, 49-55Mardia, K., Kent, J. & Bibby, J. (1979): Multivariate Analysis, London: Academic PressMarkus, H. & Zajonc, R. (1985): “The cognitive perspective in social psychology”, en Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (eds.): The Handbook of Social Psychology, New York: Random House, pp. 137-229Martin, X., Salomon, R. & Wu, Z. (2010): “The institutional determinants of agglomeration: a study in the global semiconductor industry”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(6): 1769-1800Miller, S. & Parkhe, A. (2002): “Is there a Liability of Foreignness in Global Banking? An empirical test of Banks’ X-Efficiency”, Strategic Management Journal, 23(1): 55-75Mitchell, A. & Krzanowski, W. (1985): “The Mahalanobis distance and elliptic distributions”, Biometrika, 72(2): 464-467Mora, J.J. & Nuñez, J. (2009): “Economic convergence of income distribution worldwide from 1986 to 2000”, Journal of Economic Studies, 36(6): 675-691Morosini, P., Shane, S. & Singh, H. (1998): “National cultural distance and cross-border acquisition performance”, Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 137-158North, D. (1990): “Institutions”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97-112North, D. (1995): “Five Propositions about Institutional Change”, en Knight, J. & Sened, I. (eds.): Explaining Social Institutions, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 15-26OECD (2008): Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and user guide, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)Olson, M. (1996): “Big Bill a Left on the Sidewalk: Why Some Nations are Rich and Others Poor”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(2): 3-24Oxley, J. & Yeung, B. (2001): “E-commerce readiness: Institutional environment and international competitiveness”, Journal of International Business Studies, 32(4): 705-723Pla-Barber, J. & León-Darder, F. (2004): Dirección de Empresas Internacionales. Madrid: Prentice HallPerkins, S. (2014): “When does prior experience pay? Institutional experience and the case of multinational corporation”, Adminnistrative Science Quaterly, 59(1): 145-181Rockefeller College (2007): “PAD 705 Handout: Factor Analysis”, disponible en: http://www.albany.edu/faculty/kretheme/PAD705/SupportMat/FactorAnalysisTheory.pdfSalgado-Ugarte, I., Shimizu, M. & Taniuchi, T. (1997): “Nonparametric assessment of multimodality for univariate data”, Stata Technical Bulletin, 38: 27-35Seber, G. (1984): Multivariate observations. New York: WileyScott, W. (1995): Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks: SageSethi, D. & Guisinger, S. (2002): “Liability of foreignness to competitive advantage: How multinational enterprises cope with the international business environment”, Journal of International Management, 8: 223-240Silverman, B. (1986): Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, London: Chapman & HallShaxby, J.H. (1945): “Great circles routes”, Geography, 30(4): 112-115Shenkar, O. (2001): “Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences”, Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3): 519-535Sokal, R. (1979): “Testing Statistical Significance of Geographic Variation Patterns”, Systematic Zoology, 28(2): 227-232Wei, S-J. (2000): “Natural openness and good government”, NBER Working Paper no. 7765: 32 pp.Wheeler, D. & Mody, A. (1992): “International investment location decisions: The case of U.S. firms”, Journal of International Economics, 33(1-2): 57-76Whitley, R. (1992): Business systems in East Asia: Firms, markets, and societies, London: SageXu, D., Pan, Y. & Beamish, P. (2004): “The Effect of Regulative and Normative Distances on MNE Ownership and Expatriate Strategies”, Management International Review, 44(3): 285-307Zelner B., Henisz W. & Holburn, G. (2009): “Contentious Implementation and Retrenchment in Neoliberal Policy Reform: The Global Electric Power Industry, 1989-2001”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(3): 379-41Publicationa183c021-f01e-4ba4-a5c8-004ee18b06b7virtual::3072-1a183c021-f01e-4ba4-a5c8-004ee18b06b7virtual::3072-1https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=i12K1DcAAAAJ&hl=esvirtual::3072-10000-0003-0513-7578virtual::3072-1https://scienti.minciencias.gov.co/cvlac/visualizador/generarCurriculoCv.do?cod_rh=0000022753virtual::3072-1CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/0fd8d98d-47c5-4045-a007-90b623cd7fd5/download4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81665https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/610fd7b9-21dd-4c42-b8d8-e904ba10efb7/download20b5ba22b1117f71589c7318baa2c560MD53ORIGINAL00347_Hacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales - el caso colombiano.pdf00347_Hacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales - el caso colombiano.pdfArchivo texto completo del artículoapplication/pdf360767https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/b69106b1-0840-43ba-9722-cf95bf51b6eb/download99772573416c98578daf4122b808209aMD54TEXT00347_Hacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales - el caso colombiano.pdf.txt00347_Hacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales - el caso colombiano.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain74353https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/7c5dad86-f269-4da2-9466-703fccbbfdce/download7ae51c3bf464c90fe549f4f381ca4701MD55THUMBNAIL00347_Hacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales - el caso colombiano.pdf.jpg00347_Hacia una visión holística de la distancia en los negocios internacionales - el caso colombiano.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg10058https://red.uao.edu.co/bitstreams/22624377-c6db-4e2a-b2a2-dfd9838b63e3/download7f51454f1109ad0f705b2eeefafcda0cMD5610614/11201oai:red.uao.edu.co:10614/112012024-03-08 14:15:08.028https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Derechos Reservados - Universidad Autónoma de Occidenteopen.accesshttps://red.uao.edu.coRepositorio Digital Universidad Autonoma de Occidenterepositorio@uao.edu.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 |