Recognizing, normalizing and articulating: an approach to highlight plural values of water ecosystem services in Colombia

The dialectical relationship between ecosystems and society is complex; therefore, holistic approaches are required to address this complexity. This view also stands out in the ecosystem services valuation field, where different scholars and global platforms have drawn attention to the need to incor...

Full description

Autores:
Suarez, Andrés
Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar Augusto
Arias-Arévalo, Paola
Florez Yepes, Gloria Yaneth
Arciniegas, Nicolas
Vargas-Marín, Luis A.
Marulanda, Alejandro
Ramírez, Jesica
Castro Escobar, Edisson Stiven
Bastidas, Juan C.
Blanco, David
Tipo de recurso:
Article of investigation
Fecha de publicación:
2022
Institución:
Corporación Universidad de la Costa
Repositorio:
REDICUC - Repositorio CUC
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repositorio.cuc.edu.co:11323/9595
Acceso en línea:
https://hdl.handle.net/11323/9595
https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/
Palabra clave:
Nature contributions to people
Plural valuation
Social participation
Integration
Decision making
Rights
openAccess
License
Atribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0)
Description
Summary:The dialectical relationship between ecosystems and society is complex; therefore, holistic approaches are required to address this complexity. This view also stands out in the ecosystem services valuation field, where different scholars and global platforms have drawn attention to the need to incorporate plural valuation initiatives at decision-making. In this sense, through a comprehensive design, we conducted a multi-layered valuation of ecosystem services, and we highlighted multiple values in two areas of the province of Caldas, Colombia. We proposed a three-phase valuation process called Recognizing, Normalizing and Articulating values. Then, in cooperation with the regional environmental authority, we obtained different water-related ecosystem services values. Our results showed some warnings: first, we found mismatches between ecosystem services values; second, people assigned high values to ecosystems but the actual capacity of ecosystems to support ES is low. Finally, monetary values were marginal compared to social and ecological values. We conclude by saying that the more strata are assessed, the more values appear in the valuation scenarios, and those values could be conflicting. Our results have political implications, since they highlight the need to incorporate plural values as a fundamental tool for planning and land use in real scenarios where conflicts of interest and values are evident.