Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer

Background: Although the current literature has shown an increasing interest in surgical treatment of gastric cancer (GC) in older adults in recent years, there is still no consensus on proper management in this subgroup of patients. This study was designed with the objective of evaluating the curre...

Full description

Autores:
Tipo de recurso:
Fecha de publicación:
2024
Institución:
Universidad del Rosario
Repositorio:
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
Idioma:
eng
OAI Identifier:
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/44823
Acceso en línea:
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247678
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/44823
Palabra clave:
Gastric cancer
Lymphadenectomy
Lymph node dissection
Older adults
Prognosis
Rights
License
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
id EDOCUR2_f6c49f3507fa014f58adccef89269a60
oai_identifier_str oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/44823
network_acronym_str EDOCUR2
network_name_str Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
repository_id_str
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer
title Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer
spellingShingle Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer
Gastric cancer
Lymphadenectomy
Lymph node dissection
Older adults
Prognosis
title_short Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer
title_full Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer
title_fullStr Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer
title_sort Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv Gastric cancer
Lymphadenectomy
Lymph node dissection
Older adults
Prognosis
topic Gastric cancer
Lymphadenectomy
Lymph node dissection
Older adults
Prognosis
description Background: Although the current literature has shown an increasing interest in surgical treatment of gastric cancer (GC) in older adults in recent years, there is still no consensus on proper management in this subgroup of patients. This study was designed with the objective of evaluating the current evidence that compares limited lymph node dissection with extended lymph node dissection in older adult patients (?65 years) coursing with resectable GC. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane library, and ScienceDirect was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All studies before 2018 were selected using a systematic review by Mogal et al. Studies were eligible for this meta-analysis if they were randomized controlled trials or non-randomized comparative studies comparing limited lymph node dissection versus extended lymph node dissection in patients with resectable GC taken to gastrectomy. Results: Seventeen studies and a total of 5056 patients were included. There were not any statistically significant differences in OS (HR = 1.04, CI95% = 0.72–1.51), RFS (HR = 0.92, CI95% = 0.62–1.38), or CSS (HR = 1.24, CI95% = 0.74–2.10) between older adult patients taken to limited and extended lymphadenectomy in addition to gastrectomy as the current surgical treatment for GC. Although a higher rate of major complications was observed in the extended lymphadenectomy group, this difference was not statistically significant in incidence between both groups of patients (OR = 1.92, CI95% = 0.75–4.91). Conclusions: Limited lymphadenectomy must be considered as the better recommendation for surgical treatment for GC in older adult patients, considering the oncological outcomes and lower rates of complications compared with more radical lymph node dissections.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv 2024-12-01
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv 2024-12-01
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2025-01-26T18:32:23Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2025-01-26T18:32:23Z
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv article
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.identifier.doi.spa.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247678
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/44823
url https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247678
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/44823
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv Journal of Clinical Medicine
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv Abierto (Texto Completo)
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Abierto (Texto Completo)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv Journal of Clinical Medicine
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv Journal of Clinical Medicine
institution Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv instname:Universidad del Rosario
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/8e43f6f2-d244-4999-b110-eb45ace79bc5/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/c1f1356c-5a9c-46d2-a0a6-119632d1df82/download
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/366a8f1a-8f58-4c81-8c3e-13cc1aea1859/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv d1cfc02014a282b3cf471642e39f0a54
83657259fe04e676a109d369452d754a
48303578cb643428d0ab3e85128ac4d4
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio institucional EdocUR
repository.mail.fl_str_mv edocur@urosario.edu.co
_version_ 1831928314353156096
spelling 4ba1b070-a9dd-47d0-b94d-5cfea228150d8bb7e42b-d36c-4d2c-bde2-8b88c9107cbcb61abc6b-284c-4829-be5b-a73a2f0ae89a73c35d20-4663-4358-84e7-d8a4607be9c32ce471be-c87d-4b6d-aae4-8488f617adcf31ea41a9-96db-4354-96df-7fce153489bd7f6efc1a-d31d-4764-9d5b-8583d25c35acdb652cff-2266-48b5-afb7-7694a84bbca932298566002025-01-26T18:32:23Z2025-01-26T18:32:23Z2024-12-012024-12-01Background: Although the current literature has shown an increasing interest in surgical treatment of gastric cancer (GC) in older adults in recent years, there is still no consensus on proper management in this subgroup of patients. This study was designed with the objective of evaluating the current evidence that compares limited lymph node dissection with extended lymph node dissection in older adult patients (?65 years) coursing with resectable GC. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane library, and ScienceDirect was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All studies before 2018 were selected using a systematic review by Mogal et al. Studies were eligible for this meta-analysis if they were randomized controlled trials or non-randomized comparative studies comparing limited lymph node dissection versus extended lymph node dissection in patients with resectable GC taken to gastrectomy. Results: Seventeen studies and a total of 5056 patients were included. There were not any statistically significant differences in OS (HR = 1.04, CI95% = 0.72–1.51), RFS (HR = 0.92, CI95% = 0.62–1.38), or CSS (HR = 1.24, CI95% = 0.74–2.10) between older adult patients taken to limited and extended lymphadenectomy in addition to gastrectomy as the current surgical treatment for GC. Although a higher rate of major complications was observed in the extended lymphadenectomy group, this difference was not statistically significant in incidence between both groups of patients (OR = 1.92, CI95% = 0.75–4.91). Conclusions: Limited lymphadenectomy must be considered as the better recommendation for surgical treatment for GC in older adult patients, considering the oncological outcomes and lower rates of complications compared with more radical lymph node dissections.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247678https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/44823engJournal of Clinical MedicineJournal of Clinical MedicineAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalAbierto (Texto Completo)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Journal of Clinical Medicineinstname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURGastric cancerLymphadenectomyLymph node dissectionOlder adultsPrognosisLymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric CancerarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Ramírez-Giraldo, CamiloAvendaño-Morales, VioletaVan-Londoño, IsabellaMelo-Leal, Daniela Camargo-Areyanes, María IsabelVenegas Sanabria, Luis Carlos Vargas Vargas, Juan PabloAguirre Salamanca, Edgar JavierIsaza Restrepo, AndrésORIGINALLymph_Node_Dissection_of_Choice_in_Older_Adult_Patients_with_Gastric_Cancer.pdfapplication/pdf3843825https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/8e43f6f2-d244-4999-b110-eb45ace79bc5/downloadd1cfc02014a282b3cf471642e39f0a54MD51TEXTLymph_Node_Dissection_of_Choice_in_Older_Adult_Patients_with_Gastric_Cancer.pdf.txtLymph_Node_Dissection_of_Choice_in_Older_Adult_Patients_with_Gastric_Cancer.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain91110https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/c1f1356c-5a9c-46d2-a0a6-119632d1df82/download83657259fe04e676a109d369452d754aMD52THUMBNAILLymph_Node_Dissection_of_Choice_in_Older_Adult_Patients_with_Gastric_Cancer.pdf.jpgLymph_Node_Dissection_of_Choice_in_Older_Adult_Patients_with_Gastric_Cancer.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4902https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/366a8f1a-8f58-4c81-8c3e-13cc1aea1859/download48303578cb643428d0ab3e85128ac4d4MD5310336/44823oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/448232025-02-27 15:31:39.579http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttps://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co