Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer
Background: Although the current literature has shown an increasing interest in surgical treatment of gastric cancer (GC) in older adults in recent years, there is still no consensus on proper management in this subgroup of patients. This study was designed with the objective of evaluating the curre...
- Autores:
- Tipo de recurso:
- Fecha de publicación:
- 2024
- Institución:
- Universidad del Rosario
- Repositorio:
- Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario
- Idioma:
- eng
- OAI Identifier:
- oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/44823
- Acceso en línea:
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247678
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/44823
- Palabra clave:
- Gastric cancer
Lymphadenectomy
Lymph node dissection
Older adults
Prognosis
- Rights
- License
- Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
id |
EDOCUR2_f6c49f3507fa014f58adccef89269a60 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/44823 |
network_acronym_str |
EDOCUR2 |
network_name_str |
Repositorio EdocUR - U. Rosario |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.spa.fl_str_mv |
Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer |
title |
Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer |
spellingShingle |
Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer Gastric cancer Lymphadenectomy Lymph node dissection Older adults Prognosis |
title_short |
Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer |
title_full |
Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer |
title_fullStr |
Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer |
title_sort |
Lymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer |
dc.subject.spa.fl_str_mv |
Gastric cancer Lymphadenectomy Lymph node dissection Older adults Prognosis |
topic |
Gastric cancer Lymphadenectomy Lymph node dissection Older adults Prognosis |
description |
Background: Although the current literature has shown an increasing interest in surgical treatment of gastric cancer (GC) in older adults in recent years, there is still no consensus on proper management in this subgroup of patients. This study was designed with the objective of evaluating the current evidence that compares limited lymph node dissection with extended lymph node dissection in older adult patients (?65 years) coursing with resectable GC. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane library, and ScienceDirect was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All studies before 2018 were selected using a systematic review by Mogal et al. Studies were eligible for this meta-analysis if they were randomized controlled trials or non-randomized comparative studies comparing limited lymph node dissection versus extended lymph node dissection in patients with resectable GC taken to gastrectomy. Results: Seventeen studies and a total of 5056 patients were included. There were not any statistically significant differences in OS (HR = 1.04, CI95% = 0.72–1.51), RFS (HR = 0.92, CI95% = 0.62–1.38), or CSS (HR = 1.24, CI95% = 0.74–2.10) between older adult patients taken to limited and extended lymphadenectomy in addition to gastrectomy as the current surgical treatment for GC. Although a higher rate of major complications was observed in the extended lymphadenectomy group, this difference was not statistically significant in incidence between both groups of patients (OR = 1.92, CI95% = 0.75–4.91). Conclusions: Limited lymphadenectomy must be considered as the better recommendation for surgical treatment for GC in older adult patients, considering the oncological outcomes and lower rates of complications compared with more radical lymph node dissections. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.created.spa.fl_str_mv |
2024-12-01 |
dc.date.issued.spa.fl_str_mv |
2024-12-01 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-01-26T18:32:23Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-01-26T18:32:23Z |
dc.type.spa.fl_str_mv |
article |
dc.type.coarversion.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
dc.type.spa.spa.fl_str_mv |
Artículo |
dc.identifier.doi.spa.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247678 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/44823 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247678 https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/44823 |
dc.language.iso.spa.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.spa.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Clinical Medicine |
dc.rights.spa.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International |
dc.rights.coar.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.rights.acceso.spa.fl_str_mv |
Abierto (Texto Completo) |
dc.rights.uri.spa.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Abierto (Texto Completo) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
dc.format.mimetype.spa.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.spa.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Clinical Medicine |
dc.source.spa.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Clinical Medicine |
institution |
Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.instname.spa.fl_str_mv |
instname:Universidad del Rosario |
dc.source.reponame.spa.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/8e43f6f2-d244-4999-b110-eb45ace79bc5/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/c1f1356c-5a9c-46d2-a0a6-119632d1df82/download https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/366a8f1a-8f58-4c81-8c3e-13cc1aea1859/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
d1cfc02014a282b3cf471642e39f0a54 83657259fe04e676a109d369452d754a 48303578cb643428d0ab3e85128ac4d4 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio institucional EdocUR |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
edocur@urosario.edu.co |
_version_ |
1831928314353156096 |
spelling |
4ba1b070-a9dd-47d0-b94d-5cfea228150d8bb7e42b-d36c-4d2c-bde2-8b88c9107cbcb61abc6b-284c-4829-be5b-a73a2f0ae89a73c35d20-4663-4358-84e7-d8a4607be9c32ce471be-c87d-4b6d-aae4-8488f617adcf31ea41a9-96db-4354-96df-7fce153489bd7f6efc1a-d31d-4764-9d5b-8583d25c35acdb652cff-2266-48b5-afb7-7694a84bbca932298566002025-01-26T18:32:23Z2025-01-26T18:32:23Z2024-12-012024-12-01Background: Although the current literature has shown an increasing interest in surgical treatment of gastric cancer (GC) in older adults in recent years, there is still no consensus on proper management in this subgroup of patients. This study was designed with the objective of evaluating the current evidence that compares limited lymph node dissection with extended lymph node dissection in older adult patients (?65 years) coursing with resectable GC. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane library, and ScienceDirect was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All studies before 2018 were selected using a systematic review by Mogal et al. Studies were eligible for this meta-analysis if they were randomized controlled trials or non-randomized comparative studies comparing limited lymph node dissection versus extended lymph node dissection in patients with resectable GC taken to gastrectomy. Results: Seventeen studies and a total of 5056 patients were included. There were not any statistically significant differences in OS (HR = 1.04, CI95% = 0.72–1.51), RFS (HR = 0.92, CI95% = 0.62–1.38), or CSS (HR = 1.24, CI95% = 0.74–2.10) between older adult patients taken to limited and extended lymphadenectomy in addition to gastrectomy as the current surgical treatment for GC. Although a higher rate of major complications was observed in the extended lymphadenectomy group, this difference was not statistically significant in incidence between both groups of patients (OR = 1.92, CI95% = 0.75–4.91). Conclusions: Limited lymphadenectomy must be considered as the better recommendation for surgical treatment for GC in older adult patients, considering the oncological outcomes and lower rates of complications compared with more radical lymph node dissections.application/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247678https://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/44823engJournal of Clinical MedicineJournal of Clinical MedicineAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalAbierto (Texto Completo)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Journal of Clinical Medicineinstname:Universidad del Rosarioreponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocURGastric cancerLymphadenectomyLymph node dissectionOlder adultsPrognosisLymph Node Dissection of Choice in Older Adult Patients with Gastric CancerarticleArtículohttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Ramírez-Giraldo, CamiloAvendaño-Morales, VioletaVan-Londoño, IsabellaMelo-Leal, Daniela Camargo-Areyanes, María IsabelVenegas Sanabria, Luis Carlos Vargas Vargas, Juan PabloAguirre Salamanca, Edgar JavierIsaza Restrepo, AndrésORIGINALLymph_Node_Dissection_of_Choice_in_Older_Adult_Patients_with_Gastric_Cancer.pdfapplication/pdf3843825https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/8e43f6f2-d244-4999-b110-eb45ace79bc5/downloadd1cfc02014a282b3cf471642e39f0a54MD51TEXTLymph_Node_Dissection_of_Choice_in_Older_Adult_Patients_with_Gastric_Cancer.pdf.txtLymph_Node_Dissection_of_Choice_in_Older_Adult_Patients_with_Gastric_Cancer.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain91110https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/c1f1356c-5a9c-46d2-a0a6-119632d1df82/download83657259fe04e676a109d369452d754aMD52THUMBNAILLymph_Node_Dissection_of_Choice_in_Older_Adult_Patients_with_Gastric_Cancer.pdf.jpgLymph_Node_Dissection_of_Choice_in_Older_Adult_Patients_with_Gastric_Cancer.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg4902https://repository.urosario.edu.co/bitstreams/366a8f1a-8f58-4c81-8c3e-13cc1aea1859/download48303578cb643428d0ab3e85128ac4d4MD5310336/44823oai:repository.urosario.edu.co:10336/448232025-02-27 15:31:39.579http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttps://repository.urosario.edu.coRepositorio institucional EdocURedocur@urosario.edu.co |