Violence in society

The recent interest in the sociology of violence has arisen at the same time that western societies are being urged to consider the profound social crisis provoked by global financial turmoil. Social changes demand the evo-lution of sociological practices.The analysis herein proposed, based on the s...

Full description

Autores:

Tipo de recurso:

Fecha de publicación:: 2014

Institución:: Corporación Universitaria Americana

Repositorio:: Repositorio Corporación Universitaria Americana

Idioma:: eng

id	Americana2_704f0254352b40e156fbc8bb4cc051fc
oai_identifier_str	oai:repositorio.americana.edu.co:001/482
network_acronym_str	Americana2
network_name_str	Repositorio Corporación Universitaria Americana
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv	Violence in society Violence in society
title	Violence in society
spellingShingle	Violence in society Social theory Violence Women’s movements Taboo Society State Teoría social Violencia Movimietos feministas Tabú Sociedad Estado
title_short	Violence in society
title_full	Violence in society
title_fullStr	Violence in society
title_full_unstemmed	Violence in society
title_sort	Violence in society
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv	Sello editorial Coruniamericana
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv	Social theory Violence Women’s movements Taboo Society State Teoría social Violencia Movimietos feministas Tabú Sociedad Estado
topic	Social theory Violence Women’s movements Taboo Society State Teoría social Violencia Movimietos feministas Tabú Sociedad Estado
description	The recent interest in the sociology of violence has arisen at the same time that western societies are being urged to consider the profound social crisis provoked by global financial turmoil. Social changes demand the evo-lution of sociological practices.The analysis herein proposed, based on the studies of M. Wieviorka, La Violence (2005), and of R. Collins, Violence: A Micro-sociological Theory (2008), concludes that violence is subject to sociological treatments cen-tered on the aggressors, on the struggles for power and on male gender. There is a lack of connection between prac-tical proposals for violence prevention and the sociol-ogy of violence. It is accepted that violence as a subject of study has the potential, as well as the theoretical and social centrality, to promote the debate necessary to bring social theory up to date. This process is more likely to oc-cur in periods of social transformation, when sociology is open to considering subjects that are still taboo in its study of violence, such as the female gender and the state.The rise of the sociology of violence confronts us with a dilemma. We can either collaborate with the construc-tion of a sub discipline that reproduces the limitations and taboos of current social theory, or we can use the fact that violence has become a “hot topic” as an opportunity to open sociology to themes that are taboo in social the-ory (such as the vital and harmonious character of the biological aspects of social mechanisms or the normative aspects of social settings).
publishDate	2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv	2014-06-28 2022-11-02T14:48:11Z 2022-11-02T14:48:11Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv	Artículo de revista http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 Text info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.coar.fl_str_mv	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
status_str	publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv	de Andrade Dores, A. P. (2014). VIOLENCE IN SOCIETY. Pensamiento Americano, 7(13). https://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v7i13.103 https://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v7i13.103 2745-1402 Corporación Universitaria Américana 2027-2448 RIA - Repositorio Institucional Américana https://repositorio.americana.edu.co/ https://repositorio.americana.edu.co/handle/001/482
identifier_str_mv	de Andrade Dores, A. P. (2014). VIOLENCE IN SOCIETY. Pensamiento Americano, 7(13). https://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v7i13.103 2745-1402 Corporación Universitaria Américana 2027-2448 RIA - Repositorio Institucional Américana
url	https://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v7i13.103 https://repositorio.americana.edu.co/ https://repositorio.americana.edu.co/handle/001/482
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv	eng
language	eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv	163 13 144 7 Pensamiento Americano AAVV (2013). Transformative justice. S. Fran-cisco, Generations FIVE. Acosta, A. (2013). El Buén Vivir - Sumak Kaw-say, una oportunidad para imaginar otros mundos. Barcelona: Icaria & Antrazyt. Almeida, A. N., Margarida André, I., Nunes de Almeida, H. (1999). “Sombras e marcas, os maus tratos às crianças na família”. Análise Social, 150(Autumn), 91-121. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society - Towards a new modernity. New Delhi: Sage. Bouthoul, G. (1991). Traité de polémologie - So-ciologie des guerres. Paris: Payot. Burawoy, M. (2004). “For a Sociological Marx-ism: The Complementary Convergence of Antonio Gramsci and Karl Polanyi”. Politics & Society, 31, 193-261. Castel, R. (1998). As metamorfoses da questão social - uma crónica do salário. Petrópoles: Ed. Vozes. Castells, M. (2012). Redes de Indignación y Es-peranza. Madrid: Ed. Alianza. Collins, R. (2008). Violence: A Micro-sociologi-cal Theory. Princeton: Princeton Univer-sity Press. Dores, A. (2013). The brain, the face and emo-tion. In A. Freitas-Magalhães, C. Bluhm & M. Davis (Eds.), Handbook on facial expression of emotion (pp. 129-181). Porto: FEELab Science Books. Dores, A. P. (2009). Espírito de Submissão. Co-imbra: FCG/Coimbra Editora. Dores, A. P. & Preto, J. (2013). Segredos das Prisões. Cascais: RCP edições. Elias, N. (1990). O Processo Civilizacional (Vol I and II). Lisbon: D. Quixote. Giddens, A. (1991). As conseqüencias da mod-ernidade. S. Paulo: UNESP. Giddens, A. (1985). The Nation-State and Vi-olence - Vol II A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Cambridge: Pol it y. Goffman, E. (2004). Estigma - Notas sobre a Manipulação da Identidade Deteriorada. Sabotagem. Hirschman, A. O. (1997). As Paixões e os Inter-esses. Lisbon: Bizâncio. Lahire, B. (2012). Monde Pluriel - Penser l’unité des sciences sociales. Paris: Seuil. Luhmann, N. (1993). A Improbabilidade da Comunicação. Lisbon: Vega. Martinson, R. (1974a). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The-Public Interest, 35, 22-54. Mouzelis, N. (1995). Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? - diagnosis and remedies. London: Routledge. Nunes, A. S. (1973). “Questões Preliminares sobre as Ciências Sociais”. Lisbon: Cad-ernos G. I. S., N° 10. Poulantzas, N. (1978). State, Power, Socialism.London: New Left Books. Reemtsma, J. P. (2011). Confiance et Violence - Essai sur une configuration particulière de la modernité. Paris: Gallimard. Santos, B. S. (1989). Introdução a uma Ciência Pós-Moderna. Porto: Afrontamento. Santos, B. S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South – Justice against Epistemicide. Paradigm Publishers. Saraiva, A. J. (1994). Inquisição e Cristãos No-vos. Lisbon: Estampa Sennett, R. (2006). The New Culture of Capital-ism. Yale University Press Therborn, G. (2006a). “Meaning, Mechanisms, Patterns and Forces: an Introduction”. In Göran Therborn (ed.) (2006), In-equalities of the World – New Theoreti-cal Frameworks, Multiple empirical ap-proaches. Verso, pp. 1-58. Therborn, G. (2006b). Between Sex and Power – Family in the world. 1900-2000, Rout-lege Torry, M. (2013). Money for Everyone - why we need a citizen’s income. London: Policy Press. Touraine, A. (1984). Le retour de l’acteur. Paris: Fayard. Weber, M. (2005). Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London and NY: Routledge, Wieviorka, M. (2005). La violence. Paris: Hachette Littératures. Wolfe, D. A., Wekerle, C., Scott, K. (1997). Al-ternatives to Violence Empowering Youth to Develop Healthy Relationships. Lon-don: Sage. Young, J. (1999). The Exclusive Society. Lon-don: Sage. Zimbardo, P. (2007). The Lucifer Effect: under-standing how good people turn evil. Ran-dom House.
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv	Todos los derechos reservados Corporación Universitaria Americana. 2014 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv	Todos los derechos reservados Corporación Universitaria Americana. 2014 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv	openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv	20 p. application/pdf application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Pensamiento Americano Barranquilla, Colombia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv	Pensamiento Americano Barranquilla, Colombia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv	https://publicaciones.americana.edu.co/index.php/pensamientoamericano/article/view/103/121
institution	Corporación Universitaria Americana
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_	1811560143187345408
spelling	Violence in societyViolence in societySocial theoryViolenceWomen’s movementsTabooSocietyStateTeoría socialViolenciaMovimietos feministasTabúSociedadEstadoThe recent interest in the sociology of violence has arisen at the same time that western societies are being urged to consider the profound social crisis provoked by global financial turmoil. Social changes demand the evo-lution of sociological practices.The analysis herein proposed, based on the studies of M. Wieviorka, La Violence (2005), and of R. Collins, Violence: A Micro-sociological Theory (2008), concludes that violence is subject to sociological treatments cen-tered on the aggressors, on the struggles for power and on male gender. There is a lack of connection between prac-tical proposals for violence prevention and the sociol-ogy of violence. It is accepted that violence as a subject of study has the potential, as well as the theoretical and social centrality, to promote the debate necessary to bring social theory up to date. This process is more likely to oc-cur in periods of social transformation, when sociology is open to considering subjects that are still taboo in its study of violence, such as the female gender and the state.The rise of the sociology of violence confronts us with a dilemma. We can either collaborate with the construc-tion of a sub discipline that reproduces the limitations and taboos of current social theory, or we can use the fact that violence has become a “hot topic” as an opportunity to open sociology to themes that are taboo in social the-ory (such as the vital and harmonious character of the biological aspects of social mechanisms or the normative aspects of social settings).El interés reciente en la sociología de la violencia ha surgido al mismo tiempo que las sociedades occidenta-les están requiriendo considerar la profunda crisis social provocada por la agitación financiera global. Los cambios sociales demandan la evolución de las prácticas sociológicas. El análisis aquí expuesto, basado en los estudios de M. Wieviorka, La Violence (2005), and of R. Collins, Violence: A Micro-sociological Theory (2008), concluye que la violencia es objeto de tratamientos sociológicos centrados en los agresores, en las luchas por el poder y en el género masculino. Hay una falta de conexión entre las propuestas prácticas para la prevención de la violencia y la sociología de la violencia. Es aceptado que la violencia como objeto de estudio, tiene el potencial, además de la centralidad teórica y social, para actualizar la teoría social. Este proceso ocurre más comúnmente en períodos de transformación social, cuando la sociología está abierta a considerar objetos de estudio que aún son tabúes en su estudio de la violencia, tales como el género femenino y el Estado.El ascenso de la teoría de la violencia nos confronta con un dilema. Tenemos la posibilidad de colaborar con la construcción de una subdisciplina que reproduce las limitaciones y los tabúes de la actual teoría social, o po-demos usar el hecho de que la violencia se ha convertido en un “tema candente” como una oportunidad de abrir la sociología a temas que son tabúes en la teoría social (tales como el vital y armonioso carácter de los aspectos biológicos de los mecanismos sociales o los aspectos nor-mativos de los escenarios sociales.Pensamiento AmericanoBarranquilla, ColombiaSello editorial CoruniamericanaDe Andrade Dores, António Pedro2022-11-02T14:48:11Z2022-11-02T14:48:11Z2014-06-28Artículo de revistahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85Textinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb120 p.application/pdfapplication/pdfde Andrade Dores, A. P. (2014). VIOLENCE IN SOCIETY. Pensamiento Americano, 7(13). https://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v7i13.103https://doi.org/10.21803/pensam.v7i13.1032745-1402Corporación Universitaria Américana2027-2448RIA - Repositorio Institucional Américanahttps://repositorio.americana.edu.co/https://repositorio.americana.edu.co/handle/001/482https://publicaciones.americana.edu.co/index.php/pensamientoamericano/article/view/103/121eng163131447Pensamiento AmericanoAAVV (2013). Transformative justice. S. Fran-cisco, Generations FIVE.Acosta, A. (2013). El Buén Vivir - Sumak Kaw-say, una oportunidad para imaginar otros mundos. Barcelona: Icaria & Antrazyt.Almeida, A. N., Margarida André, I., Nunes de Almeida, H. (1999). “Sombras e marcas, os maus tratos às crianças na família”. Análise Social, 150(Autumn), 91-121.Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society - Towards a new modernity. New Delhi: Sage.Bouthoul, G. (1991). Traité de polémologie - So-ciologie des guerres. Paris: Payot.Burawoy, M. (2004). “For a Sociological Marx-ism: The Complementary Convergence of Antonio Gramsci and Karl Polanyi”. Politics & Society, 31, 193-261.Castel, R. (1998). As metamorfoses da questão social - uma crónica do salário. Petrópoles: Ed. Vozes.Castells, M. (2012). Redes de Indignación y Es-peranza. Madrid: Ed. Alianza.Collins, R. (2008). Violence: A Micro-sociologi-cal Theory. Princeton: Princeton Univer-sity Press.Dores, A. (2013). The brain, the face and emo-tion. In A. Freitas-Magalhães, C. Bluhm & M. Davis (Eds.), Handbook on facial expression of emotion (pp. 129-181). Porto: FEELab Science Books.Dores, A. P. (2009). Espírito de Submissão. Co-imbra: FCG/Coimbra Editora.Dores, A. P. & Preto, J. (2013). Segredos das Prisões. Cascais: RCP edições.Elias, N. (1990). O Processo Civilizacional (Vol I and II). Lisbon: D. Quixote.Giddens, A. (1991). As conseqüencias da mod-ernidade. S. Paulo: UNESP.Giddens, A. (1985). The Nation-State and Vi-olence - Vol II A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Cambridge: Pol it y.Goffman, E. (2004). Estigma - Notas sobre a Manipulação da Identidade Deteriorada. Sabotagem.Hirschman, A. O. (1997). As Paixões e os Inter-esses. Lisbon: Bizâncio.Lahire, B. (2012). Monde Pluriel - Penser l’unité des sciences sociales. Paris: Seuil.Luhmann, N. (1993). A Improbabilidade da Comunicação. Lisbon: Vega.Martinson, R. (1974a). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The-Public Interest, 35, 22-54.Mouzelis, N. (1995). Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? - diagnosis and remedies. London: Routledge.Nunes, A. S. (1973). “Questões Preliminares sobre as Ciências Sociais”. Lisbon: Cad-ernos G. I. S., N° 10.Poulantzas, N. (1978). State, Power, Socialism.London: New Left Books.Reemtsma, J. P. (2011). Confiance et Violence - Essai sur une configuration particulière de la modernité. Paris: Gallimard.Santos, B. S. (1989). Introdução a uma Ciência Pós-Moderna. Porto: Afrontamento.Santos, B. S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South – Justice against Epistemicide. Paradigm Publishers.Saraiva, A. J. (1994). Inquisição e Cristãos No-vos. Lisbon: EstampaSennett, R. (2006). The New Culture of Capital-ism. Yale University PressTherborn, G. (2006a). “Meaning, Mechanisms, Patterns and Forces: an Introduction”. In Göran Therborn (ed.) (2006), In-equalities of the World – New Theoreti-cal Frameworks, Multiple empirical ap-proaches. Verso, pp. 1-58.Therborn, G. (2006b). Between Sex and Power – Family in the world. 1900-2000, Rout-legeTorry, M. (2013). Money for Everyone - why we need a citizen’s income. London: Policy Press.Touraine, A. (1984). Le retour de l’acteur. Paris: Fayard.Weber, M. (2005). Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London and NY: Routledge,Wieviorka, M. (2005). La violence. Paris: Hachette Littératures.Wolfe, D. A., Wekerle, C., Scott, K. (1997). Al-ternatives to Violence Empowering Youth to Develop Healthy Relationships. Lon-don: Sage.Young, J. (1999). The Exclusive Society. Lon-don: Sage.Zimbardo, P. (2007). The Lucifer Effect: under-standing how good people turn evil. Ran-dom House.Todos los derechos reservados Corporación Universitaria Americana. 2014info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/oai:repositorio.americana.edu.co:001/4822023-03-08T15:04:00Z

Violence in society

Publicaciones similares